Quote Originally Posted by yeahravens View Post
In a 3-4 scheme, the LB's are the pass rushers, in a 4-3 scheme there are DE's, in zone blitzing a DT is at linebacker and the linebacker blitzes. So if you watched the Ravens at all you would not make this argument because it doesn't apply and you can't support it.

How do INT's fit into your "well rounded" definition?

btw - Aaron Kampman had 62 tackles and 9.5 sacks at DT last year, Ngata had 55 tackles and 0 sacks. Who would you rather have?

***Kampman is 6'4" 265lbs and Ngata is 6'4' 345 lbs.
Thanks for that super simplistic view of defensive schemes. As for the 3-4/4-3 comparison I'm not entirely sure what that is relevant with regards to the Ravens, we play both fronts and in fact played more snaps last year in a 4-3 front than 3-4, not by much (about 27% to 23%) but more snaps in a 4-3.

Also your comparison for Kampman I don't get what you're getting at in the slightest, Kampman played DE last year and will be playing 3-4 OLB this year for Green Bay, so I've no idea why you want to draw that comparison at all.