Results 145 to 156 of 219
Thread: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
-
03-27-2020, 03:38 PM #145
-
03-27-2020, 03:48 PM #146Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 321
-
03-27-2020, 03:49 PM #147Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Posts
- 2,005
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
I'm glad they were able to get out of the deal just wish they had more options at this point.
Should've signed Schobert. A young FA who could grow with the defense. Last offseason the splash move was signing a 30 year old safety and this offseason a 33 year old lineman.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
-
-
03-27-2020, 03:56 PM #149
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
Shelby Harris is who I would want.
-
03-27-2020, 03:58 PM #150Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
- Posts
- 16,938
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
Wow, I woke up to this being the only alert on my phone today and this move sucks.
I loved the initial signing, its a shame this fell through. I mean I do not see or beleive the Ravens had legitimate interest in Ndamukung Sue.
I cannot also think they held off on the ankle issue for a guy who has missed what 5 games in 6 years? THe guy at a really tough position has been incredibly healthy and reliable.
Looks like the draft will have to now address this hole. I think the subtraction of Wormley is irrelevant and replaceable with a rookie or any free agent but Brockers was a definite upgrade and there is not anyone on the market as good as he was.
-
03-27-2020, 04:08 PM #151
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
5 games in 8 years actually. He’s been extremely durable.
-
03-27-2020, 04:12 PM #152
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
Clowney played in the postseason so I'd be happy with him
-
03-27-2020, 04:21 PM #153Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Posts
- 2,005
-
03-27-2020, 05:09 PM #154Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,670
- Blog Entries
- 4
-
-
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
I think we both agree that AJ is a great college prospect and good player.
At Iowa he was base 43 RDE. A DE in a 4 man DL is his natural position to me based on watching film and from the write-ups I've read.
Most write-ups that I've read comp him to an edge rusher.
This conversation started about AJ as replacement for Brockers and I do not see him as direct replacement for Brockers.
If this is how you see him we can agree to disagree.
Wait whut? Now i'm confused...... You're not sure why anyone would say that a edge rusher (RDE) in college plays like an edge rusher?
Bookmarks