Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
Football is better than soccer - from a Brit.
Nice read on the British point of view. I work at an international company and I am noticing the number of co-workers interested in "our" game is rising.
Simply because this is a hot topic with games in London. Check out the article below:
LINK
:uk:
-
12-21-2011, 10:52 AM #2
Re: Football is better than soccer - from a Brit.
Nice article. I love soccer, but I'd generally prefer to watch football. On the other hand, I think I'd prefer to play soccer.
-
12-21-2011, 11:36 AM #3Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 2,126
Re: Football is better than soccer - from a Brit.
As a Brit, I agree. It is.
I think I'd differ on the main reasoning. I fell mostly out of 'soccer' due to the predictability of it. In the Premier League, its always, at best, a three horse race. The horses may change on occasion (like Manchester City has seemingly supplanted Chelsea now), but why bother watching if you know who's going to win year after year after year? It'S not like the draft where even if you have a fallow few years, there's a good chance somewhere down the line that your team will be good again.
In the EPL, unless you've found yourself a rich sugar daddy, there's no chance of that occurring. It's not just England either. Spain it's down to two clubs, Germany it's Bayern and everyone else etc. It's just dull.
There are other issues, of course - like the theatrics.
The only thing better about it is the suitability of the name. 'Soccer' (which is a horrible word) has much more to do with actually kicking it than (American) football. Throwball would be closer to the truth.
-
12-21-2011, 11:55 AM #4
Re: Football is better than soccer - from a Brit.
Festivus
His definitions and arguments were so clear in his own mind that he was unable to understand how any reasonable person could honestly differ with him.
-
Re: Football is better than soccer - from a Brit.
Any Given Sunday
I find the whole cap system, draft process and other aspects fascinating
The fact we started the season and leaving aside the Packers there are any number of teams including the Ravens who could go all the way
If football was like the Premier League then Washington and Dallas might be dominating every year.
And while I don't know a lot about baseball I read and watched Moneyball and maybe this happens there with the big market teams?
Parity is a fantastic concept and if that was lost during the CBA then possibly football may have started to decline
Just my piece
-
12-21-2011, 01:22 PM #6
Re: Football is better than soccer - from a Brit.
That would be horrifying!
As much as we (Americans) like to complain about the lack of parody in baseball, I don't think it's nearly as dominated by the big money teams as the EPL and some other European soccer leagues.
Last 10 World Series Champs:
2011 - St. Louis Cardinals
2010 - San Francisco Giants
2009 - New York Yankees
2008 - Philadelphia Phillies
2007 - Boston Red Sox
2006 - St. Louis Cardinals
2005 - Chicago White Sox
2004 - Boston Red Sox
2003 - Florida Marlins
2002 - Anaheim Angels
Last 10 EPL Champs:
2011 - Man U
2010 - Chelsea
2009 - Man U
2008 - Man U
2007 - Man U
2006 - Chelsea
2005 - Chelsea
2004 - Arsenal
2003 - Man U
2002 - Arsenal
Of course you could make the argument that a league that determines it's champion with a playoff as opposed to using their regular season record is likely to have more sporadic results, but I don't think it's fully accounting for the stark difference here.
This is the primary reason that I really only watch soccer during the World Cup. Of course if DC United comes to Baltimore I'd change my tune in a hot second!
Bookmarks