Lamar Jackson first player in nfl history to throw for at least 250 yards and run for at least 120 yards in a game

[Mmcclend]

I’m not debating Lamar’s part in the run game. I’m questioning why we are paying a guy like Ingram. Lamar IS the run game as was proven last year. So why ( IMHO) waste money on a “name” rb who isn’t gonna produce any better than a rookie when Lamar is the straw that stirs the drink?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If we don’t have a back that can hurt other teams then they’ll just key in on Lamar. Ingram had over 100 yards week one. It’s a pick your poison type of thing. Can’t be that with a dogshit RB.

[Laxdad24]

If we don’t have a back that can hurt other teams then they’ll just key in on Lamar. Ingram had over 100 yards week one. It’s a pick your poison type of thing. Can’t be that with a dogshit RB.

So now Gus and Hill are dogshit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jonboy79]

If we don’t have a back that can hurt other teams then they’ll just key in on Lamar. Ingram had over 100 yards week one. It’s a pick your poison type of thing. Can’t be that with a dogshit RB.

It appeared that Arizona sold out to stop Ingram this week. I don’t think they do that for Edwards/Hill.

I also, seriously, can’t undersell the Sony Michel Effect... dude is a bruiser, but kinda sucks because if he is on the field everyone knows he is getting s handoff because he is entirely worthless doing anything else at all... Edwards is the same player...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jonboy79]

So now Gus and Hill are dogshit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not Dogshit, but nowhere near Ingram’s level of complete player today...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Laxdad24]

Not Dogshit, but nowhere near Ingram’s level of complete player today...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’ll concede. But I may be bias because I think with touched Hill can be a great all around back. Keep Gus as a hammer, FB type and give Hill the primary. But that’s my opinion. That puts the most explosive players on the field at all times.

Brown, Boykin, Andrews, Hill , Lamar. That folks is a potential Murders Row of talent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jonboy79]

I’ll concede. But I may be bias because I think with touched Hill can be a great all around back. Keep Gus as a hammer, FB type and give Hill the primary. But that’s my opinion. That puts the most explosive players on the field at all times.

Brown, Boykin, Andrews, Hill , Lamar. That folks is a potential Murders Row of talent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hill REALLY needs to pass block better to make that work. I also think this offense, in particular benefits from a complete player more than a dichotomous pair.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mmcclend]

So now Gus and Hill are dogshit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not dogshit, just unproven. I think Hill can be dynamic. Gus is more of a backup bruiser type of back.

[edromeo]

I’m not debating Lamar’s part in the run game. I’m questioning why we are paying a guy like Ingram. Lamar IS the run game as was proven last year. So why ( IMHO) waste money on a “name” rb who isn’t gonna produce any better than a rookie when Lamar is the straw that stirs the drink?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(1) Ingram is better then a rookie RB he’s literally one of the best 100 players in the league
(2) You want the best RB you can get to minimize the ineptitude of the interior OL and to maximize the running lanes that are opened up

[BearArms]

I’ve been as skeptical as anyone about Lamar and while I’m not fitting him for a gold jacket there is no denying his passing is improving.

I'm in the mood for some crabs as summer hits next year. You didn't forget yet did you?

[WrongBaldy]

https://twitter.com/BrettKollmann/st...648392192?s=20

[Mmcclend]

I'm in the mood for some crabs as summer hits next year. You didn't forget yet did you?

Of course he forgot. You didn’t expect him to live up to his end of the bet did you?