John Ross

**GOTA** · 10-31-2020, 08:38 AM

Originally Posted by Iamjacks

Cincinnati said they would rather get nothing for him next year than trade him this year. He must have really pissed off the team somehow.

They're going to get the potential for a comp pick so it wouldn't be nothing

**Ravenswintitle** · 10-31-2020, 09:10 AM

Not sure why they refuse to trade players but they moved Dunlap and Ross is trying his best to piss them off enough to move him. He hasn't shown much to be honest... but he's behind some pretty good talent.

**Pshawww** · 10-31-2020, 09:21 AM

Originally Posted by Iamjacks

Cincinnati said they would rather get nothing for him next year than trade him this year. He must have really pissed off the team somehow.

I doubt tweets are helping him on that front.

**stevez51** · 10-31-2020, 09:25 AM

Originally Posted by GOTA

They're going to get the potential for a comp pick so it wouldn't be nothing

They’re not going to get much for a guy who might only get a one year deal.

**QtR Nevermore** · 10-31-2020, 10:06 AM

Originally Posted by Iamjacks

Cincinnati said they would rather get nothing for him next year than trade him this year. He must have really pissed off the team somehow.

Isn't that just what Cincinnati would rather do with everyone? Why get something for a player when you can let them leave for nothing? Like Dalton last year and AJ and Geno next, they seem opposed on principle to getting a return for a player.

Dunlap had to force his way out but Green and Atkins are Cincinnati legends and may not want to sour their reputations like that.

**Raveninwoodlawn** · 10-31-2020, 10:19 AM

I'd be interested in him if the team is really trying to do the "track meet" on offense thing. I don't think he'll ever be a reliable rounded WR, but if you want to really threaten defenses with speed to try and keep them from loading the box, you won't find a much faster potential trio of Hollywood, Duvernay and Ross.

Wouldn't give up more than a conditional 7th, and next year, much higher than the minimum, but dude can fly and it's not like he's out here dropping balls.

**GOTA** · 10-31-2020, 10:36 AM

Originally Posted by stevez51

They’re not going to get much for a guy who might only get a one year deal.

They won't get anything cutting him.

**HbgPARavenfan** · 10-31-2020, 11:19 AM

Originally Posted by Culex

I think likely gets released the way Bell was. Doubt trade.

Worth a look?

Heres his best game from last season. 7 for 158 and two scores.

Great madden pickup.

**organizedchaos21** · 10-31-2020, 11:35 AM

Originally Posted by stevez51

They’re not going to get much for a guy who might only get a one year deal.

Ross' contract would still cancel out one of their signings, regardless of value.

**iceman43** · 10-31-2020, 12:31 PM

Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle

Not sure why they refuse to trade players but they moved Dunlap and Ross is trying his best to piss them off enough to move him. He hasn't shown much to be honest... but he's behind some pretty good talent.

They loved Dunlap and did it out of loyalty I think. Just like if Atkins requested a trade they would honor that IMO

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

**Iamjacks** · 10-31-2020, 08:35 PM

Originally Posted by QtR Nevermore

Isn't that just what Cincinnati would rather do with everyone? Why get something for a player when you can let them leave for nothing? Like Dalton last year and AJ and Geno next, they seem opposed on principle to getting a return for a player.

Dunlap had to force his way out but Green and Atkins are Cincinnati legends and may not want to sour their reputations like that.

I think the whole organization is like getting blown out in a game and kicking a fg as regulation expires to deprive an opponent of a shutout.