Results 481 to 492 of 904
Thread: The great WR RESET of 2018
-
03-13-2018, 01:44 PM #481
-
Re: The great WR RESET of 2018
-JAB
-
03-13-2018, 01:47 PM #483
-
03-13-2018, 01:49 PM #484
-
Re: The great WR RESET of 2018
So Richardson is in around 8M per year, with his best season being 44/703/6. The other three years he failed to top 300 yards.
Moncrief should be getting something similar being that he too has one good year out of four. Lee even more given he has two consecutive solid seasons.
I remain unconvinced we are signing anyone at this point. We may be looking at 2016's receiving group favorably by the time the dust settles here. Even Mike Wallace who by virtue of age and diminishing skill I thought would be around 5-6M is probably an 8M (or more) receiver in this market.back on twitter
"Well that was an appropriate last ride for Pees. A Bengals WR streaking in for a game winning touchdown in the closing minutes is the man’s preferred medium to express his art." - GreenWave52
-
03-13-2018, 01:51 PM #486
-
03-13-2018, 01:51 PM #487
Re: The great WR RESET of 2018
the price of poker is going up boyz
-
Re: The great WR RESET of 2018
Why would Jax let lee go?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
03-13-2018, 01:57 PM #489
-
03-13-2018, 01:57 PM #490
-
03-13-2018, 01:58 PM #491
Re: The great WR RESET of 2018
Jeff Zrebiec
Verified account
@jeffzrebiecsun
4m4 minutes ago
More
Don't know how realistic it is given their competition, but sounds like Ravens have been in on TE Jimmy Graham. With Saints and Packers believed to be the top two teams involved, they are fighting an uphill battle.
-
03-13-2018, 01:58 PM #492
Re: The great WR RESET of 2018
Paul Richardson gets 5 years $40M, $20M guaranteed. Have to think Marqise Lee is in that ballpark.
Lee is the last available difference maker IMO. If we can get Lee I'd be fine with also getting Moncrief. But Moncrief by himself doesn't really do much for me.
Bookmarks