Hayden Hurst: rock or suck?

**ReedInTheWind** · 09-20-2019, 09:24 PM

Hurst and a 1st for Jalen Ramsey

**sflegend89** · 09-20-2019, 09:28 PM

The title of this thread makes me uncomfortable

**JimZipCode** · 09-20-2019, 09:42 PM

Originally Posted by sflegend89

The title of this thread makes me uncomfortable

Ha. Fair.

**JimZipCode** · 09-20-2019, 09:43 PM

I tried to change it. Didn't "take".

**sflegend89** · 09-21-2019, 01:20 AM

Originally Posted by JimZipCode

I tried to change it. Didn't "take".

Just giving you a hard time lol

**Rygar64** · 09-21-2019, 04:32 AM

Originally Posted by HbgPARavenfan

Andrews makes Hurst expendable

1, Hurst makes Andrews more dangerous
2. What if Andrews gets hurt?

**QtR Nevermore** · 09-21-2019, 07:09 AM

If Hurst got hurt we'd need to find someone else. That 3rd TE wouldn't be as good as Hurst and would cost more money going forward. So he isn't a bust like Perriman and he doesn't look like a special pick like Orlando or Andrews. It seems like he'll help us for the duration of his rookie contract. Some players picked higher will be out the league by then. You know, the busts.

**BcRaven** · 09-21-2019, 01:17 PM

Originally Posted by drdelaware

With Andrews questionable we might see a little more of Hurst this week.

Since the NFL brain-trust officially dropped "probable" from the injury list, just about every player not deemed "out" is declared questionable. I think it makes it more

... Bc

**WrongBaldy** · 09-21-2019, 01:21 PM

cuck?

**HbgPARavenfan** · 09-21-2019, 01:39 PM

Originally Posted by Rygar64

1, Hurst makes Andrews more dangerous
2. What if Andrews gets hurt?

Hurst isn't a bad player, but he is a bad investment.

We can get his production from te's drafted far after his draft position. He doesn't bring.much more than Boyle does.

I'd trade him on his rookie deal if I could to maximize returns

**jonboy79** · 09-21-2019, 01:41 PM

Originally Posted by HbgPARavenfan

Hurst isn't a bad player, but he is a bad investment.

We can get his production from te's drafted far after his draft position. He doesn't bring.much more than Boyle does.

I'd trade him on his rookie deal if I could to maximize returns

I would word this differently. He “was” a bad investment. The dunk costs are what they are, his cap numbers and costs moving forward are fine, as long as you consider the draft pick and signing bonus as a sunk cost.

Boyle, honestly brings a LOT more for THIS offense..

I’m not opposed to trading him, but no reason to force it. If we could get 3rd round value I’m listening. I can see why another team would place that value on him as well.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**Desert Raven** · 09-21-2019, 01:49 PM

Hurst blocks like a mofo. He’s not the pass catcher I thought he’d be, but Andrews is, so as long as someone is the receiver threat it’s not as bad that Hurst hasn’t lived up to first round status. His blocking is springing some nice chunk yard plays. Financially, he’s worth what he’s getting paid on his rookie deal, and he might even be a late bloomer and start getting more involved in the offense. Important Andrews insurance as well.