Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: Full backs in the HOF?
-
Full backs in the HOF?
As a full back on my team in the UK, and as you can tell by my name I am a big fan of NFL full backs. There has been some great players in the position, and while I know its a dying breed, has there ever been a full back ever inducted into the HOF? If not should there be? LO Neal deserves it for sure, as does Tony Richardson IMO.
The argument can be made that they are technically running backs and don't get the statistics RB's get in their careers for obvious reasons, but really they should be classed as agile offensive linemen IMO. I mean so many full backs have had a big reason for a running backs success, I am sure that our rushing offense wouldn't have been half as good in 2008 without LO Neal, and this season while Rice is an amazing back and would be great behind any full back, Vonta Leach made some very important blocks/pancakes on players to pave way for Rice this season.
-
Re: Full backs in the HOF?
There are lots of fullbacks on this list, Larry Csonka from the undefeated Dolphins was the name that grabbed my attention
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...Fame_inductees
But this has me wondering, did fullback mean something different back in that era?
Csonka was a top rusher, Leach never will be
I don't realy know, positions evolve over time
-
-
02-25-2012, 08:11 AM #4
Re: Full backs in the HOF?
Fullbacks were often bulldozer straight ahead runners who would pound into LBs and fall down for extra yardage. Strength, not speed. Rarely pass catchers. Short yardage pounders, especially 4th down or goal line, mano-a-mano.
In my opinion, the FB position has been diminished by the West Coast offense, the occasional H-back formation, need for speed. There are many smarter X&O's guys on the forum who can more intelligently explain why the FB position is dying.
I hate change, period, but particularly change without benefit. I preferred watching football with greater use of fullbacks: Franco Harris, Larry Csonka, Earl Campbell, John Riggins, Jim Brown etc were great to watch. Not sexy, no acrobatics or road-runner speed, but pounding the rock.In a 2003 BBC poll that asked Brits to name the "Greatest American Ever", Mr. T came in fourth, behind ML King (3rd), Abe Lincoln (2nd) and Homer Simpson (1st).
-
-
Re: Full backs in the HOF?
-
Re: Full backs in the HOF?
The Hall of Fame voters have always put way too emphasis on stats. Most fans seem to that as well and yes, it is wrong. LeRon McClain made 2 Pro Bowls here in Baltimore being about as mediocre a lead blocker as a fullback could but he ran the ball.
The Baseball Hall of Fame is the basis for all the American Hall of Fames. Baseball is a sport completely based on stats. Too bad other sports restrict themselves using that model.
-
Re: Full backs in the HOF?
Jim Brown even spent time as a FB, if I am not mistaken.
"Please take with you this final sword, The Excellector. I am praying that your journey will be guided by the light", Leon Shore
-
Re: Full backs in the HOF?
i dont like how the HOF voters vote. IMO if your the best at you position one of the best ever at your position regardless of position you should be in the HOF. But yet the HOF overlooks positions as if they werent important like punter and kicker. Thus why Matt Stover will never be a HOFer
-
02-27-2012, 02:53 AM #10
Re: Full backs in the HOF?
The FB dying out is worst part of today's football. Lining up in the I and running AT the opponent is what made football the greatest sport on turf.
Bookmarks