Results 37 to 48 of 50
-
01-12-2018, 03:25 AM #37
Re: When did player evaluations start to go south?
First lemme say WNC and Greenwave...great post! Dilly Dilly to you both!
Now ..I posted over in the draft thread this same thing ..I think the FO “outsmarts itself”. Or like has been said here gets too cute. The other thread I used the 16 draft as an example ( much to Baldy’s remorse) with the players they could have drafted had they not traded down and taken Correa who made everyone scratch their heads. It was kinda sad. Then i did the same for the rest of that draft. As of today the Ravens passed on 3 Pro Bowlers from that draft and all where taken either when we shoulda drafted ( Correa) or after we did in later rounds. The other guys they missed are average to better than. I really think Oz and Co started to believe their own hype and they’ve missed greatly
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
01-12-2018, 04:23 AM #38
-
01-12-2018, 05:44 AM #39
Re: When did player evaluations start to go south?
you saying this, reminded me that Eric "guesses" every year what 2-3 players will be there when Ravens will pick and are high on our board. They're working the analytics, have got info from within the other teams, look at other's needs etc and can muster a judgement call. Some drafts they came out and said their board got depleted by the time we had to pick, for respective rounds. So, yes, I do also believe they're out-working themselves too much lately and throw that "having a feel for a player" out the window - which was the case when they took Ogden, Ray, Ed...
-
01-12-2018, 07:45 AM #40
Re: When did player evaluations start to go south?
How stupid is it to tell Ozzie to draft more Pro Bowl players? The coaches, players, and fans vote for that, and since there are relatively few fans in the Baltimore market, we are always going to get short-changed by that process. Is that your marker for the FO? – what a great fanbase! Tell him to get quality players, if you really have to open your mouth. Btw, he knows that; that’s what he and Eric have been doing. Compare the roster now with what we had in 2013.
Stop whining about Correa and Kaufusi. Rather, look at the context of the long list of good players in the 2016 haul. It also would not surprise me if we are the best in the league at finding useful UDFAs, an effort which seems to keep improving.
If you don’t like Ozzie and Eric’s work, then John Idzik, former GM of the Jets might appeal to you. I am sure he sat down with his staff – which he included in the draft decisions, so that everybody’s fingerprints were on it (as if that protected him) – and said the equivalent of “Let’s pick just Pro Bowlers”! Such a committee approach is going to yield compromise candidates, and that may be what happened with Perriman. “I know he needs work – but he is so big and fast!”
The problem with evaluation lies mainly with the coaches.
In 2015, late in a season of losses, Daryl Smith went into a game with an injury, and played the whole game, not very well. When a reporter asked DC Pees about Daryl’s poor performance, Pees only replied that Daryl was nursing an injury, that was why. The question then should have been “Well, why (in God’s name) didn’t Arthur Brown get an extended look that day?” The answer was that Pees would get blamed if Brown stunk, but not if Daryl Smith played hurt. Oh no, the coaches had to keep Arthur in the doghouse. So, we hold onto to Arthur Brown for extra years, and quietly push him out the back door, rather than letting him get real experience, and making something of himself. If he played and stunk, we would have gotten rid of him after two years instead of more. But he never played. He took up roster space and a second round salary for extra years with zero production.
Bowser and T Williams can play, but are already underdeveloped – Harbaugh and Wink better get them on the field on D.
MM is another one who is afraid to evaluate. Why does Joe have 15 receivers getting the ball in a game, Wallace getting about 6 targets and everybody else getting 2 or 3? How is Joe supposed to know the guy he is throwing to and get into any sort of rhythm? After it became abundantly clear that Perriman doesn’t have it, why didn’t Chris Moore get more snaps? Moore is finally starting to show something as a WR, but how is he supposed to develop with 2 or 3 targets a game? The same applies to Campanaro, who was finally relatively healthy for a season. What if he stayed healthy again – what do we have in this guy? He gets open and catches, and runs – why doesn’t he get the ball? MM took the easy way out, just rotated the players. That way he cannot be blamed for making a commitment to a guy who did not pan out. However, in the setup we have now, nobody looks very good – but several young players are underdeveloped for the time they have been in a Ravens uniform.
Spineless coaching."Flacco is driving the ball in that wind....."
(AFCCG, January 2013)
-
Re: When did player evaluations start to go south?
That was part of it but there were many other cap misses. Monroe cost a huge amount of cap space and only played about half the games after he signed his deal. He then retired creating another big cap hit. Flacco's contract which was kept cheap in the early years at the expensive of massive cap numbers down the road. Even smaller dumb deals like extending Forsett and then cutting him and then bringing him back and then cutting him again cost more that $3 million against the cap.
Ray Rice is definitely part of it but if anything that and these other dumb cap decisions are why you need to do better in the draft because those players are cheap. Drafting well is how you overcome cap mistakes.
-
01-12-2018, 08:37 AM #42
Re: When did player evaluations start to go south?
"Flacco is driving the ball in that wind....."
(AFCCG, January 2013)
-
01-12-2018, 09:52 AM #43Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 958
Re: When did player evaluations start to go south?
The way that you've put it, it really doesn't sound as bad people as making it out to be. It really just sounds like its taken 2-3 years for these guys to develop, and then we lose them to free agency. So maybe the problem is just that we're so cap strapped that we haven't been able to hold onto guys who have good cogs for us. And, the 2011 CBA that only gives you four years for draftees instead of five years probably hurts too. So then it can come back to us overpaying for Flacco being a problem.
-
01-12-2018, 09:59 AM #44
Re: When did player evaluations start to go south?
We started to covet picks more than actual talent.... The obsession over comp picks is ridiculous to me. The front office would rather collect 3 picks at the end of rounds 4-6 than spend draft capital to get playmakers.
Somewhere along the way we really did think we were smarter than everyone else. Picks are more valuable than the players themselves. We think we're the Hoody when we arent.
Interestingly it seems the league has flipped and been more willing to part with picks to acquire players recently....another example of us falling behind the times IMOBurn it down
-
01-12-2018, 10:06 AM #45
Re: When did player evaluations start to go south?
Yes sir. My point exactly. Picks are a tool not an investment. Use those tools to better your team. Who really cares if you had 7,8,11 or whatever picks if all the guys you get are barely JAGS. Gimme 4 or 5 solid picks of guys who are contributors and I think the fan base would be ecstatic!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
-
01-12-2018, 06:38 PM #47Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
- Ellicott City
- Posts
- 196
Re: When did player evaluations start to go south?
I thought I heard a lot of our talented scouts have been getting poached, Philly to name one club, and look how they're doing
-
01-12-2018, 09:39 PM #48Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,670
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: When did player evaluations start to go south?
I beg to differ with your assessment. I think by over dwelling on defense, and having several busts, the Ravens have not over-all drafted wisely these last several years. Since the super bowl : Elam (1st - 2013), Arthur Brown (2nd - 2013), Simon (4th - 2013, let go in 2014), K.L-M (6th - 2013), Urban (4th - 2014), Correa (2nd - 2016), Kaufusi (3rd - 2016); 2017 under-used = Bowser (2nd), Wormley (3a), Tim Wms (3b). Offense = Perriman (1st - 2015)/ Maxx Williams (2nd - 2015)... 'nuff said... Bc
Bookmarks