Results 13 to 24 of 137
Thread: Impeachment notes & tidbits
-
01-23-2020, 10:48 AM #13Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Posts
- 7,006
Re: Impeachment notes & tidbits
This is all you need to know.
"Barely two weeks after Donald Trump took office, Eric Ciaramella – the CIA analyst whose name was recently linked in a tweet by the president and mentioned by lawmakers as the anonymous “whistleblower” who touched off Trump’s impeachment – was overheard in the White House discussing with another staffer how to remove the newly elected president from office, according to former colleagues."
This was when all the various coups were being plotted by the treasonous weasel hanger ons from the previous administration. i.e. Russian Collusion etc.. The idea was just come up with any excuse to to investigate then throw any and all sh** at the wall and hope Trump makes a mistake. Then it's on to the BS "obstruction" etc.. So many BS process crimes is basically what they came up with. Oh, and let's indict a bunch of people in Russia just to make it all seem legit.
Case dismissed.
-
-
Re: Impeachment notes & tidbits
The partial non-transcript (it even says it's not a transcript) shows Trump pushing for unfounded investigations. Zelensky spells out what he understood the quid pro quo to be at the time on page 5.
Volcker texted Zelensky's aid 30 minutes before the call took place spelling out the White-House-meeting-for-investigations deal, too.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
-
01-23-2020, 03:02 PM #16Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 9,085
-
01-23-2020, 03:21 PM #17
Re: Impeachment notes & tidbits
unfounded investigation?
He asked Zelensky to look into 2016 election interference. If that was unfounded, then what the hell are you talking about? Also, looking into matters of corruption that involve US/Ukraine is legally permissable per the agreement put into law by WJC in the 90's. So, it's well within ANY President's authority to bring up matters of corruption on a phone call with Ukraine's President. If Biden wasn't running for President, would it be ok then? Is it only because he's running for President that you think this was nefarious? I'd be curious to hear your answer on this one.
Ukraine is listed as one of the most corrupt countries on the planet and we've been been blindly giving them hundred of billions of taxpayer dollars for a long time and they were suposedly "losing" it while American politician's families were getting kickbacks. Sounds like this is certainly worth bringing up during a conversation.
everybody that signed off on the transcript says its what every presidential transcript looks like
+
everybody that was on the call says that the transcript was correct
+
everybody that was actually on the call says there was no quid pro quo
=
Stop listening to the assholes on TV. They are lying to you.
PS
Democrat Senators Menendez, Durbin, and Leahy wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor in 2018 general stating that US assistance to Ukraine was at stake if they didn't help investigate Trump.
Did you know that?Last edited by ravenmaniac4life; 01-23-2020 at 04:37 PM.
-
01-23-2020, 03:52 PM #18Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2019
- Posts
- 3,074
-
Re: Impeachment notes & tidbits
He asked for investigations into the Bidens, which had what to do with the 2016 election? That investigation is unfounded. To date there's still no allegation of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden, and the only allegation against Joe Biden was known to be false when it was first made.
The only other investigation Trump asked for was into Crowdstrike and Crowdstrike hiding "the server" in Ukraine. This is an insane and stupid conspiracy theory. "The server" Trump babbles about is the supposed DNC server that was hacked by the Russians. This lunatic conspiracy theory has it that Ukraine did the hacking and that Crowdstrike is owned by a Ukrainian and is covering up for Ukraine. This nutjob claim either originated with Giuliani and Firtash or it's just Russian propaganda (Putin has put it forward personally). Crowdstrike is an American company and there was no one "the server" for the DNC's systems. More than just Crowdstike identified Russia as the hacker, moreover. Dutch intel literally watched Russia in real time (they'd hacked Russia).
So, yes. The investigations Trump wanted announced were and are baseless.
To pound that point home, what he and his fan base are trying to believe needed investigation would also be violations if U.S. law. If Biden corruptly abused his position to help his son he would be subject to indictment. If Crowdstrike covered up a Ukrainain hack of the DNC they would have obstructed justice. Yet there was and is no U.S. investigation of these things despite Trump's appointees directing every law enforcement and intelligence agency we have. The DOJ wasn't any part of Trump's efforts to get Ukraine to investigate.
everybody that signed off on the transcript says its what every presidential transcript looks like
+
everybody that was on the call says that the transcript was correct
+
everybody that was actually on the call says there was no quid pro quo
=
Stop listening to the assholes on TV. They are lying to you.
Zelensky spells out the quid pro quo on page 5 of the "transcript."
I came to my views by listening and reading the testimony and looking at the original sources, something you obviously haven't done.
PS
Democrat Senators Menendez, Durbin, and Leahy wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor in 2018 general stating that US assistance to Ukraine was at stake if they didn't help investigate Trump.
Did you know that?
https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/m...estigation.pdf
It looks like you're the one who needs to quit listening to the assholes on TV.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
-
01-23-2020, 04:38 PM #20Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2019
- Posts
- 3,074
-
Re: Impeachment notes & tidbits
He's confessed and denied it. The "transcript" confirms the claims. The Volker text to Yermak 30 minutes before the July 25th phone call also states the quid pro quo of a White House meeting for investigations that Zelensky lays out on page 5 of the "transcript."
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
-
-
-
01-23-2020, 04:54 PM #24
Re: Impeachment notes & tidbits
I think Republicans made a huge mistake not speaking more the last two days. Democrats are getting their narrative out there with not much in the way of a rebuttal.
It's much harder to change someones mind then get them to form an opinion. I thought things would be different in the senate but it seems pelosi is running the senate too
Bookmarks