Results 37 to 48 of 219
Thread: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
-
03-27-2020, 08:26 AM #37
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
They had 6.9 mil in cap space and designated Gurley for post June 1st cut which saves 5.5 mil, but I believe they still need to be under the cap at June 1st. Even at a 5 mil cap year 1, that puts the Rams at 1.9 mil in cap. The Rams would likely need to restructure, cut, or trade in order to be able to fit the draft prospects cap in even with the rookie salary cap. I could see Robert Woods going on the trade block as trading Cooks would lose cap and Cooper Kupp is cheap anyway.
-
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
Sure they’ll have to make some moves...keep in mind though they don’t have a first or 5th round pick so their rookies won’t take up as much cap space.
Brockers cap number could be even lower than $5 million this year if they really wanted to keep it as low as possible. They have a while to go to get there though, they don’t need to do anything now.Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
03-27-2020, 08:35 AM #39
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
While this sucks, we can bring in Daniels, Snacks, or Hankins for 1/3 of the cost per year.
Keep in mind, we still got Campbell!
-
03-27-2020, 08:37 AM #40
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
The lack of picks is another reason I could see them moving Woods for a pick considering how strong this receiver draft is. They're also in the bottom half of the league in 2021 salary cap without the Brockers deal and they need to pay Ramsey or their fan base riots. Woods carries a 10M cap next year which gives them more future flexibility.
-
03-27-2020, 08:45 AM #41Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Rockville, MD
- Posts
- 1,252
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
He ended up getting more $ from the Rams. Very strange.
I’m sure EDC will put the $ to good use. No clue who’s out there to help but don’t like to add another hole before the draft.
-
03-27-2020, 08:48 AM #42
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Greensboro, North Carolina
- Posts
- 10,031
- Blog Entries
- 3
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
Dream scenario is they figure out how to get Yannick from the Jags and sign him to a long term deal.
-
03-27-2020, 08:49 AM #43Rookie Poster
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 23
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
What about Shelby Harris from DEN? 29 YO, 6 sacks in 2019. Said to be available for ~ $5 Million/ year.
-
03-27-2020, 08:51 AM #44
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
Trade for Ryan Kerrigan, trade up for a falling Derrick Brown or Javon Kinlaw, championship.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
Well that’s def a strange turn of events.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkDisclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
03-27-2020, 08:52 AM #46Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Westminster, Md
- Posts
- 2,854
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
You have to figure EDC has a plan. There was no rush to drop the deal for Brockers so early unless it was his agent pushing for the deal to be signed.
-
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
Christian Covington
Young/Good run stopper
-
Bookmarks