Results 37 to 48 of 77
Thread: Suh
-
11-25-2011, 01:08 PM #37
Re: Suh
Master of 'Gifs for dummies'
"The world called for wetwork, and we answered. No greater good. No just cause." - Kazuhira Miller
-
Re: Suh
The Dalton fine came from the first preseason game, and at the start of that play Suh is hit in the facemask by left guard. He pushes through the block, grabs Dalton around the shoulders, hitting Dalton's helmet with his facemask causing it to come off, and then takes him down.
It was a dumb play because Dalton released the ball just before Suh hit him. He shouldn't have taken him down. If he releases him after the hit, he probably wouldn't have even drawn a flag.
-
11-25-2011, 01:38 PM #39Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Westminster, Md
- Posts
- 2,854
Re: Suh
How does the old saying go?
"two wrongs don't make a right"
The guy is a scum bag bottom line. You dont throw tantrums like that in any profession...
-
11-25-2011, 01:40 PM #40
Re: Suh
Let me get this straight bacchys... You willing to turn a blind eye to Suh's aggressive (sometimes overly agressive) play based on the fact that sometimes he is illegally blocked. Its okay to grab a player by the head and throw him to the ground, because he was hit in the facemask.
I wonder if you would have the same opinion if Suggs reacted this way. Sizzle is held on virtually every play. You dont see him flying off the handle and losing his cool.
At some point you got to take responsiblity for your own actions. Regardless if someone pushed your buttons or not. Its part of being a mature adult. You giving Suh a pass would only encourage this type of behavior in the future.
If I'm the commish Suh season is done for several reasons. First he has a history of borderline dirty play and has been fined for it before. Second, this was a nationally televised game on Thanksgiving. Finally, but IMO the most important, is Haynesworth was sat for 5 games for a similar incident and he had no reputation of being a dirty player at all.Master of 'Gifs for dummies'
"The world called for wetwork, and we answered. No greater good. No just cause." - Kazuhira Miller
-
Re: Suh
At least Haynesworth has the balls to own up to his incident after the fact:
"What I did out there was disgusting. It doesn't matter what the league does to me. The way I feel right now, you just can't describe it."
-
11-25-2011, 02:02 PM #42
Re: Suh
I think the Schwartz should suspend Suh right now, and not wait for Roger.
Last edited by Mr OC; 11-25-2011 at 02:10 PM.
.
.
There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the universe is for and why it is here it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarrely inexplicable…
There is another theory which states that this - has - already - happened…
"We don't have a town drunk...we all take turns..."
-
11-25-2011, 02:09 PM #43
Re: Suh
Hello..I come to this forum quite a bit and enjoy reading and following the debates here. Although I rarely post, I find the forum both informative and entertaining. But reading the above made me need to post this.
I have seen both in sports and just in life people get mad and stomp at things, myself included. The intent is to stomp at whatever has angered you. Even if in doing so your head and shoulders are turned away the intent is still the same, you are stomping and trying to harm what angered you.
Suh may be a good football player, but he has anger issues that he needs to get addressed before he can truly become great. In this instance a fine and suspension are clearly warranted.
-
11-25-2011, 02:11 PM #44Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 3,623
Re: Suh
There is a difference between understanding why something happened, and then condoning that act.
I think many of you are mis-understanding what Bacchys is saying.
-
Re: Suh
Suh is quickly becoming the dirtiest player in the league. Was he like that in college? What a jerk...he couldn't even man up and take responsibility. He just stood there in front of the cameras and made excuses. He deserves whatever he has coming to him.
-
Re: Suh
You're not getting it straight. I'm not condoning or excusing his actions. I've repeatedly said he should have been ejected and he should be fined. Because i don't think he had the intent of stomping on him, I don't think he should be suspended for this action alone. If Goodell thinks his pattern of conduct requires it, that's a different question.
So, no, I'm not willing to turn a blind eye to his actions, and it's not okay to grab a player around the head and throw him to the ground, especially after he's already thrown the football.
I wonder if you would have the same opinion if Suggs reacted this way. Sizzle is held on virtually every play. You dont see him flying off the handle and losing his cool.
One of the reasons I didn't want Ryan as HC after Billick was fired was because his unit (the defense) was the worst disciplined on the team. I didn't think he could bring them back under control because he was there when things got out of control. I've been very happy with Harbaugh's approach and the way the team has responded. They're much better at not hurting the team by lashing out stupidly at what the other team does or when the refs make a bad call or fail to make a good one.
-
Re: Suh
The sad thing is, Suh doesn't need to play like that in order to be great. He has already drawn a lot of accolades but the dirty play could tarnish his image and cost him a lot in endorsements. I hope he cleans it up.
World Domination 3 Points at a Time!
-
11-25-2011, 04:36 PM #48
Re: Suh
Festivus
His definitions and arguments were so clear in his own mind that he was unable to understand how any reasonable person could honestly differ with him.
Bookmarks