Results 37 to 47 of 47
Thread: ABC whistleblower is allegedly about to expose ABC's collusion with Kamala prior to the debate.
-
09-15-2024, 02:07 PM #37Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Posts
- 7,294
Re: ABC whistleblower is allegedly about to expose ABC's collusion with Kamala prior to the debate.
-
-
09-15-2024, 04:53 PM #39
Re: ABC whistleblower is allegedly about to expose ABC's collusion with Kamala prior to the debate.
-
Re: ABC whistleblower is allegedly about to expose ABC's collusion with Kamala prior to the debate.
Troll this. Here's the Affidavit with proof of the Harris collusion with fake news ABC prior to the debate. But keep in mind, Trump is the threat to Democracy, not the daily lies the media continuously tells you.
“Observations Pertaining to Debate Fairness: I have noted specific instances related to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris that raise concerns about procedural fairness: The specific instances of perceived bias are as follows:
The Harris campaign received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to Donald Trump.
It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to factchecking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.
The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...s-put-gateway/"The significance of the passage of time, unburdened by what has been."
-
Re: ABC whistleblower is allegedly about to expose ABC's collusion with Kamala prior to the debate.
PROUD DISABLED VETERAN DESPITE RSR HATRED
-
Re: ABC whistleblower is allegedly about to expose ABC's collusion with Kamala prior to the debate.
By Sunday, the alleged affidavit was released, and it didn’t hold back. In part, the affidavit stated:
“Observations Pertaining to Debate Fairness: I have noted specific instances related to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris that raise concerns about procedural fairness: The specific instances of perceived bias are as follows:
The Harris campaign received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to Donald Trump.
It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to factchecking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.
The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.
[…]
The affidavit, signed and notarized on September 9th, 2024, included a certified letter allegedly sent to Speaker Mike Johnson and recordings of conversations that support the whistleblower’s claims. The whistleblower also sent a Federal Express package containing the affidavit.
-
-
09-16-2024, 02:19 PM #44
Re: ABC whistleblower is allegedly about to expose ABC's collusion with Kamala prior to the debate.
I don't know a lot but I know a little
-
-
Re: ABC whistleblower is allegedly about to expose ABC's collusion with Kamala prior to the debate.
yes it is its a twitter post with an allegation. There is no proof. Another nothing burger.Trust me.
Speaking of Media, lets check in on republican media
The editor in chief of the National Review just said the N word in regards to Haitians and Megyn Kelly ignores it.
https://x.com/Esqueer_/status/1835748826310983792PROUD DISABLED VETERAN DESPITE RSR HATRED
-
Re: ABC whistleblower is allegedly about to expose ABC's collusion with Kamala prior to the debate.
Good video on the whistleblower of the Disney/ABC debate. The affidavit was filed prior to the debate, so they knew what the backroom deals were with the Harris campaign beforehand. The guy says he has audio proof. Even a former Clinton aid calls out ABC and says they need to be investigated. This could become the 2024 version of the Laptop from Hell story of 2020. The only difference is the word can get out on X, where in 2020, everything was censored. Trump should sue the Mouse for everything they got. Can you say election interference? I can.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcmCzzMIfiM"The significance of the passage of time, unburdened by what has been."
Bookmarks