Page 16 of 16 FirstFirst ... 141516
Results 181 to 186 of 186
  1. #181

    Re: Possible shocking news

    Y’all bullies





  2. #182

    Re: Possible shocking news

    Quote Originally Posted by Mmcclend View Post
    I guess the guy who wrote this article must be a bozo too?

    https://russellstreetreport.com/2020...-in-baltimore/
    If he thinks Earl had a subpar season last year, then absolutely.





  3. #183

    Re: Possible shocking news

    Even after the stats prove someone to be wrong, they still are looking for irrational ways to defend an indefensible position.

    Again...

    110 coverage yards allowed and SIX completions allowed in 547 coverage snaps all season long.

    Only once every 39 dropbacks was the ball thrown to the receiver he was covering.

    When it was, his passer rating was 24.2, best in the league.

    He allowed 4 coverage yards over his last six starts.

    If after that, you are still of the opinion he is not a talented HOF caliber safety playing at a high level, then there is really not much hope in convincing you of his rare talents.





  4. #184

    Re: Possible shocking news

    Quote Originally Posted by LukeDaniel View Post
    If he thinks Earl had a subpar season last year, then absolutely.
    He thinks that, but at least Tony said that it was his personal opinion instead of some objective truth.
    Let's win the f**king game.
    Joe Flacco





  5. #185
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    near Asheville, NC
    Posts
    12,194

    Re: Possible shocking news

    Quote Originally Posted by LukeDaniel View Post
    Even after the stats prove someone to be wrong, they still are looking for irrational ways to defend an indefensible position.
    Human behavior at its finest.
    "It's gonna be a problem. Whether Lamar Jackson runs it or not, it's gonna be a problem."
    - Brian Baldinger





  6. #186

    Re: Possible shocking news

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarcasticfury View Post
    He thinks that, but at least Tony said that it was his personal opinion instead of some objective truth.
    Yeah, I don't really get the approach.

    What I saw was a guy who was pretty decent in coverage...
    ^^^^^^^^^
    Things like this from TL's piece.

    He doesn't say if he actually did a study of the film, or or if he watched Earl specifically on every play he lined up. Assuming he didn't do those things, then the opinion is like saying, "Well, the thermometer outside says it's 82 degrees, but in my opinion it's 76." The ball didn't go Earl's way very much, so unless you were actually specifically watching him on all the plays, then how do you know how well he did?

    And if he DID do any kind of analysis, then it would be good to share the results, and why they differ from the published facts.

    Or maybe "pretty decent" means something entirely different to TL that normal usage. But I don't think it's possible to have any objective measure of ET's performance in coverage where it doesn't rise past the level of pretty decent.
    "Not bad for a running back."





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Link To Mobile Site