Results 49 to 60 of 161
Thread: Browns offseason
-
-
Re: Browns offseason
Not a lot went right for JuJu last season. Average production in an offense that throws the ball 60 times a game, talking shite on social media and having it come back to bite him in the ass... I am surprised the Ravens wanted to overpay him, but I am happy that the money went to their LT instead and that we got Bateman and Wallace at the fraction of the cost of him.
-
05-06-2021, 01:59 PM #51
-
05-06-2021, 02:28 PM #52Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2020
- Posts
- 271
Re: Browns offseason
god, funny how memory works. I completely wiped that 2019 home loss from my mind, lol. Though I hope we would agree that in that game, the defense was a far bigger issue (and that was before our offense had really hit its stride that year).
On paper, the Browns defense really did improve, and I think their offensive talent and scheme is a real challenge. It'll be an interesting challenge of our revamped receiving core vs their revamped secondary. Unless Clowney has a huge year, I think on balance their front will be worse.
-
05-06-2021, 02:55 PM #53
Re: Browns offseason
This was still a team that finished with a negative point differential last season. I think their front office is great but I still believe that Baker is a limited QB -- ideally they end up giving him a (large) 2nd contract and their cap is fucked because of it.
-
05-06-2021, 03:08 PM #54
Re: Browns offseason
This is a big part of the problem with how some folks see the Browns. They are always a threat, even when Hue was coaching them. But usually, even though the games are tight and sometimes sloppy, the Ravens win them. The close games sometimes feel like a loss. That 2019 blowout was the catalyst for possibly the greatest run of "in-season" moves a GM has ever had.
For the record, Harbaugh is 20-4 vs the Browns
Lamar is 4-1, only loss being the one referenced above.
-
05-06-2021, 06:36 PM #55
Re: Browns offseason
22 TD's and 21 INT's in 2019, if Lamar had that line the national media would've had an aneurism and declared him a bust that should just change positions already
Can the Browns be successful with a middle of the pack QB, sure. The Jets made an AFCC with Mark Sanchez, Jags made an AFCC with Bortles. But with arguably the best OL in the NFL, top 3 running game, and a stacked supporting cast so many of his flaws are covered up. Lamar had a top 3 running game as well but the difference is Lamar WAS the top 3 running game.
I don't believe he's drastically better than he was in 2019, those flaws will manifest sooner or later in the playoffs
-
05-06-2021, 06:45 PM #56Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,670
- Blog Entries
- 4
-
05-06-2021, 08:02 PM #57
Re: Browns offseason
Behind the best OL in football, with the best RB duo in football, and a very good assortment of weapons in the passing game.
They still have all of that, which is great for Baker, but the supporting cast improved more than he did imo, specifically the OL
Much like the Tannehill's and Bortles of the league, a supporting cast will only take him so far, against high level competition in the playoffs I'm of the belief that those same flaws from 2019 will manifest themselves. He didn't make a Lamar-esque leap over an offseason, he just has all day to throw and an elite running game.
-
05-06-2021, 09:22 PM #58
Re: Browns offseason
Browns have a qb with ELITE arm talent.
And he's in an offense that hides his weakness, which is reading the middle of the field due to his height.
Bakers arm is elite, but he'll never be Great unless he can Drew Brees around his height. It's rare.
If the Browns can get their defense together, they can win a ton of games. I dont know if they will ever be a superbowl contender unless Mayfield can stand and deliver from the pocket tho .
-
05-06-2021, 09:25 PM #59
Re: Browns offseason
Side note for baker haters... your literally crazy. Hes spearheaded a 1-32 team and turned them into a playoff team. If that was any non afcn team we would be fawning over him.
The idea that baker sucks is insane. If he was 6"5 he'd be terrifying
-
Bookmarks