Hillary cleared on corruption (Again x3)

**Cornelious** · 10-22-2019, 06:48 AM

"State Dept. Inquiry Into Clinton Emails Finds No Deliberate Mishandling of Classified Information

WASHINGTON — A yearslong State Department investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server found that while the use of the system for official business increased the risk of compromising classified information, there was no systemic or deliberate mishandling of classified information."

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/18/u...on-emails.html

That being said, she is still being investigated for being ambitious while being a woman.

Meanwhile old feeble man Trump is still whining endlessly like a little baby boy why it isn't okay to hold the next G7 at one of his golf courses!

**Vlad the lad** · 10-22-2019, 06:58 AM

Originally Posted by Cornelious

"State Dept. Inquiry Into Clinton Emails Finds No Deliberate Mishandling of Classified Information

WASHINGTON — A yearslong State Department investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server found that while the use of the system for official business increased the risk of compromising classified information, there was no systemic or deliberate mishandling of classified information."

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/18/u...on-emails.html

That being said, she is still being investigated for being ambitious while being a woman.

Meanwhile old feeble man Trump is still whining endlessly like a little baby boy why it isn't okay to hold the next G7 at one of his golf courses!

New York Times. That’s made me laugh

**blueridgemtnman** · 10-22-2019, 07:31 AM

Originally Posted by Cornelious

"State Dept. Inquiry Into Clinton Emails Finds No Deliberate Mishandling of Classified Information

WASHINGTON — A yearslong State Department investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server found that while the use of the system for official business increased the risk of compromising classified information, there was no systemic or deliberate mishandling of classified information."

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/18/u...on-emails.html

That being said, she is still being investigated for being ambitious while being a woman.

Meanwhile old feeble man Trump is still whining endlessly like a little baby boy why it isn't okay to hold the next G7 at one of his golf courses!

So, what's new? Playing the gender card and/or the race card.....wow. Not to mention, them finding all those emails on Weiner's computer, the law does not state there has to even be intent, she having 30,000 plus emails "bleached"....I could go on and on forever, but you go ahead and stay in your little rabbit hole of a world and enjoy yourself. Gotta love this shit.

**Vlad the lad** · 10-22-2019, 08:29 AM

Originally Posted by blueridgemtnman

So, what's new? Playing the gender card and/or the race card.....wow. Not to mention, them finding all those emails on Weiner's computer, the law does not state there has to even be intent, she having 30,000 plus emails "bleached"....I could go on and on forever, but you go ahead and stay in your little rabbit hole of a world and enjoy yourself. Gotta love this shit.

Keep in mind, the article was an op ed from the times. Basically a proven wing of the dnc

What the op ed fails to mention is the following

The investigation was hindered by delays and missing documents.
The 30,000 deleted emails were not recovered
Clinton was not cleared of wrong doing, the op ed states that they were not able to find any evidence that Clintons secret server wasn’t hacked
The report also states that those who received communication from Clintons secret server, did not intend to leak the intel (maybe because they were not aware that Clinton was sending unfit from a secret server)

This report does not clear Clinton or wrong doing. It doesn’t not say she is innocent. It is just a report of the results of her using a secret server. It was not an investigation to determine how bad her actions were.

But since the op is getting his info from a dnc op-ed, none of us should be surprised that he doesn’t know the full story.

The media counts on people like the op. Those that won’t take the extra step to learn the rest of the story. Where is Paul Harvey when you need him

**blah3** · 10-22-2019, 08:43 AM

Originally Posted by Cornelious

"State Dept. Inquiry Into Clinton Emails Finds No Deliberate Mishandling of Classified Information

WASHINGTON — A yearslong State Department investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server found that while the use of the system for official business increased the risk of compromising classified information, there was no systemic or deliberate mishandling of classified information."

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/18/u...on-emails.html

That being said, she is still being investigated for being ambitious while being a woman.

Meanwhile old feeble man Trump is still whining endlessly like a little baby boy why it isn't okay to hold the next G7 at one of his golf courses!

You delete 30,000 emails before law enforcement can review them and bleach bit your devices and see How prosecutors feel about wrongdoing

**DitkasSausage** · 10-22-2019, 08:58 AM

Did you even read the sentence you posted? "While illegally operating a server, she was found of no wrong-doing by the exact same department that would incur the blame" is a perfectly synonymous way of rephrasing what you wrote...

