Results 13 to 24 of 109
-
07-12-2012, 10:51 AM #13
Re: The Freeh Report and the Future of Penn State
Thanks for making my point. Those programs violated NCAA by-laws - recruiting violations, prohibited benefits to players, etc. - and were repeat violators (and had received previous punishment), which the NCAA's rule on death penalty calls for when applying the death penalty. They were appropriately punished, pursuant to those rules.
In this case, what the authorities at Penn State did was criminal, but not necessarily a violation of NCAA rules.
Again, what happened at Penn State is waaaay bigger than the football program. It show an educational institution that was totally out of control. The penalties should appropriately come from the authorities that deal with those issues - prosecutors, the State of PA and the Department of Ed.
-
07-12-2012, 10:54 AM #14
Re: The Freeh Report and the Future of Penn State
I certainly understand - and agree - with your point. I'm just not sure that the drafters of the NCAA rules ever envisioned this sort of circumstance. I would agree that there's probably a way to fashion an argument for some sort of punishment, but I don't see it being the death penalty (as some are calling for).
-
-
07-12-2012, 10:57 AM #16Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
-
07-12-2012, 11:01 AM #17
Re: The Freeh Report and the Future of Penn State
Exactly.
Yes, it is a crime. A crime punishable by the police and prosecutors (and possible the ATF).
The NCAA, OTOH, did not sanction them for that because it was not a violation of an NCAA rule.
While I am sure that there are a lot of people higher up in the NCAA who would like to take action in the present matter, they know that they are bound by the rules that are before them. IMO, the NCAA is going to have a hard time making those rules fit into a death penalty situation.
-
-
07-12-2012, 11:09 AM #19
Re: The Freeh Report and the Future of Penn State
So you are calling for "no football program for 10 years". And you think that is an appropriate response?
I'm all in favor of burning the perps (and we know who they are) at the stake. They were responsible. But I'm not in favor of carpet bombing an institution because it may have benefitted financially from the football program thriving.
WORLD CHAMPIONS 2000 * 2012
-
07-12-2012, 11:11 AM #20Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 1,541
-
-
07-12-2012, 11:16 AM #22Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 4,260
Re: The Freeh Report and the Future of Penn State
And there are STILL PSU supporters who are claiming that this thing is overblown and that it's the media's fault.
Simply amazing.
PP
-
07-12-2012, 11:29 AM #23
Re: The Freeh Report and the Future of Penn State
The PSU forums are amazing right now.
-
07-12-2012, 12:03 PM #24
Re: The Freeh Report and the Future of Penn State
Fine let's not kill the football program. Let them continue to play and compete. Let's take all revenues for the next 10 years generated by the football program and donate them to the appropriate charity. Penn State benefitted financially from criminal acts and this is the only way to ensure that real change will be made on that campus.
Bookmarks