Results 1 to 12 of 52
Hybrid View
-
03-25-2020, 08:32 PM #1
Brockers deal delayed by ankle issue
Looks like the Brockers deal is being delayed by the fact that Ravens medical staff can't get a look at Brockers ankle...
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...rs-deal-ravens
-
03-25-2020, 08:41 PM #2
Re: Brockers deal delayed by anke issue
We could probably end up with Clowney after all if this one doesn't go through
-
03-25-2020, 08:56 PM #3
Re: Brockers deal delayed by anke issue
Now's not the time to be messing around with the money. That'll really hurt the Ravens reputation around the league with the agents, and by extension the players.
Question should be, do they sign him Y/N
-
03-25-2020, 09:05 PM #4
-
03-25-2020, 09:11 PM #5Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Posts
- 174
Re: Brockers deal delayed by anke issue
Players wanna play here. Why is Tony Jefferson recruiting players to come here when he got cut? Why did Steve Smith and Eric Weddle want to retire a Raven? I don't think this has hurt them. They need to protect themselves or else if he was injured the first three weeks Ravens fans would complain that they shouldn't have signed him.
-
03-26-2020, 02:39 AM #6Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Glen Burnie
- Posts
- 2,029
- Blog Entries
- 3
-
03-26-2020, 02:47 AM #7Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Glen Burnie
- Posts
- 2,029
- Blog Entries
- 3
Re: Brockers deal delayed by anke issue
If the Ravens can't have their Drs look at him soon, I would like to see the contract reworked to $6m guaranteed, and $4m in incentives and the Ravens have the option to get out of the contract after 1 year with minimal dead money.
-
03-26-2020, 04:15 AM #8
Re: Brockers deal delayed by anke issue
Campbell and Brockers...the combination of the players together is something that added allure to the former Ram. The team wanted to move away from pure run-stuffers like Pierce, and the Campbell/Brockers combo, disrupting the pocket inside the edge rushers, made Wormley expendable.
But the red flag was hoisted when out of the blue the Ravens were in on Suh. And that didn't play out for the Ravens as he stayed in Tampa.
Adding the right pieces in free agency liberates the Ravens war room. They don't feel as compelled to reach for need. If the Ravens doctors can't get comfortable with Brockers (and they do rely on them as mentioned earlier in the Ryan Grant case), the need could influence their draft board, not to mention the depth they've lost in Wormley.
Sometimes the medical report can sway the team to make the right choice. Sometimes it doesn't. I remember in 2010 the Ravens took Gronk off their board due to medical concerns, yet invested draft capital in two tight ends anyway (Dickson & Pitta). I remember there was some mild interest in Drew Brees in 2006 but they passed due to concerns about his shoulder. Fourteen years later he's still chucking it. Steve McNair would become a Raven prior to that season.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. If Brockers passes the physical, then all is ok. If he doesn't, and given the attempt to sign Suh there's concern that he won't, it would be DeCosta's first swing and a miss as General Manager.
Hopefully we'll learn soon.
Hopefully it works out for the team's very savvy GM!Last edited by TL24x7; 03-26-2020 at 04:37 AM.
Follow me on Twitter @RSRLombardi
-
03-26-2020, 05:24 AM #9Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Posts
- 6,759
-
03-25-2020, 09:11 PM #10
-
03-25-2020, 09:16 PM #11
Re: Brockers deal delayed by anke issue
Yeah, I don’t think they cut the money here. I think they decide they’re comfortable signing him at the agreed upon rate or they’re not.
-
03-25-2020, 09:17 PM #12Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 2,459
Re: Brockers deal delayed by anke issue
Same ankle issue Ryan Grant was suffering from?
Bookmarks