Remember these FBI scum bags?

[Captain Silver]

You clearly believe it but you wont say it because you know its an undefensable position, as fox news and Donald found out

It is called suspicion. Don't tell me what the fuck I believe. I can be suspicious. Since I can't prove shit, I don't say it was stolen. How think is your skull?

Suspicion:

1 - the act or an instance of suspecting something wrong without proof or on slight evidence : mistrust

2 - a state of mental uneasiness and uncertainty : doubt

Example: a barely detectable amount : trace
"Just a suspicion of garlic - suspicion."

[ShadeRaven]

Exactly, you believe it but since you dont have proof you have to call it suspicion, you just agreed with me.

[Captain Silver]

Exactly, you believe it but since you dont have proof you have to call it suspicion, you just agreed with me.

No, I suspect, but I cannot prove it. Can you read? I mean it in all sincerity.

If I believed, I would say, "I believe."

See the difference?

It is like a hypothesis. I know it is a big word. You can think of something, but without proof, it means nothing.

Belief is like gravity; I believe in that, not thinking maybe it is real.

[ShadeRaven]

You believe this next election will be attempted to stolen

[steelerhater]

Exactly, you believe it but since you dont have proof you have to call it suspicion, you just agreed with me.

Since there is actual proof that the FBI interfered in the last 2 elections, it’s certainly reasonable to suspect that there were some other fishy things going on.

[ShadeRaven]

Since there is actual proof that the FBI interfered in the last 2 elections, it’s certainly reasonable to suspect that there were some other fishy things going on.

Proof?

[Captain Silver]

You believe this next election will be attempted to stolen

I can't say. I don't have complete data on the election counting in swing states, so I will stay out of the speculation.

[blah3]

Proof?

See hunter biden lap top

[steelerhater]

See hunter biden lap top

Also 2016 election:
For starters:

A document was altered by Kevin Clinesmith (FBI lawyer) in the application of the FISA warrant.

Peter Strzok (part of Russian collusion investigation) returned an email about Trump becoming President: “No. no he won’t, we’ll stop it”

The FBI offered. Christopher Steele $1 million to prove Russian collusion with Trump. Why would they do that?

[ShadeRaven]

Who’s against term limits? Who’s against a code of ethics for the highest court? And who’s against rules that prevent presidents from being above the law? And why? Be specific

[blah3]

Who’s against term limits? Who’s against a code of ethics for the highest court? And who’s against rules that prevent presidents from being above the law? And why? Be specific

Well the immunity one is ridiculous. President’s need immunity or they will be neutered by fear of retribution by the opposition once out of office.
I would consider term limits IF in the same amendment there were term limits imposed on congress.
Code of ethics? By who?

[Willbacker]

Who’s against term limits? Who’s against a code of ethics for the highest court? And who’s against rules that prevent presidents from being above the law? And why? Be specific

Moving on after getting toasted I see.

Term Limits? Sure. I even like the 18 yrs idea. Thing is it starts now meaning Alito and Sotomayer still have 18 yrs. You ok with that? Now is Congress making this decision? Should be. Right? Term limits on them too. 18 yrs. DO IT!!!

Ethics? Who decides ethics. Does Legislative and Executive have this privilage of deciding? Can Judicial decide ethics on them? Or is it just the flavor of the month? Joe likes Rocky Road and Chocolate chocolate chip.