Attempt on Trump's life

[ThankyouArt!]

Not sure where it will all lead, but most of us know what is going on here.

https://x.com/SenRonJohnson/status/1819783188253646940

You're never going to get the answers......never. There could be a hundred investigations and you will never get the answers. We all know what happened. This was a hit put on Trump and it was done right in front of our faces. That's the way they operate now..........you didn't see what you thought you saw. They are going to try and make us believe that it was just a "communication" breakdown.

[ShadeRaven]

Why would the united states government recruit a mentally ill republican who cant shoot, doesnt make sense.


Speaking of political violence, ABC'S Rachel Scott recieved Death Threats after Trumps disasterous interview.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-nabj-abc-host

We need to tone down the rhetoric and you guys only turn it up.

[CarrollCoRaven]

Why would the united states government recruit a mentally ill republican who cant shoot, doesnt make sense.


Speaking of political violence, ABC'S Rachel Scott recieved Death Threats after Trumps disasterous interview.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-nabj-abc-host

We need to tone down the rhetoric and you guys only turn it up.

Will do, now fuck off.

[blueridgemtnman]

They still had time to act, but....nah.

https://x.com/BasedMikeLee/status/1819138104164225459

[CarrollCoRaven]

They still had time to act, but....nah.

https://x.com/BasedMikeLee/status/1819138104164225459

The most telling part was that the counter SS sniper had Crooks with the gun in his site but took his eye off the scope for some odd reason, not taking him out then and there. Has anyone asked the SS sniper why he did not take a gunman out as soon as he saw him with a gun or get Trump off the stage. They allowed it to happen, is the only logical explanation. All these Congressional hearings the past 4 years are a joke with the Biden Administration dancing around the truths, saying they don't know and they'll get back to them, which never happens. Nobody loses their job except the SS Director, so they bring in a clone of her lack of answering, all grade A students of CYA 101.

[ShadeRaven]

They did not shoot him when they had saw him with the range finder and AR because those are not criminal

[Captain Silver]

[ThankyouArt!]

So it's been a couple weeks since the shooting. The FBI and the CIA have all the evidence and knows exactly what happened and who is who. If this was a shooting on North Ave. They would have made the arrest already. They know every detail and yet we will have to sit here for months and wait for some "official investigation report" that will tell us nothing more then we know already.

One of the most historical events that's happened since 911 and it's already in the process of being swept under the rug. There will be no new facts that come out.........it was a big miscommunication issue. No ones fault.......no one gets fired........no one claims responsibility and we as a nation just shake our collective heads and say.......Ok.

We are the reason things are the way they are.

[CarrollCoRaven]

New Bodycam Footage Shows Police Officer Being Hoisted Onto Roof, Confronting Thomas Crooks Before He Opened Fire on Trump https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...officer-being/

[veritas]

There are only two possibilities:

1. Comical incompetence.
2. Purposeful negligence.

To have let Crooks get on the roof was bad enough. Not taking him out before he could shoot at Trump was inexcusable. Way too many DEI hires when the only thing that matters is being able to do the job. You don't want a DEI hire flying your plane or operating on you and you certainly don't want them guarding a former POTUS very likely to be POTUS again. One can only imagine the frothing in the media had someone taken a shot at Biden or Harris.

[ThankyouArt!]

There are only two possibilities:

1. Comical incompetence.
2. Purposeful negligence.

To have let Crooks get on the roof was bad enough. Not taking him out before he could shoot at Trump was inexcusable. Way too many DEI hires when the only thing that matters is being able to do the job. You don't want a DEI hire flying your plane or operating on you and you certainly don't want them guarding a former POTUS very likely to be POTUS again. One can only imagine the frothing in the media had someone taken a shot at Biden or Harris.

Right?...........like it was so bad that it was almost as if they allowed it to happen......huh?

Come on........more then one agency sees the kid walking within a 100 yards with a range finder of where Trump is about to make a speech and no one approaches him. He sets up a ladder on a building hours before the speech and n one notices it? He flies a drone over the site leading up to the speech and no one says boo. LOLOLOLOLOLOL......yup, the worst case of miscommunication in American history.

Hey man, I am selling minor shares of the Ravens for Steve Biscotti........you interested?

[ThankyouArt!]

Crooks often visited a Clartin shooting range/Gun store. He practiced often, even on holidays such as Thanksgiving and Halloween. He went the day before and practiced and went the day of to buy ammo. He asked his father for permission to use the AR15 because he was going to go practice. Crooks ALWAYS practiced with long guns.....never hand guns.

You know who else frequented the same gun range? The DHS.......Department of Homeland security, as well as many other agencies. One of them being the Secret Service. Crooks went many times a month to practice. Coincidence? This is a fact that can be readily checked........the gun range keeps records of who comes and goes..........it would not be a stretch to think that Crooks was there during the time there were DHS and other agents at the range. I don't go to a range often enough to know if it's not out of the ordinary to see the same people there often? Would it be out of place to see a 19/20 year old there by himself......often? Does this in itself raise any red flag?

I have questions for the gun range operator, has anyone notice him talking to anyone else while visiting the gun range? Do they have video of any time he was there?...........you know they do, he was there the day before the shooting. He frequented the gun range, they would know him by name.......no?

What did the parents think of this behavior of their son? NO mention of that he was an "outdoorsman".....just that he liked to shoot. The father gave him the AR!% the day of the shooting because Crooks said he was going to go practice. If that didn't seem out of the ordinary why did Crooks parents called the police worrying about Crooks persons? Crooks took the day off work, did Crooks parents know he was scheduled to work? Yet took the day off.....why? They didn't think it was odd he took the day off then asked for the AR!% to go "practice" on a day he was scheduled to work?

What was the reason the parents felt that the situation was serious enough to call the police? Did the parents tell authorities that Crooks had an AR15 when they called to express their concerns? If they did, what was the response of the police dept? Was there an APP put out on Crooks? When and if there was there was no local LEO that might have known Crooks from the gun range and started putting pieces together? Not as far as the shooting is concerned but that some local LEO knew Crooks from the gun range and heard that there was a APP of him........armed with an AR? When the Parents called authorities.....and IF they told the police Crooks had the AR the police didn't immediately get cell phone data on Crooks? He was missing armed with an AR. Don't give me this privacy bullshit. The authorities know everything we do. Everything we do is being tracked. Check his bank records to see if a card is being used? Ok.......so maybe not. However is there any mechanism in place that happens when someone calls the police about a missing person armed with an AR? When the parents are clearly concerned?

There's so many layers to this.......so many questions. For instance I want to speak to the officer that said they saw Crooks with a range finder.......did he find that unusual? He found it unusual enough to make note of it. Someone reported it. Why didn't that officer follow up and simply ask what that person was doing. Yes, it's not against the law to possess a range finder.........it's also not against the law to ask the guy why he has one and what's he doing with it. Ask him his name......he doesn't have to give it, but why not ask? If he acts strangely you put a tail on him......he now becomes a person of interest. If some hobo from Essex ( myself) can think of these questions why didn't trained LEO's think of it?

The more I think this through the more it stinks. The only explanation offered up is that there was a "breakdown of communication" on that many levels? That many agencies? Time and time again multiple agencies had this kid in their peripheral vision and they let him walk......they turned their heads.

That's what we're supposed to believe?