Those on the left supporting these Statists, please explain

**CarrollCoRaven** · 08-09-2024, 10:52 AM

Originally Posted by Greg

No, there is not, but I am going to stay on this until I get an explanation or a surrender to the fact that there is a Deep State and it needs to be eliminated.

Perhaps he is working on a 100,000 word essay in explaining all of the things that have transpired since the senility of Biden (which we've known for 5 years) was on full display.

And how about that being an absolute set-up to get rid of Biden. They sent him out there without being juiced up so he would look as bad as he is and has been because he was going to lose to Trump and they are throwing a Hail Kamala. This way they could scoot him out without explaining why, because we all saw why.

I've been hearing that Kamala was talked into using the 25th amendment by Nancy and Obama to remove him, which finally convinced Joe to drop out. He did not want that embarrassment on his record. Yeah, but we are told Joe was quite the Patriot to give up his run for the Presidency.

**blueridgemtnman** · 08-09-2024, 03:14 PM

Originally Posted by jonboy79

Entirely possible….

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

More like plausible, I'd say.

**Captain Silver** · 08-09-2024, 03:26 PM

Originally Posted by Greg

And how about that being an absolute set-up to get rid of Biden. They sent him out there without being juiced up so he would look as bad as he is and has been because he was going to lose to Trump and they are throwing a Hail Kamala. This way they could scoot him out without explaining why, because we all saw why.

Meanwhile, Governor Hair Gel, I mean Newsom here in California, is all of a sudden going HAM on homeless!

https://www.newsweek.com/gavin-newso...mpment-1937018

I'm telling you that he is their boy in 2028.

**CarrollCoRaven** · 08-09-2024, 03:56 PM

Originally Posted by Captain Silver

Meanwhile, Governor Hair Gel, I mean Newsom here in California, is all of a sudden going HAM on homeless!

https://www.newsweek.com/gavin-newso...mpment-1937018

I'm telling you that he is their boy in 2028.

Or could it be as early as 2024, if they choose him at their convention? Is there time to still do that if the truth about Kamala is exposed and her numbers start going down? Why is he cleaning up this early if he's got over 4 years before the 2028 election?

**Captain Silver** · 08-09-2024, 04:37 PM

Originally Posted by CarrollCoRaven

Or could it be as early as 2024, if they choose him at their convention? Is there time to still do that if the truth about Kamala is exposed and her numbers start going down? Why is he cleaning up this early if he's got over 4 years before the 2028 election?

I think because he only has 2 years left as Governor.

**simplesimon** · 08-09-2024, 05:39 PM

Kamala Harris response: https://shorturl.at/YRkTR

I think it's a woman thing. Tulsi I'm the parent here. Go to your room.

**Greg** · 08-09-2024, 06:33 PM

Originally Posted by simplesimon

Kamala Harris response: https://shorturl.at/YRkTR

I think it's a woman thing. Tulsi I'm the parent here. Go to your room.

Is this supposed to be a response to this thread?

Are you here to defend the deep state?

P.S. That is the most intelligent she has ever sounded.

**simplesimon** · 08-11-2024, 01:38 PM

Originally Posted by Greg

Is this supposed to be a response to this thread?

Are you here to defend the deep state?

P.S. That is the most intelligent she has ever sounded.

Not the point. Women can be very vengeful if you get on their wrong side. Even my own mother or girlfriend would do things if I got on their wrong side (which I always avoid now

).

**Greg** · 08-11-2024, 02:47 PM

Originally Posted by simplesimon

Not the point. Women can be very vengeful if you get on their wrong side. Even my own mother or girlfriend would do things if I got on their wrong side (which I always avoid now

).

Actually, responding to a thread is the point. Also, are you defending this? Are you okay with this?

That's the point of the thread.

**Culex** · 08-11-2024, 03:55 PM

Originally Posted by simplesimon

Not the point. Women can be very vengeful if you get on their wrong side. Even my own mother or girlfriend would do things if I got on their wrong side (which I always avoid now

).

A vengeful woman sounds exactly what the White House does not need

**Greg** · 08-12-2024, 05:08 PM

I am still waiting for someone on the left to justify this.

This is an example of using government to attack political opponents. Oh, you can hide behind "the law" with what they did to Trump, or cries of "insurrection" against Jan 6ers, 99% of which were not violent and simply walked in (and MANY who didn't even enter the Capital), or what they do to pro-lifers on SIDEWALKS outside of abortion mills singing or praying, or . . . how much do you need to see?

While none of those are excusable a mild delusional rationalization might get you to buy that crap. But this? Against Gabbard? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING CAN JUSTIFY THIS.

I don't think that list I posted can be justified. And there is a lot more.

So just admit it. Your side uses the government to destroy (or at minimum harass) political opponents. This it third world, banana republic crap you support. Own it.

**CarrollCoRaven** · 08-13-2024, 03:08 PM

Originally Posted by Greg

Scroll down a bit.

What a complete waste of money and resources while we have KNOWN terrorists coming across our border. That's okay, but a service member who has no history what-so-ever of being dangerous (except to bring the truth) is under surveillance, much less this amount.

Tulsi Gabbard Taking Legal Action Against Biden Administration for Putting Her on Terrorist Watch List
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...dministration/