Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 86
  1. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Calvert County
    Posts
    17,306
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    He will be in the season after he retires, no question.
    back on twitter

    "Well that was an appropriate last ride for Pees. A Bengals WR streaking in for a game winning touchdown in the closing minutes is the man’s preferred medium to express his art." - GreenWave52





  2. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wayne Manor, Gotham
    Posts
    48,540
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    Flacco has to be ROH





  3. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    14,042

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    Yes.

    Ravens don't get the second SB without him. Plus his first 5 years were incredible (by the standards of QB play in the franchise prior).
    Master of 'Gifs for dummies'

    "The world called for wetwork, and we answered. No greater good. No just cause." - Kazuhira Miller





  4. #16

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    100% yes





  5. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Eastern Shore
    Posts
    3,930

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    +1

    unbelievable five-year run starting as a rookie.

    unbelievable 2012 playoff run

    great character too. we were proud of our qb (unlike some other teams...)
    "Nothing stops these Baltimore Ravens. Beat them, injure them, shove them to the bottom of the standings, drag them into a hostile environment and mount a big lead, and they just keep trudging forward like nothing fazes them." (Bleacher Report)





  6. #18

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    Duh.





  7. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Land of Verdite
    Posts
    52,639
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    7 years without a playoff victory until he showed up. Zero one-and-dones in the playoffs. First playoff victory against Manning, he led. First playoff victory against the Steelers, he led. He damn sure didn’t lead the first playoff victory against the Patriots, but he eventually became the main reason why we always gave them problems in the playoffs. The only bad word said about him is that he doesn’t play with the same passion that Ray Lewis shows. Zero off the field issues. Never threw a teammate under the bus. Helped Lamar as best he could, in a most professional manner, knowing Lamar was taking his job. Still, the only QB not named Brady, Manning or Roethlisberger, to represent the AFC in the Super Bowl in what, fifteen years? Damn near twenty?





  8. #20

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    Absolutely.
    Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.





  9. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    30,965

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    Fuck no!

    Jk.

    Fuck yes!!
    "Cause if you ain’t pissed off for greatness, that just means you’re okay with being mediocre, and ain’t no man in here okay with just basic.”
    - Ray Lewis

    https://www.baltimoreravens.com/author/cole-jackson

    Twitter: @ColeJacksonFB





  10. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rockville, MD
    Posts
    1,252

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    Was done w the Flacco era a couple years ago but he absolutely should be in ROH.





  11. #23

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    Nope. Dilfer isn't there no reason Flacco should.





  12. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    64,929
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Joe - ROH or Nah?

    It never ends well but for the SB run alone yes

    World Domination 3 Points at a Time!





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Link To Mobile Site
var infolinks_pid = 3297965; var infolinks_wsid = 0; //—->