Results 1 to 12 of 25
Thread: It's good to be right! 2020
-
01-06-2020, 02:38 PM #1Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,653
It's good to be right! 2020
Forum posters here LOVE to spout their dumb opinions and make foolish predictions. You guys don't know nuthin.
Let's take a quick stroll thru 2019; I'll show ya'll how it's really done.
Stay tuned. Plenty more insights exactly as good as those, coming from me in 2020!
-
01-06-2020, 02:44 PM #2Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Posts
- 7,048
Re: It's good to be right! 2020
I like your honesty here. Had you accurately predicted what we got actually got this year at the beginning of the season people would have thought you were off your lithium.
-
01-06-2020, 02:49 PM #3Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Jan 2018
- Posts
- 3,661
Re: It's good to be right! 2020
I said Seiler could become a poor man's JJ Watt, based on certain similarities in their college career. I still want him back on the Ravens so I can be right. Sigh.
-
01-06-2020, 03:37 PM #4
Re: It's good to be right! 2020
You stink at this, I think we get it.
Just kidding, much respect. It would look like a John Reglaperson post if I listed everything I got wrong.
-
01-06-2020, 04:33 PM #5Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,653
-
Re: It's good to be right! 2020
I predicted 13-3 and the number 1 seed. I know someone else who said LJ would become the MVP. Obviously this was on a bold statements thread, but pretty accurate.
-
01-06-2020, 09:10 PM #7
-
01-06-2020, 11:44 PM #8Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,653
-
01-06-2020, 11:57 PM #9Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,653
Re: It's good to be right! 2020
Goddamit!
We were comfortably sliding into home with 55% runs. Then we have to run out the clock in a totally meaningless game with our best offensive players taking a bye. That 65% rushing in game 16 pushed our season average up to 56%.
Looks like I need to find & add a quote into the OP of this thread.
-
01-07-2020, 12:00 AM #10
Re: It's good to be right! 2020
I thought Boykin and Hollywood would be chronically injured.
I thought Moore would be a stud.
I thought Hayden Hurst and Andrews would have roughly even stats.
I thought Peanut would put up monster games.
I thought Daylon Mack would be disruptive along the line.
I thought Jefferson would bounce back with ET back there.
I thought Lamar would probably max out at 3 passing TDs in a game all season.
I thought Shane Ray would hit 5-6 sacks.
I thought Tim Williams would hit 8-9 sacks.
I thought Tyus Bowser would hit 9-10 sacks.
I thought Zach Sieler would hit 10-15 sacks. Just kidding. Sort of.
Ugh.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
01-07-2020, 12:47 AM #11
Re: It's good to be right! 2020
?
because long posts?
I should point out that, although it's really hard for me to find my old posts, I had the Ravens as doing as well with Lamar this year as they did with Lamar last year, which meant 12-2, and 2 games were question marks. Pretty much everything the Ravens did this year - like breaking the rushing records especially, maybe not the multiple 158.3s and the demolishing of good teams with 40something to single digit scores - didn't really come as a surprise. The loss to the Browns was a surprise. Defense was a bit of a problem initially, that was somewhat foreseeable. Sometimes "next man up" at 3 positions leaves the defense a little weaker.
Would like to see something that I wrote that was flat out wrong, way off base. With all the words I type there should be huge chunks of really wrong, but I can't think of them. Draft Malcolm Perry. That could turn out to not happen. Often requests aren't answered. But that's one to look at, to see how that one goes in the future. Combine and pro day numbers for Perry, Bowden, Tate, running QBs for Navy, Kentucky, Arizona. Plenty of top tier running QBs (at running) get no shot at playing QB in the NFL. The eye test says all 3 are great runners, I'd like to see numbers.
-
01-07-2020, 12:52 AM #12
Re: It's good to be right! 2020
I thought it would be nice to see Daylon Mack, because he ran for TDs in high school, do something similar to Patrick Ricard. Still do. I didn't predict that Mack would actually be used in that role. It does still seem to me that a 6'1 330+ pound DT should be a good run blocker, at OL or in the backfield. It's possible that doing that might be one of those "run wrinkles in reserve" for the playoffs. The Ravens have 5 guys that basic size. Pierce has the crazy high sparq of the big DTs.
Bookmarks