Page 1 of 35 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 417
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Land of Verdite
    Posts
    55,172
    Blog Entries
    1

    We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    The belief is that Lamb may hold out of training camp if he's not given a deal before it starts. I believe we should trade for him. For a number of reasons (In no particular order):


    - He may be the best WR in the league not named Justin Jefferson
    - He'd be by far the best WR Lamar's ever had to work with
    - His presence could help take our passing game to a level we didn't even see when Vinny was here and there's been a pattern over the past half decade of teams with higher quality passing games, winning titles
    - Not only would teams be unable to stack the box against us in the playoffs, but they wouldn't even be able to show stacked looks the way KC did, without taking extreme risk. It'd practically be suicide.
    - It adds high quality depth to the WR position. Right now, if anything happens to Zay, we really have nothing behind him. Now, we can withstand a potential injury and still leave Lamar with a high quality WR
    - He requires constant double teams.
    - That opens up single coverage opportunities for Zay and creates nightmarish choices in how defenses defend Likely and Andrews
    - It stretches the defense horizontally, which creates more space for the outside zone runs that Monken wants to emphasize and that Henry is known for being deadly on.
    - It creates a collection of talent which, if the line plays adequately, creates an offense that could not only near 40 PPG, but still hang around 35 PPG in the case of an injury (Andrews, for example)
    - It gives us the boundary WR we lack
    - Lamb is going to be substantially better at making contested catches than Bateman
    - On a personal note, I believe Lamar is a better passing QB than Dak
    - Now is an ideal time to pay top dollar to a WR, because if we just go the draft route in the 1st or 2nd round of 25', we're essentially conceding that either that guy or Zay will only be here for 3-4 years, because we'd create a scenario where both need contracts in a 1-2 year span
    - When Lamb's contract is nearing it's end, it'll be Zay's turn. You could then pay Zay, who should be a league-wide, no questions asked, legitimate #1 WR by then. You can then move Lamb or allow him to move on when his contract ends.
    - Lamb will have to play on his 5th year option no matter what, and based on the cap space we currently have, restructuring Lamar and including Bateman in the deal, covers his 5th year option. While we maintain other ways to create smaller levels of cap space in the case of August signings.
    - You enter the playoffs likely able to win a game throwing 40 times or running 40 times, because defenses can't truly key in on either.
    - With the space created from the fear of the passing game, Henry wouldn't have to be treated like a workhorse and could probably end up with the highest YPC of his career. You could preserve him for the long stretch.

    What you sacrifice:

    - Humphrey, whose replacement was just drafted
    - Stanley, whose replacement was just drafted
    - Ricard, whose usage diminished last year under Monken
    - Williams, who hasn't been able to stay healthy anyway.

    The only guy of note is Stephens, who may then be at risk. But in my opinion, losing Stephens is worth it if it means creating an offense of that caliber.
    "Please take with you this final sword, The Excellector. I am praying that your journey will be guided by the light", Leon Shore





  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    5,709

    Re: We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Excellector View Post
    The belief is that Lamb may hold out of training camp if he's not given a deal before it starts. I believe we should trade for him. For a number of reasons (In no particular order):


    - He may be the best WR in the league not named Justin Jefferson
    - He'd be by far the best WR Lamar's ever had to work with
    - His presence could help take our passing game to a level we didn't even see when Vinny was here and there's been a pattern over the past half decade of teams with higher quality passing games, winning titles
    - Not only would teams be unable to stack the box against us in the playoffs, but they wouldn't even be able to show stacked looks the way KC did, without taking extreme risk. It'd practically be suicide.
    - It adds high quality depth to the WR position. Right now, if anything happens to Zay, we really have nothing behind him. Now, we can withstand a potential injury and still leave Lamar with a high quality WR
    - He requires constant double teams.
    - That opens up single coverage opportunities for Zay and creates nightmarish choices in how defenses defend Likely and Andrews
    - It stretches the defense horizontally, which creates more space for the outside zone runs that Monken wants to emphasize and that Henry is known for being deadly on.
    - It creates a collection of talent which, if the line plays adequately, creates an offense that could not only near 40 PPG, but still hang around 35 PPG in the case of an injury (Andrews, for example)
    - It gives us the boundary WR we lack
    - Lamb is going to be substantially better at making contested catches than Bateman
    - On a personal note, I believe Lamar is a better passing QB than Dak
    - Now is an ideal time to pay top dollar to a WR, because if we just go the draft route in the 1st or 2nd round of 25', we're essentially conceding that either that guy or Zay will only be here for 3-4 years, because we'd create a scenario where both need contracts in a 1-2 year span
    - When Lamb's contract is nearing it's end, it'll be Zay's turn. You could then pay Zay, who should be a league-wide, no questions asked, legitimate #1 WR by then. You can then move Lamb or allow him to move on when his contract ends.
    - Lamb will have to play on his 5th year option no matter what, and based on the cap space we currently have, restructuring Lamar and including Bateman in the deal, covers his 5th year option. While we maintain other ways to create smaller levels of cap space in the case of August signings.
    - You enter the playoffs likely able to win a game throwing 40 times or running 40 times, because defenses can't truly key in on either.
    - With the space created from the fear of the passing game, Henry wouldn't have to be treated like a workhorse and could probably end up with the highest YPC of his career. You could preserve him for the long stretch.

