Results 37 to 43 of 43
-
08-23-2017, 09:13 AM #37
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- where my head touches the pillow
- Posts
- 45,516
- Blog Entries
- 4
-
Re: I was excited about Deonte Thompson
Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
08-23-2017, 12:30 PM #39
Re: I was excited about Deonte Thompson
Reed, & Brown couldn't stay healthy. Doss also got hurt, was soft and didn't work on his game like he needed to. Streeter had bad hands and Waller keeps getting suspended.
All but Waller and Brown (Broncos, on IR) are now out of the league. If they really were better fits in other systems and schemes, then they would still be at least bouncing around the NFL signing futures contracts.
-
Re: I was excited about Deonte Thompson
Hypothetical: we passed on Randall Cobb for Torrey Smith. Would Cobb have played at Torrey's level here, and would Torrey be at Cobb's level in GB?
-
08-23-2017, 07:39 PM #41Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 596
Re: I was excited about Deonte Thompson
-
-
Re: I was excited about Deonte Thompson
I got on a Matt Willis camp bandwagon.
Some of the board went skyrockets over Eron Riley
A number were hoping LaQuan Williams would make it
Wooo Wooo David Reed
Toss Ed Dickson into that group, he was a WR type of TE ... I don't think the scouts have missed with a blocking TE ... Davon Drew had 43 receptions his Sr year at East Carolina, he was supposed to be what we finally got in Pitta.
I'm not sure new scouts are the answer. We have really good scouts as shown by the D talent, and the UDFA crew we get in every year, year after year.
I agree what they've been doing for years just wasn't working.
Scouts were trained/taught, what the team wanted. what to look for, and that was the poor result blind spot. Something changed a couple of years ago. DeCosta never specified what, but talked about changing some things ... working harder ... the usual but his implication was things were now(then) little different in the WR scouting - they at least strongly increased one parameter's value and maybe lowered another. I'd guess height was one they lowered chart valuation on (Harper was 6'3", Demetrius was 6'1", Undrafted Hymes was 6'3", Clarence Moore was 6'6", and Aaron Mellett was 6'3", contrast that with Campanaro 5'10", Tim White 5'10", Keenan 5'10" .... I'm not saying that they don't like height, just saying that I suspect it is one parameter they lowered chart value rating for a WR, and increased something, maybe 3 cone drill? They did adjust what they wanted the scouts to look for and how they draft board slotted them)
We haven't seen results but that has been injury ... Campaneggo looked great every time he was healthy and DeCosta was delighted we could trade back in to get him.at one point of my life I was exactly Pi years old
Bookmarks