Results 13 to 24 of 35
Thread: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
-
11-18-2012, 10:14 AM #13Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 154
Re: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
This would be terrible. I really hope they don't bail for what will be the equivalent of around 5-7mil more per year. As a former MD grad, it would make getting to away games miserable and very costly.
And I know most people could care less about the non revenue generating sports, but it would kill soccer, field hockey, and lacrosse. MD has great tradition and history and championships in these sports and that would be ruined.
I hope they stay put.
-
Re: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
Oh, it's WAY more than that. Try around $16-17 million a year.
And I doubt it kills other sports...especially lacrosse. Hopkins is an annual national power and they aren't in a power conference.
Maybe this also helps them get a couple of those sports they cut back too...with proper funding as well.FREE BEN CLEVELAND!!!
-
11-18-2012, 10:49 AM #15Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 154
Re: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
Nah, I think it will be less. The big ten/ big 10 network offers each team 8 million more per year than ACC does. This does not include that number dwindling because of adding two more schools to the pot plus the cost of travel will be much higher for each sport. Now, the Big10 TV contract will be up in 2017, so more money will probably be negotiated.
Short term, they will lose booster money as most purists will be annoyed as hell by the move. Especially the ones who spend time and money travelling to away games now. And the prospect of being a doormat in football will not make recruiting any easier. Plus, adding Syracuse and Pitt for basketball basically turned the ACC into the premier B-ball conference, and MD is a basketball school.
-
Re: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
Pretty sure those figures that are reported out from the TV networks don't include the Big 10 network money.
The word from the "insiders" are talking a much bigger figure than $8 million.FREE BEN CLEVELAND!!!
-
Re: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
Someone crunched some numbers on the MD board...about the Big 10 network.
Basically you can get upwards of 14.6 million subscribers by adding UMD and Rutgers. The actual fee jumps to .75 cent per month for the channel that is on basic.
Basically this would add somewhere between $8.76 mill to $10.22 million per month. That is what...$105 to $122 per year?
There is a LOT of money out here at stake and trust me, MD isn't going to leave for $5-8 million (although $8 million in itself is significant) and take all the backlash from alumni.
This is going to be a very large windfall for the AD (and it will also help with funds for the academic side as well)FREE BEN CLEVELAND!!!
-
Re: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
I think the whole thing stinks to high hell. I'm sick of all the traditions in college sports being thrown out the window for the almighty dollar.
-
-
11-18-2012, 12:09 PM #20Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
-
11-18-2012, 12:27 PM #21Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- Kent Island
- Posts
- 2,175
Re: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
Exactly. Turgeon has already done a good job at recruiting and the basketball team is going to be very good IMO. I'll miss the Duke and NC matchups if they can't schedule some out of conference games. Football on the other hand, will suffer mostly due to the turmoil (player departures, coaching changes, injuries etc). I think that Edsall will improve that program in the next couple of years. Overall I have no personal reason to dislike a potential move to the Big Ten. It sure would be nice to see UMD sports on national television once in a while.
-
Re: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
Wow, read about it this morning for the first time and I have to admit I was floored. I get that it's about the money but this move would likely mean the ACC is on it's way to extinction. Kinda sad but hopefully it'll be good for the University long term
-
11-18-2012, 02:06 PM #23
Re: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
As a MD Alum, from a purely economics stand point this is an excellent move. The extra revenue generated for the academic departments means MD can attract better professors. It might also keep the tuition down to an almost reasonable level. While it's nice to wax nostalgic about the bygone days, universities are big business and so are sports programs. I think it is a safe bet that none of use would turn down a large increase in income because we are emotionally wedded to an institution.
-
11-18-2012, 04:21 PM #24
Re: OT: Maryland to the Big Ten
I agree it sucks but in fairness to UMD they were certainly not the ones who started this move towards super-conferences, all they are doing is making sure they have a chair when the music stops. I would rather they do that then be sitting here in 5-6 yrs in a ACC conference without UNC, VaTech, FSU, Miami, Clemson etc because those teams went to the Big 10, SEC or Big 12 instead. Reality sucks but is what it is.
“A linebacker's job is to knock out running backs, to knock out receivers, to chase the football,”
-Ray Lewis
Bookmarks