    What you sacrifice:

    - Humphrey, whose replacement was just drafted
    - Stanley, whose replacement was just drafted
    - Ricard, whose usage diminished last year under Monken
    - Williams, who hasn't been able to stay healthy anyway.

    The only guy of note is Stephens, who may then be at risk. But in my opinion, losing Stephens is worth it if it means creating an offense of that caliber.
    God damn it ex 🤣





  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    17,829
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.






  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Blue crab country
    Posts
    2,057

    Re: We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    Agholer says "Hold my beer."
    I don't know a lot but I know a little





  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Calvert County
    Posts
    18,118
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    back on twitter

    "Well that was an appropriate last ride for Pees. A Bengals WR streaking in for a game winning touchdown in the closing minutes is the man’s preferred medium to express his art." - GreenWave52





  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Gotham City
    Posts
    51,254
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    Lamb is a great player and worth the massive contract that will eventually get. The Cowboys have told him that he will be signed. I can't see them trading him or Parsons or Dak. The Cowboys are taking 1 more shot at a Super Bowl win with this team. They're going to keep it together in 2024.





  7. #7

    We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    Quote Originally Posted by RavenXbio View Post
    God damn it ex [emoji1787]
    Sacrifice (4) All-Pro level players for a freaking WR.
    Is his post of pure drivel fan-fiction was hilarious and showed a substantial lack of salary cap/roster construction knowledge per usual.


    Maybe Zay and 2 firsts though, lol

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk





  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    5,709

    Re: We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    Quote Originally Posted by jonboy79 View Post
    Sacrifice (4) All-Pro level players for a freaking WR.
    Is his post of pure drivel fan-fiction was hilarious and showed a substantial lack of salary cap/roster construction knowledge per usual.


    Maybe Zay and 2 firsts though, lol

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    We need 10 wr and lamar on the field at all times lmao





  9. #9

    Re: We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    The idea of us paying a wide receiver the same we'll be paying two time MVP Lamar Jackson is completely asenine, but the OP does bring up some interesting players who are likely facing their last season with the Ravens.

    I think Hump might be gone. Stephens is far and away our best cornerback now and is going to get paid.

    Marcus Williams has missed at least 13 games over the last two years. We're gonna pay Hamilton (A guy I did not want us to draft) a ton of money.

    I'd cut Stanley right now if he weren't so expensive.

    Mandrews has a new contract coming up. Do we add a couple of years to let him and Likely keep scaring teams?
    "A moron, a rapist, and a Pittsburgh Steeler walk into a bar. He sits down and says, “Hi I’m Ben may I have a drink please?”
    ProFootballMock





  10. #10

    Re: We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    Quote Originally Posted by darb72 View Post
    The idea of us paying a wide receiver the same we'll be paying two time MVP Lamar Jackson is completely asenine, but the OP does bring up some interesting players who are likely facing their last season with the Ravens.

    I think Hump might be gone. Stephens is far and away our best cornerback now and is going to get paid.

    Marcus Williams has missed at least 13 games over the last two years. We're gonna pay Hamilton (A guy I did not want us to draft) a ton of money.

    I'd cut Stanley right now if he weren't so expensive.

    Mandrews has a new contract coming up. Do we add a couple of years to let him and Likely keep scaring teams?
    Good grief. We need an O-Line now more than anything.





  11. #11

    Re: We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    Do you think other boards for other teams have posters suggesting they trade for Mark Andrews or Roquan Smith?





  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    5,709

    Re: We Should Trade for CeeDee Lamb.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shrubbs View Post
    Do you think other boards for other teams have posters suggesting they trade for Mark Andrews or Roquan Smith?
    Lmao this is a great point





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Link To Mobile Site
var infolinks_pid = 3297965; var infolinks_wsid = 0; //—->