Results 61 to 66 of 66
Thread: We could only score 3
-
-
-
-
01-25-2021, 10:36 PM #64Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
- Posts
- 5,568
Re: We could only score 3
We scored 3 and KC could have scored 50 yesterday if they wanted to. Speaks to how far away we actually are because we will have to go through KC for the foreseeable future.
-
Re: We could only score 3
Mahomes had some of the best raw talent of any QB that has come out of college. That said, let’s not forget what he was coming out- Very raw.
This isn’t just about off-season training. This is about reinforcing that and drilling it home in practice, in the film room, in the gameplan and through the offensive philosophy. This is making it clear an obvious that your QB ascending to the heights as a passer is THEE de facto priority.
Brady does not become Brady under any Coach, in any offense. It takes both. Now, Brady can go to Tampa and do his thing. But Brady ain’t becoming the GOAT under Matt Cavanaugh’s tutelage.
Patrick Mahomes isn’t becoming the best passer in the league, under Greg Roman.
Again, Mahomes had exceptional, raw talent, but he was very raw. You don’t give raw material to some Joe Schmo and get the same sword as you would from one of the world’s top blacksmiths.
-
01-25-2021, 10:45 PM #66Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 878
Re: We could only score 3
Just hearing how the coaching staff plans on basically sticking to their guns is really disheartening. You finally get a great young QB and you really don't plan on developing him into a better passer and becoming a more balanced offense? How was this not always the plan? I think a change in philosophy is in order but I get the fear of changing the team's identity.
I just feel they are going to run this kid into the ground and he'll never get a chance to reach his full potential. If this team doesn't surround him with great talent I would play out my contract if I were him.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Bookmarks