Results 205 to 216 of 219
Thread: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
-
03-28-2020, 03:42 PM #205
-
03-28-2020, 04:20 PM #206
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
I think EDC remains aggressive. Ozzie missed on some players in free agency except for steve smith and weddle. but wow he really messed up with that matt elam pick in the draft. the only pick he hit on, was the 2017 draft with humph, 2018 and 2014 draft. and could not sign good free agents. mainly also for that massive contract. and then somehow resigned players he shouldn't have like jefferson. it was time for ozzie to go lol. i think edc has someone in mind.
-
03-28-2020, 08:16 PM #207
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
You mention Wolfe having a career year but so did Brockers before last year he was primarily known as a run stuffer. So the question is what changed? To me it's obvious the previous year Suh lined up inside next to Donald. Last year Brockers did. We don't have an Aaron Donald and paying for that production and hoping it translates next to Williams to me always was the wrong move.
Snack and Dareus did have down years but both are capable of playing to Brockers level and won't demand longterm deals. I don't like devoting 20m of the cap to Williams and Brockers. I think the smart play is what we did with Wolfe and hopefully we sign one more guy who is capable of bouncing back from a down year and get someone in the draft.
-
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
"When you go into the lions den, you don't tippy-toe in. You carry a spear. You go in screaming like a banshee and say, 'Where's the son of a bitch?""
- Brian Billick - postgame after beating Titans in Divisional playoff 2001
Twitter handle: @radams8483
-
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
I stated that Derek Wolfe had a career year sack wise in 2019 but for the most part he didn't have a career year. According to PFF Micheal Brockers had one of his better seasons last year in which he had 3 sacks even though his career best sack wise has been 5. Brockers is a solid run defender if not a pretty good run defender that brings a little juice to the pass rushing game. You can try to compare him to Snack and Dareus as much as you want but the reality is that Brocker was a better than them last year and this is a what have you done for me lately type league. Snacks and Dareus are both big guys that weigh more than 315 pounds while a guy like Brockers weighs about 305 pound and can play at nose tackle and defensive end. He is more athletic then those guys which is exactly what The Ravens wanted and probably why they decided to move on from Micheal Pierce.
It's easy to say that Snack and Dareus are capable of playing to Brockers level but the reality is that one was considering retirement after a down at the age of 31 and the other has always been inconsistent with his performance and never really leave up to his first round status as his previous team expected. There really is no guarantee with either one and Brockers cap number was only suppose to be 5 million in 2019 if he was going to be a Raven which isn't high in my opinion.
-
-
03-29-2020, 11:05 AM #211Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Baltimore
- Posts
- 2,273
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
honestly i think i'm happier with an iDL that can get sacks and costs less than a better-overall iDL run-stopper. i really think the D needed to be retooled this offseason to play complementary to the O. we had early leads most games last season (especially down the stretch). teams were pass-heavy after Q1 to get back into the game. with this O, give me a team that can rush the passer over a team that can stop the run any day
-
03-29-2020, 11:19 AM #212Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,631
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
Originally Posted by RavensNest
Just resign Peko
-
03-29-2020, 12:28 PM #213
-
03-29-2020, 08:34 PM #214Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Jan 2018
- Posts
- 3,660
Re: Ravens NOT signing Brockers
I agree except for this one amateur observation. Last year we controlled games by keeping the other team's offense off the field. Ironically, we were vulnerable to teams that could run and keep our offense off the field. Brockers, Cambell and Williams would have made it very difficult for anyone to run on us.
-
03-29-2020, 09:16 PM #215Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,631
- Blog Entries
- 4
-
03-29-2020, 11:30 PM #216Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,651
Bookmarks