A closer look at Miles Boykin

[RevBarnes]

You know what they say...

I guess that in context this is an argument that Boykin will become a star.

[Captain Silver]

I guess that in context this is an argument that Boykin will become a star.

More likely to have his ass burned and then have a toilet dropped on him if you want to get into the context of what happened to the man who was told to leave.

[Ortizer]

Can't imagine this thread goes very many more pages before getting closed at this point. I think we're all in consensus that we're sticking a fork into boykin

So you're saying I should start Duvernay for fantasy this week?

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

[G54377]

I wish we had more draft capital, because I'm not sure there is anyone out there attainable with what we'd be willing to trade that would be better than Boykin. I doubt EDC is giving up anymore 2021 picks, particularly a 1st-2nd rounder.

[Captain Silver]

I wish we had more draft capital, because I'm not sure there is anyone out there attainable with what we'd be willing to trade that would be better than Boykin. I doubt EDC is giving up anymore 2021 picks, particularly a 1st-2nd rounder.

Dez will take his job.

[L. G. Dupre]

I wish we had more draft capital, because I'm not sure there is anyone out there attainable with what we'd be willing to trade that would be better than Boykin. I doubt EDC is giving up anymore 2021 picks, particularly a 1st-2nd rounder.

No one may want to play this game, but I am curious. What is the most you would be willing to give up, draft capital (2021 and/or 2021) and/or players, for each of the WR listed below? For this Gedankenexperiment, ignore salary cap considerations. “None”, of course, is an acceptable answer. I have tried to limit the list to names that some posters or pundits have said might be available at a price that could be reasonable to a team in the Ravens position, but feel free to add write-ins.
1. Julio Jones
2. A.C. Green
3. Michael Thomas
4. Allen Robinson
5. Kenny Golladay
6. Marvin Jones
7. Curtis Samuels
8. Dante Pettis
9. John Ross
10. Randall Cobb
11. Alshon Jeffrey
12. Jamison Crowder
13. Robbie Anderson
14. Will Fuller
15. Adam Thielen
16. Darius Slayton
17. Michael Gallup
18. D.J. Clark, Jr.
19. Sterling Sheppard
20. Golden Tate
21. Kenny Stills
22. Andy Isabella
23. Christian Kirk

[JonAB]

I've never experienced this before.
Being attacked for merely posting and discussing film and having the gall to disagree with the people that haven't watched the film as closely.

I guess i'm supposed to agree that bOyKinS suX?

Get outta here with that mess.
It's the dumbest thing ever.

If you don't want to take a close look at the film then don't.
But damn let the people that want to discuss the film do so in peace.

Start a thread call the Boykin's haters ball.
Promise i'll never post in there.

Actually a lot of people just disagree with your assessment of the film and you just reply condescendingly. But ok

[JimZipCode]

I am curious. What is the most you would be willing to give up, draft capital (2021 and/or 2021) and/or players, for each of the WR listed below? For this Gedankenexperiment, ignore salary cap considerations. “None”, of course, is an acceptable answer.

No way to be precise on something like this. I'll just take a general "tiers" whack at it:

1. Julio Jones – A lot
2. A.J. Green – None
3. Michael Thomas – A lot
4. Allen Robinson – Some+
5. Kenny Golladay – Some++
6. Marvin Jones – Some
7. Curtis Samuels – Some
8. Dante Pettis – Some I guess, but isn't he a free agent? Or is his availability just a rumor?
9. John Ross – None
10. Randall Cobb – None, but I'm worried it's a snap judgement and I should look closer at him
11. Alshon Jeffrey – None
12. Jamison Crowder – Some
13. Robbie Anderson – Some
14. Will Fuller – Some
15. Adam Thielen – Some
16. Darius Slayton – Some
17. Michael Gallup – Some
18. D.J. Chark, Jr. – Some
19. Sterling Shepard – Eh. More than "none". Some-minus
20. Golden Tate – Some
21. Kenny Stills – Not much
22. Andy Isabella – None
23. Christian Kirk – Some, or more

[JimZipCode]

Actually a lot of people just disagree with your assessment of the film and you just reply condescendingly.

I haven't seen anyone engage with Ed on the film. They just say "Boykin sux and stop talking about film cuz I don't want to hear it."

(A broad generality, of course.)

[Shas]

I haven't seen anyone engage with Ed on the film. They just say "Boykin sux and stop talking about film cuz I don't want to hear it."

(A broad generality, of course.)

Broad to the point of being false.

Most of us are taking a wait and see attitude (acknowledging the good but pointing out where the film reveals issues) Broadly speaking, the reaction to us pointing out these issues is, "stop saying Boykin is a bust, you're clearly not looking at the film."

And so we go 'round and round.

Even Edr says he needs more reps, so why this thread keeps getting pushed to near 1000 comments--as if there is a correct conclusion to be made at this juncture on his level of play--is vexing.

[HbgPARavenfan]

No one may want to play this game, but I am curious. What is the most you would be willing to give up, draft capital (2021 and/or 2021) and/or players, for each of the WR listed below? For this Gedankenexperiment, ignore salary cap considerations. “None”, of course, is an acceptable answer. I have tried to limit the list to names that some posters or pundits have said might be available at a price that could be reasonable to a team in the Ravens position, but feel free to add write-ins.
1. Julio Jones
2. A.C. Green
3. Michael Thomas
4. Allen Robinson
5. Kenny Golladay
6. Marvin Jones
7. Curtis Samuels
8. Dante Pettis
9. John Ross
10. Randall Cobb
11. Alshon Jeffrey
12. Jamison Crowder
13. Robbie Anderson
14. Will Fuller
15. Adam Thielen
16. Darius Slayton
17. Michael Gallup
18. D.J. Clark, Jr.
19. Sterling Sheppard
20. Golden Tate
21. Kenny Stills
22. Andy Isabella
23. Christian Kirk

Galloday is worth a 1. Isabella is worth a 4th

[edromeo]

...
Most of us are taking a wait and see attitude (acknowledging the good but pointing out where the film reveals issues)

Lol, what you say above isn’t even a remotely true summary of this thread.

...Broadly speaking, the reaction to us pointing out these issues is, "stop saying Boykin is a bust, you're clearly not looking at the film."

Man, it’s hard to give you the benefit of the doubt in regards to how you interpret this thread. But what you have said is so far from the truth that this take seems to be a purposeful misrepresentation.

.. Even Edr says he needs more reps, so why this thread keeps getting pushed to near 1000 comments--as if there is a correct conclusion to be made at this juncture on his level of play--is vexing.

Lol, you’re upset this thread keeps going? Yet you keep posting in it.

The point of this thread is to assess the film. PERIOD. The only correct conclusion possible is an accurate assessment and discussion of the film. And that was happening prior to the troll onslaught. And i will continue to discuss and assess the film.

How people react to film discussion is their problem.