Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 63
  1. #13

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    Quote Originally Posted by purple_city39 View Post
    His example of why he believes this foolishness is that Cam Newton is basically broken due to all the contact. Besides the huge difference in Cam and Lamar's running styles, if Cam is his example then there's an easy counter.....Andrew Luck.

    Luck came in the league a year AFTER Cam and had already retired because of the beating he took that led to multiple injuries. Hell, Lamar's only injury this year, although minor, happened from a hit in the pocket. And even if Lamar stops running, he's still a better pocket passer than Darnold
    I think RG3 is more comparable to Cam and we saw it when RG3 came in last night. Both Cam and RG3 are reckless when they take hits. Cam also was never as fast, he was elusive...but his elusiveness was based on his strength and size and ability to break tackles like Big Ben more than his raw speed. At this point, I'm a little irritated by the constant obsession with him getting hurt.





  2. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    near Asheville, NC
    Posts
    25,007

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    Quote Originally Posted by NC Raven View Post
    Its the click that counts, not the content.

    If you clicked on that, you're the fool, not him.
    At some point it really comes down to this.

    I didn't click the link btw





  3. #15

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    Quote Originally Posted by NC Raven View Post
    Its the click that counts, not the content.

    If you clicked on that, you're the fool, not him.
    This. Why do people still care about what no name "analysts" think?

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk





  4. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    18,848

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    Quote Originally Posted by WNCRavensFan View Post
    At some point it really comes down to this.

    I didn't click the link btw
    I refuse to click it as well. Don't reward a toddler for throwing a temper tantrum.





  5. #17

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    It's just clickbait, I doubt these guys actually believe this shit. The idea is just that it grabs your attention, they care more about the clicks than journalistic integrity





  6. #18

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    Quote Originally Posted by RavenDomination View Post
    I think RG3 is more comparable to Cam and we saw it when RG3 came in last night. Both Cam and RG3 are reckless when they take hits. Cam also was never as fast, he was elusive...but his elusiveness was based on his strength and size and ability to break tackles like Big Ben more than his raw speed. At this point, I'm a little irritated by the constant obsession with him getting hurt.
    RGIII looked really bad last night. If McSorley improves, he could be the #2 next year. In fact, if they clinch the #1 seed against the Browns, I might start McSorley against the Steelers, because I'm not sure RGIII can make it through that game uninjured.
    "This space for rent" - Roger Goodell





  7. #19

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    As to long term health and durability of Darnold vs. LJ, Darnold has already missed 6 games due to illness or injury.





  8. #20

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    Quote Originally Posted by RavenDomination View Post
    I think RG3 is more comparable to Cam and we saw it when RG3 came in last night. Both Cam and RG3 are reckless when they take hits. Cam also was never as fast, he was elusive...but his elusiveness was based on his strength and size and ability to break tackles like Big Ben more than his raw speed. At this point, I'm a little irritated by the constant obsession with him getting hurt.
    The dude could win 5 Super Bowls and after the 5th the pundits that night on ESPN and FS1 would just be saying "yeah that's all great, but is it sustainable?". So stupid.





  9. #21

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    Darnold is a turnover machine





  10. #22

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    Quote Originally Posted by ActionJackson8 View Post
    https://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/co...lamar-jackson/

    Thank you hater. And keep the hate coming please please PLEASE.

    This is the FUEL (along with the snub going 32) that is driving our Super Bowl run
    That's clown talk.

    We have the Michael Phelps of QBs right now. This season. Stupid thing to say.





  11. #23

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    Quote Originally Posted by HbgPARavenfan View Post
    Darnold is a turnover machine
    Fumble and a pick - just last night.

    Unfortunately we didn't make him see ghosts.





  12. #24

    Re: Gottlidweeb would still take Sam Darnold over Lamar

    Quote Originally Posted by mmi16 View Post
    Fumble and a pick - just last night.

    Unfortunately we didn't make him see ghosts.
    Yeah, that was the Patriots. I wonder what film they had on him and the Jets.





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Link To Mobile Site
var infolinks_pid = 3297965; var infolinks_wsid = 0; //—->