Even democrats are starting to admit the great Climate Change hoax.

**owknows** · 07-05-2020, 05:20 PM

Originally Posted by Barksdale

Lol, yeah, the side that (realises) pretends global warming is real are the ones twisting the data.

In fact they are, yes.

**Barksdale** · 07-05-2020, 05:34 PM

Originally Posted by owknows

In fact they are, yes.

No, theyre not of course. Rarely has there been such consensus between all various fields of science about what is happening and why. And we get new confirmation on an almost daily basis.

**Ortizer** · 07-05-2020, 06:57 PM

Originally Posted by blah3

It’s simple
“Dr Mann lost his case because he refused to show in open court his R2 regression numbers (the ‘working out’) behind the world-famous ‘hockey stick’ graph (shown above).”

But that’s already been posted. You simply ignore because you are a devout believer

He lost because he and his lawyer didn't try to push the case forward. Not showing his data s immaterial since he and his lawyer were not trying to advance the case.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

**darb72** · 07-05-2020, 07:22 PM

Originally Posted by Ortizer

He lost because he and his lawyer didn't try to push the case forward. Not showing his data s immaterial since he and his lawyer were not trying to advance the case.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

Mann also had to pay Dr. Ball's legal fees. That's a pretty good chunk of change to lose for not showing ones work.

**blah3** · 07-06-2020, 11:37 AM

Originally Posted by Ortizer

He lost because he and his lawyer didn't try to push the case forward. Not showing his data s immaterial since he and his lawyer were not trying to advance the case.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

Why would he not ‘push’ the case, he is the one that sued???? He claims he was slandered and yet couldn’t be bothered to show his data because he didn’t want to push the case that he brought?

**Ortizer** · 07-06-2020, 12:51 PM

Originally Posted by darb72

Mann also had to pay Dr. Ball's legal fees. That's a pretty good chunk of change to lose for not showing ones work.

Indeed, but I see nothing implying showing his work would've changed that since he and his lawyer were sitting on the case.

Would the pending legal action preclude Ball from commenting on Mann's work? If so, that could probably explain dragging it out. Apparently once the motion for dismissal was brought up they started making excuses for not taking action.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

**darb72** · 07-06-2020, 10:02 PM

Originally Posted by Ortizer

Indeed, but I see nothing implying showing his work would've changed that since he and his lawyer were sitting on the case.

Would the pending legal action preclude Ball from commenting on Mann's work? If so, that could probably explain dragging it out. Apparently once the motion for dismissal was brought up they started making excuses for not taking action.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

I thought the whole reason he lost was because he refused to show his work. Back in 2017 Mann had the case sent to adjournment. Ball's team agreed so long as Mann's team provided the data in question. For two years Mann refused to show his work despite court orders to do so. He lost and has to pay all of Ball's legal fees.