**Cornelious** · 10-22-2019, 11:05 AM

"The embarrassing epilogue to the media’s obsession with Hillary Clinton’s emails"

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...ate-department

It's not easy for many Americans to understand media. The belief that Hillary's emails were a big deal demonstrates this perfectly. In other words, if you STILL think her emails were anything other than a minor mishap, you are easily susceptible to being manipulated by the media.

**blah3** · 10-22-2019, 11:53 AM

Originally Posted by Cornelious

"The embarrassing epilogue to the media’s obsession with Hillary Clinton’s emails"

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...ate-department

It's not easy for many Americans to understand media. The belief that Hillary's emails were a big deal demonstrates this perfectly. In other words, if you STILL think her emails were anything other than a minor mishap, you are easily susceptible to being manipulated by the media.

Wait you think it’s the media fault people think the private server was a big a big deal????
Bwhahahahah. Most of the media is spinning that it’s not a big deal.

**wickedsolo** · 10-22-2019, 12:05 PM

Originally Posted by Cornelious

"The embarrassing epilogue to the media’s obsession with Hillary Clinton’s emails"

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...ate-department

It's not easy for many Americans to understand media. The belief that Hillary's emails were a big deal demonstrates this perfectly. In other words, if you STILL think her emails were anything other than a minor mishap, you are easily susceptible to being manipulated by the media.

Someone including a link to a Vox article suggesting others are being manipulated by the media. That's funny.

**CarrollCoRaven** · 10-22-2019, 06:18 PM

Anyone who has had a top secret clearance(I did) knows damn well she was guilty as hell. Corrupt Comey came up with the BS that she showed no "intent" when handling her classified emails when that's a flat out lie. I was briefed yearly that it did not matter if you made a "mistake" while handling classified material. If you screw up, you can be charged, your clearance pulled and you will face criminal charges. Lock her up.

**steelerhater** · 10-22-2019, 09:18 PM

Originally Posted by Cornelious

"State Dept. Inquiry Into Clinton Emails Finds No Deliberate Mishandling of Classified Information

WASHINGTON — A yearslong State Department investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server found that while the use of the system for official business increased the risk of compromising classified information, there was no systemic or deliberate mishandling of classified information."

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/18/u...on-emails.html

That being said, she is still being investigated for being ambitious while being a woman.

Meanwhile old feeble man Trump is still whining endlessly like a little baby boy why it isn't okay to hold the next G7 at one of his golf courses!

Anyone with half a brain knows that the fix was in with that investigation. Wasn’t Peter Strozk handing that investigation? You have to be really dumb to think that whole thing was on the up and up.

**ravenmaniac4life** · 10-22-2019, 09:38 PM

Originally Posted by steelerhater

Anyone with half a brain knows that the fix was in with that investigation. Wasn’t Peter Strozk handing that investigation? You have to be really dumb to think that whole thing was on the up and up.

Not on the up and up? Lol.

Strzok admitted that he intentionally withheld FBI reports related to the Clinton investigation from Congress.

His interviews with Clinton associates Cheryl Mills and Uma Abedin resulted in proven false statements yet neither was charged w/lying to the FBI. Mike Flynn was spied on and charged with lying to the FBI even though the FBI initially said he didn’t lie. Strzok conducted all 3 interviews.

In the infamous Strzok/Paige text exchanges...Strzok talks about taking it easy on Hilary when he questioned her because...according to him...she was going to be President.

Even James Comey admitted that his rationale for re-opening her email investigation in Oct 2016 was to help Clinton. He said that he wanted to clear her name before she became President. He actually admitted this. If memory serves, I think he even tried to turn it into a dig against Trump by saying something like...”if Trump was doing better in the polls, I wouldn’t have tried to clear her name.” What a despicable piece of shit, right? Btw, this is never mentioned anywhere ever. It’s amazingly unbelievable that an FBI Director actually admitted this.

The fact that Clinton aides destroyed evidence after it was subpoenaed...and NOBODY was charged w/ANYTHING...is all you need to know about “special treatment.”

Yeah...definitely not on the up and up. Understatement of the century.