Dems are going after Brett [bart] again

**boller4president** · 09-17-2019, 09:27 AM

How do you correct something that should have never been written in the first place? As soon as the so called victim claimed to have no knowledge of the incident there was no story.

In fact the real story isn't even being investigated. Why did this person lie and obviously conduct this ridiculous tale? Has he received money from any group? Has he spoken to or does his facebook page show him supporting democrat politicians?

Instead it's oops you caught us then everyone goes back to living like nothing happened. Where is the m'fn accountability? You know the same journalists demand from others and why isn't the accuser being investigated infact why weren't his claims investigated BEFOREHAND you know corroboration it's not just a buzzword it's important. We will never know these answers because now the media just wants this story to go away. What a bunch of biased hacks they are.

**DitkasSausage** · 09-17-2019, 09:28 AM

Originally Posted by boller4president

How do you correct something that should have never been written in the first place? As soon as the so called victim claimed to have no knowledge of the incident there was no story.

In fact the real story isn't even being investigated. Why did this person lie and obviously conduct this ridiculous tale? Has he received money from any group? Has he spoken to or does his facebook page show him supporting democrat politicians?

Instead it's oops you caught us then everyone goes back to living like nothing happened. Where is the m'fn accountability? You know the same journalists demand from others and why isn't the accuser being investigated infact why weren't his claims investigated BEFOREHAND you know corroboration it's not just a buzzword it's important. We will never know these answers because now the media just wants this story to go away. What a bunch of biased hacks they are.

The person who spread the story to the NYT was literally a Clinton lawyer with no ties to the victim other than he knew of her.

**Ortizer** · 09-18-2019, 08:07 AM

Originally Posted by boller4president

How do you correct something that should have never been written in the first place? As soon as the so called victim claimed to have no knowledge of the incident there was no story.

In fact the real story isn't even being investigated. Why did this person lie and obviously conduct this ridiculous tale? Has he received money from any group? Has he spoken to or does his facebook page show him supporting democrat politicians?

Instead it's oops you caught us then everyone goes back to living like nothing happened. Where is the m'fn accountability? You know the same journalists demand from others and why isn't the accuser being investigated infact why weren't his claims investigated BEFOREHAND you know corroboration it's not just a buzzword it's important. We will never know these answers because now the media just wants this story to go away. What a bunch of biased hacks they are.

So the journalists put out a book with all the details. That's how they were caught. Given they were lacking from the article it makes me wonder if maybe the editor was pushing for those details to be left out for a more inflammatory story.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

**ravenmaniac4life** · 09-18-2019, 09:10 AM

Originally Posted by DitkasSausage

That is exactly right. I was telling my friend that the Dems downfall has been Twitter, Facebook, and Google. In 2008, and 2012, Obama did an AMAZING job with Social Media! Seriously, hats off to the guy for using a fairly brand new technology and leveraging it in new ways. Some of the stuff the Obama campaign was doing was state of the art. They weren't just putting out ads... they were running hardcore sentiment analysis across millions of profiles, and using it to dictate his narrative and his word choices when he spoke. Even if what he was saying was bad policy, he was using words and phrases that were viewed as favorable during his speeches. He mined that data like nobody had ever seen before or even knew existed outside of the movies.

Now flash forward 7 years: Facebook, Twitter, and Google, in an effort to stem conservative rising sentiment, started deplatforming conservative voices as hate speech. Well guess what? When you are using one of these services for conservative news, and all of the people you follow are booted... you stop using the platform. I know more and more people that don't use them anymore... any of them. How do you think that affects the data? I'd imagine the DNC is using at least MOST of the techniques that worked for Obama since it was a successful strategy. The data is HEAVILY flawed and pushed hard left due to the deplatforming. Social Media and big tech made a HORRENDOUS error. They got rid of the MOST valuable political aspect of their companies... the data. Now, the candidates are getting up there saying things that seem absolutely bat-shit crazy. They don't resonate with anyone outside of Brooklyn and Portland hipster-ANTIFA members. A HUGE majority of Americans support ICE and stemming illegal aliens. Listen to the debates though... they are acting like everyone is obviously against this. They think Americans support Medicare for All! Once it is briefly explained, a LARGE amount of Americans are against it. They say, in the same breath, that cops need to be retrained because they are obviously racists, but that these are the same people that they expect to go door to door collecting guns. They say things like they will do a mandatory buy-back of guns... what the hell does that even mean??? I don't know ONE independent or even traditional liberal that will vote for anyone on that stage at this point. People might not like Trump, but they sure as HELL don't like these morons.

This logic makes a ton of sense.