Results 49 to 60 of 523
Thread: Landry to the Saints
-
05-13-2022, 06:41 PM #49
Re: Landry to the Saints
Lamar can throw the ball, it's not a matter of him not being a good enough passer. The issue in the simplest terms as possible is that we don't have the receiving talent to combat a stacked box. Andrews is only effective between the hashes so that is where the bulk of the coverage gets focused against those run stopping alignments.
With Bateman/Hollywood/Andrews and the current OL I wouldn't have a problem. But you ship out Hollywood and now you're back to being a mediocre passing offense when teams combat our running game with numbers in the box. Teams will live with stacking the box and their CB1 on Bateman. If you have a dynamic WR2 against CB2/CB3 type guys with no help now you're creating tangible mismatches in coverage.
-
05-13-2022, 06:41 PM #50
-
05-13-2022, 06:42 PM #51
-
05-13-2022, 06:52 PM #52
Re: Landry to the Saints
Name one homegrown WR that wasn't a 1st round pick that became an impact player. This is the definition of insanity, "Boykin can be a good X, he just needs opportunities". How many times do you make the same mistake and not try something different?
We've seen enough of Duvernay/Proche to know they aren't going to be impact players. There's a role for each, they're competent, but they aren't needle movers. Tylan Wallace is the only guy in the fold that we haven't seen enough of to see what caliber of player he's going to be
The Ravens have rolled with their guys at WR multiple times in the past and it has never worked out. Banging our heads into the wall one more time isn't the solution
-
05-13-2022, 06:57 PM #53
Re: Landry to the Saints
How do I know what? That Duvernay/Proche aren't good enough to be WR2/WR3 in a Super Bowl winning offense? Because I watched them before the draft and every snap they've played in the NFL in a multi-year sample size. It's like asking how do I KNOW that Trace McSorely will never be a starting NFL QB, I'm making a very strong educated guess based on what I've evaluated.
Nobody KNOWS anything, but we can make good judgement calls based on the information/evaluation we have.
-
05-13-2022, 06:57 PM #54
-
05-13-2022, 06:58 PM #55
Re: Landry to the Saints
It's almost like we should've drafted a receiver with one of our 11 draft picks.
But clearly WR doesn't matter for this team, just look at all the deep playoff runs we keep making. It's not like you're playing good offenses/defenses in the playoffs and need to score 30+ at least a couple times.
-
05-13-2022, 07:03 PM #56
-
05-13-2022, 07:03 PM #57Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 2,152
Re: Landry to the Saints
Two things....
First, as for WRs coming here. A good, not great, WR is a fool if they dont want to play in our system. Their career would be 3 years longer than in a system like the Cardinals. Thats money in the bank.
Second, as for a top notch WR corps being a must have in todays league, IMHO thats a load of donkey dung. We dont need a great receiver, just a couple good ones. It takes 5 15 yard passes to go from our own 20 to first and goal. Thats all of 50 seconds if you utilize the sidelines. If we are using 2 and 3 TE sets our opponents almost have to put a run defense on the field. That matches those TE up against LBs and there are not a ton of really good coverage backers in the league. If they dont we will be ripping off 25 and 30 yard runs. It only takes 3 of them to be first and goal starting from our own 20.
Those who site the Chargers or Titans playoff games as examples of why our offense wont work are choosing to overlook the fact that our offense had 2 of the poorest execution games we have played since Lamars arrival. Interceptions, fumbles, missed blocks, coverage breakdowns, it was all on display those 2 games. It was like the team had never played together. Even Yanda had a poor game against the Chargers IIRC. Poor by his standards, piss poor by most players.
-
05-13-2022, 07:08 PM #58
Re: Landry to the Saints
Jonboy still holding out hope for fatboy Roman to recreate 2019 lol.
As for Landry, who cares? He wasn’t the type of WR we needed. Stop crying over a name.
We need a boundary receiver who can run fast up field. A little enthusiasm to block is a bonus.
-
05-13-2022, 07:09 PM #59
Re: Landry to the Saints
I completely agree with that. Nobody is saying they need DK Metcalf or they're hopeless in the postseason. They need multiple good WR's. Right now they have 1, the FA landscape is dry with Landry gone, the only thing left is the trade market.
Based on the previous M.O. there is very little faith they will trade for a good one. It's far more likely they will sign a guy like TY Hilton who is not going to offer much at this point in his career. They did it with Watkins, Maclin, Dez, ect.
When the Ravens strike out at WR they go into the bargain bin, call it a day, get disappointing results. Rinse and repeat. It's up to Eric to buck that cycle and do something of substance here
-
05-13-2022, 07:10 PM #60
Re: Landry to the Saints
I may be the only one in here who feels this way (can’t scroll through 5 pages of bitching to find out), but I’m kinda glad we didn’t sign Landry.
I have concerns about our depth like anyone should, but I want Proche getting targets in the slot, and that’s not happening with Landry on the roster.
Bookmarks