They're all laughing at you

[jonboy79]

Ok. Agree to disagree.

Do you feel the mass gatherings restrictions have infringed upon peoples right to assembly (protests, political rallies, etc.)?

No, because they were allowed to do so unfettered, often unmasked at perhaps the single worst time to assemble large gatherings of unmasked individuals:

This whole pandemic may have gone away if not for the race riots which “had to be allowed unfettered”.

Great example...

This is EXACTLY what he is getting at, picking and choosing we to follow what and whom to hurt...


Let 9 million people into a Walmart but only 4 in a restaurant... everything about the reaction to this virus is picking winners...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dade]

No. Because we’ve seen no arrest or restrictions on it this year. Or at least I haven’t.

There have been arrests.

https://www.wbtv.com/2020/04/04/arre...ortion-clinic/

[NCRAVEN]

There have been arrests.

https://www.wbtv.com/2020/04/04/arre...ortion-clinic/

If they were not breaking any other laws, I disagree with that too.

[Dade]

If they were not breaking any other laws, I disagree with that too.

I don't believe they broke any other laws. Good to know you're consistent.

You've given me some things to think about regarding the church issue.

[NCRAVEN]

I don't believe they broke any other laws. Good to know you're consistent.

You've given me some things to think about regarding the church issue.

I like to say.

I don’t think things are true because I believe them. I believe them because I think they’re true.

So I try to be consistent but if I’m not i hope people will open my eyes.

[bandc]

I like to say.

I don’t think things are true because I believe them. I believe them because I think they’re true.

So I try to be consistent but if I’m not i hope people will open my eyes.

I hope I have opened your eyes to a potential beautiful socialist future in America

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

[NCRAVEN]

I hope I have opened your eyes to a potential beautiful socialist future in America

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

Nope. Economic freedom is necessary to have any other kind of freedom. Socialism goes against that without question.

[Dade]

Agreed.

Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk

[bandc]

Nope. Economic freedom is necessary to have any other kind of freedom. Socialism goes against that without question.

What is economic freedom? How would you define it?

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

[wickedsolo]

I hope I have opened your eyes to a potential beautiful socialist future in America

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

Move to a socialist utopia. Go ahead.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[bandc]

Move to a socialist utopia. Go ahead.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would but I got a wife and kids with roots here in the states. I couldn't make them leave everything, so the next best option is to help make the U.S. a socialist utopia lol

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

[darb72]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Those two things in the First Amendment completely invalidate an order to limit the number of people in church. It also makes it unconstitutional to stop the peaceful protests from the leftist. Congregating is an expression of religious faith for Christians, Jews, and Muslims.