Results 145 to 156 of 229
Thread: Jamal Adams
-
Re: Jamal Adams
on that note Marcus Allen was an effective at what 200?
-
06-02-2020, 01:57 PM #146Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 1,165
Re: Jamal Adams
I agree with the comparison, but it seems clear the path for this young man to make the team is crush it on special teams and show the ability to become Juszczyk like for the offense. The USFA flier makes sense seeing the numbers and the comparable/ceiling; we’ll all see how it shakes out.
On topic love Adams and the Ravens did allegedly try for him last year. My guess is Thomas would be the odd man out, but logistically that’s going to be tough dollar wise without moving Judon (Thomas gone after this coming season) or getting other cap relief (I’m not too smart there 🤷*♂️). Another article made the point that Adams would preclude at least 1-2 other risers from getting paid (Stanley, Humphrey, keeping judon after this year, Andrews, Hollywood, etc.).
Reason the team works is players outperforming rookie deals and signing good grit players to fair affordable deals (Richard, Clark). It’s going to continue to be really interesting to watch our GM work!
-
06-02-2020, 05:29 PM #147
Re: Jamal Adams
Adams is probably better than almost everyone mentioned... PFF #20 overall for 2020, 2019 #7 in Non-QB WAR
ESPN reported the other day Stanley likely to get largest ever non-QB contract...
Tough decisions, but if you can get a player of Adams quality you kind of have to get him.
BTW Lamar is #8 on the PFF top 50, just after Russel Wilson @7, Mahomes @2. Not bad being that their initial starting point was 2018/2019 2 year average grade.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
06-02-2020, 06:53 PM #148
Re: Jamal Adams
Who were the six above him? Is that public data?
ESPN reported the other day Stanley likely to get largest ever non-QB contract...
Tough decisions, but if you can get a player of Adams quality you kind of have to get him.
If they can somehow talk the Jets into say, a 2nd and 3rd rounder + Deshon Elliott, they essentially get two years of prime Jamal Adams for a 2nd round pick and (maybe) two years of Elliott.
-
06-02-2020, 07:05 PM #149
Re: Jamal Adams
I don’t pay for their data and don’t believe this is public. I watch them on YouTube primarily.
They just put out a podcast yesterday with the top 50 of 2020.
The WAR number came from videos about the potential landing spots in trade scenarios from a couple weeks ago.
David Bakhtiari maybe can disagree with that statement, maybe. Regardless, Stanley is on the short list for the conversation and the ONLY one on that short list entering his prime instead of exiting it.
I think, it would be pretty imperative to sign him long term. I don’t believe it would cost us Stanley or Hump but would likely cost us Judon. Also, would likely end ET’s stay here prematurely(perhaps next offseason, certainly by the following offseason when Adams contract would explode up to the $15/16m range.
I don’t believe the Jets will move him without a first round pick involved.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
06-03-2020, 02:16 AM #150
-
06-03-2020, 02:42 AM #151
-
06-03-2020, 03:23 AM #152
-
06-03-2020, 05:10 AM #153Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Westminster, Md
- Posts
- 2,854
-
06-03-2020, 07:58 AM #154
-
06-03-2020, 10:45 AM #155
Re: Jamal Adams
31, but they made a point to say that his “down year” due to injuries etc was pulling him down but they prior year they had them back to back. JA brings a bit more as an edge rusher, while Derwin brings a bit more deep CF. Minor degrees but that’s how they separate them ever so slightly.
Looking back, I’d we somehow could have gotten Derwin, Lamar, Mandrews and Zeus2 that would have been the best draft ever, and that’s not entirely outlandish.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
06-03-2020, 11:24 AM #156
Re: Jamal Adams
Dude. Wilson is a 7x Pro Bowler and a 2x Super Bowl QB with one win. He was Rookie of the Year. Lead the league in Passer Rating.
Lamar’s just getting started...don’t let your Purple Glasses cloud your football vision. In no world is Lamar “better” than Wilson. Atleast not yet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bookmarks