Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian Puppet...

**BustOfPallas** · 10-18-2019, 09:52 PM

According to Hillary.

WTF?!?

Can Boss or someone, anyone explain to me how this take is not completely batshit crazy?

**steelerhater** · 10-18-2019, 09:57 PM

Originally Posted by BustOfPallas

According to Hillary.

WTF?!?

Can Boss or someone, anyone explain to me how this take is not completely batshit crazy?

Hillary is running for President and she wants to smear all those running against her. It’s how she rolls.

**Laxdad24** · 10-18-2019, 10:31 PM

Tulsi doesn’t fit the party agenda. Hence they have to burn her at the stake before she steals votes from “real” party members.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**BustOfPallas** · 10-18-2019, 10:52 PM

Originally Posted by Laxdad24

Tulsi doesn’t fit the party agenda. Hence they have to burn her at the stake before she steals votes from “real” party members.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is Gabbard planning a run as an independent?

**Laxdad24** · 10-18-2019, 11:24 PM

Originally Posted by BustOfPallas

Is Gabbard planning a run as an independent?

Not that I know but she’s waaaayy to moderate to fit the Dems side. She’s one of the only ones who’s not a Globalist or a true Socialist.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**blueridgemtnman** · 10-19-2019, 07:10 AM

Originally Posted by BustOfPallas

Is Gabbard planning a run as an independent?

Book it.

**wickedsolo** · 10-19-2019, 08:13 AM

Gabbard isn't a Libertarian, but I could see an argument why her anti-globalist/anti-war/anti-interventionist ideas would fit in well on the Libertarian ticket.

**bossofataka** · 10-19-2019, 10:19 AM

Originally Posted by BustOfPallas

According to Hillary.

WTF?!?

Can Boss or someone, anyone explain to me how this take is not completely batshit crazy?

Me..? You don´t read my girlish posts anyway...?

But ok, this is an interesting one, so I´ll take the bait. Hillary, for all her flaws, is certainly a skilled politician. She knew this would get massive attention. So why give that to a candidate that draws around 1-2% and is on the verge of going out of the race...? Still not sure on that one, could be either way... Now, Gabbards response is even more interesting. Almost full out Trumpish outlash. She too of course knows that will be seen everywhere. So still trying to fugure out what it all actually means...

Now, for the actual issue of "grooming", that is a blatant exaggeration. But there´s no doubt she gets massive attention in russian state controlled media, I mean just look yourselves, and that a lot of her social media trending hashtags are indeed russian bots. I wan´t to stress however that I don´t think there´s any collusion or whatever here. But of course Putin would be happy with someone that looks ready to withdraw from the world, or atleast have her knick enough votes from a dem to make sure Trump keeps doing his thing for another four years. Russia absolutley loves his foreign policy (or lack there of).

As for Tulsi, I still don´t quite get her. On many social and ecnomic issues she seems as left as Obama, actually Obama also had a similar stance on wars before taking office and faced with the mess of reality in the middle east... chances are it´d be the same for her.
But it is peculiar with a "moderate democrat" that draws praise from the far left, libertarians, some Fox News-guys, Russia, David Duke and Ron Paul.

**BustOfPallas** · 10-19-2019, 10:50 AM

Originally Posted by bossofataka

Me..? You don´t read my girlish posts anyway...?

But ok, this is an interesting one, so I´ll take the bait. Hillary, for all her flaws, is certainly a skilled politician. She knew this would get massive attention. So why give that to a candidate that draws around 1-2% and is on the verge of going out of the race...? Still not sure on that one, could be either way... Now, Gabbards response is even more interesting. Almost full out Trumpish outlash. She too of course knows that will be seen everywhere. So still trying to fugure out what it all actually means...

Now, for the actual issue of "grooming", that is a blatant exaggeration. But there´s no doubt she gets massive attention in russian state controlled media, I mean just look yourselves, and that a lot of her social media trending hashtags are indeed russian bots. I wan´t to stress however that I don´t think there´s any collusion or whatever here. But of course Putin would be happy with someone that looks ready to withdraw from the world, or atleast have her knick enough votes from a dem to make sure Trump keeps doing his thing for another four years. Russia absolutley loves his foreign policy (or lack there of).

As for Tulsi, I still don´t quite get her. On many social and ecnomic issues she seems as left as Obama, actually Obama also had a similar stance on wars before taking office and faced with the mess of reality in the middle east... chances are it´d be the same for her.
But it is peculiar with a "moderate democrat" that draws praise from the far left, libertarians, some Fox News-guys, Russia, David Duke and Ron Paul.

Nice take. When I was kidding you before I was just trying to make light of your long form type responses here. You would probably do really well in a long form Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson type medium.

The other stuff was gratuitous smack. Please take it as such.

**bossofataka** · 10-19-2019, 11:07 AM

Originally Posted by BustOfPallas

Nice take. When I was kidding you before I was just trying to make light of your long form type responses here. You would probably do really well in a long form Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson type medium.

The other stuff was gratuitous smack. Please take it as such.

True, I also notice I have a harder time getting to the point in english than I do in swedish, like beating around the bush to say something a natural english speaker can do much quicker. And I get frustrated when I can´t phrase things the way I want sometimes... But yeah, I also tend to have long posts in swedish sometimes, ehum.. It is also hard to reply and address the often long posts of Ditkas and rav without being it yourself.

Well, I´m guilty of that too so...

**bossofataka** · 10-19-2019, 11:12 AM

If one can be allowed to speculate wildly here, and almost go a little conspiratorial, I could say that it´s an attempt from the democrats to make Tulsi relevant. But I could just as easily make a point that it is to make sure that her endorement from Russia is brought to attention to scare people off... but then by doing so you actually risk making her the independent she previously stated she isn´t willing to be... t´s almost like a soap opera the politics of today.

**bandc** · 10-20-2019, 04:04 PM

This is equivalent to red scare scare tactics. Just from a logical perspective, it makes no sense as to how she could have the access she has in the military and also become second in command in the DNC without being vetted from head to toe for all of her connections.

On the other hand, I also think it's sad that Bernie hasnt gone to bat for her after she sacrificed a cushy spot on the DNC in order to promote his policies. Also, I'm super happy that Yang stood up for her. I think they would make a great ticket.