Mueller Testimony

[NCRAVEN]

At no point in the history of the country, is it the responsibility of the accused to have the prosecution exonerate them of a crime. Our entire foundation of our justice system is based on the opposite of the Nadler quote you picked out. Mueller even had to admit that 5 minutes later. So this quote by Nadler is the most intellectually dishonest statement by any and all democrats, and it takes a complete lack of any civic knowledge to agree with it. If you don’t know this basic principle of our justice system, you should remove yourself from any and all political commentary forever.

That's the saddest part of the whole thing. Not that Baldy doesn't understand that, but that our elected officials are pretending that is the standard.

[ravenmaniac4life]

That's the saddest part of the whole thing. Not that Baldy doesn't understand that, but that our elected officials are pretending that is the standard.

...and that people believe it

[DitkasSausage]

Here’s the truth: if there was ANY positives from this hearing re: Trump being bad, the media would be blasting it. They are trying VERY hard to forget it. Only the dumbest of media talking heads are still going (ie., Joy Behar, Don Lemon, Maddow).
The Democrats were told countless times NOT to put Mueller on the stand by: Mueller, his team, the Republicans, a lot of the media, specifically Weismann, Trump... etc... yet Nadler, the biggest dipshit EVER to lead this committee, plowed forward with his merry band of the most incompetent congressmen and women. Spearheaded by Adam Schiff, who used his time to ask zero questions but to make up a story. Had he put one question to Mueller regarding that story, Mueller would have said, “Uh...umm... no... that’s not what we found at all....”.
This was the very best the DNC had, and it looked like a bunch of pugs f’ing a football on network television. Russia conspiracies are dead. Obstruction is dead. The entire BS is dead. The people hanging on the OLC thing? Guess what? It’s not a code or a rule, but a conduct measure. Had Mueller had enough to indict the president, all he had to do was ask Barr.... that’s literally it. That’s what he initially claimed stopped him from indictment? In other words, he didn’t have crap. So NOW, are we allowed to throw Mueller in Rikers for lying to Congress? He admitted he misspoke several times and that’s all it took to toss Flynn in jail. By Muellers OWN standards, his house should be raided by the FBI, and he should be hauled to jail. If we’re to follow his rules which had NOTHING to do with justice. Everyone should be kinda scared but definitely PISSED OFF that long serving members of our government did ANY of this crap. In my opinion, Mueller and his entire team should be indicted for fraudulent use of taxpayer money.

[wickedsolo]

Here’s the truth: if there was ANY positives from this hearing re: Trump being bad, the media would be blasting it. They are trying VERY hard to forget it. Only the dumbest of media talking heads are still going (ie., Joy Behar, Don Lemon, Maddow).
The Democrats were told countless times NOT to put Mueller on the stand by: Mueller, his team, the Republicans, a lot of the media, specifically Weismann, Trump... etc... yet Nadler, the biggest dipshit EVER to lead this committee, plowed forward with his merry band of the most incompetent congressmen and women. Spearheaded by Adam Schiff, who used his time to ask zero questions but to make up a story. Had he put one question to Mueller regarding that story, Mueller would have said, “Uh...umm... no... that’s not what we found at all....”.
This was the very best the DNC had, and it looked like a bunch of pugs f’ing a football on network television. Russia conspiracies are dead. Obstruction is dead. The entire BS is dead. The people hanging on the OLC thing? Guess what? It’s not a code or a rule, but a conduct measure. Had Mueller had enough to indict the president, all he had to do was ask Barr.... that’s literally it. That’s what he initially claimed stopped him from indictment? In other words, he didn’t have crap. So NOW, are we allowed to throw Mueller in Rikers for lying to Congress? He admitted he misspoke several times and that’s all it took to toss Flynn in jail. By Muellers OWN standards, his house should be raided by the FBI, and he should be hauled to jail. If we’re to follow his rules which had NOTHING to do with justice. Everyone should be kinda scared but definitely PISSED OFF that long serving members of our government did ANY of this crap. In my opinion, Mueller and his entire team should be indicted for fraudulent use of taxpayer money.

An interesting thing I heard Shapiro bring up today was that it seems like Mueller really had no part in any of the investigation other than possibly serving as a figurehead.

[ravenmaniac4life]

An interesting thing I heard Shapiro bring up today was that it seems like Mueller really had no part in any of the investigation other than possibly serving as a figurehead.

Which...if true...means the DNC donors and Hilary supporters that Mueller hired were driving everything.

So...people who were motivated to find ANYTHING they could to ruin Trump found absolutely nothing.

Put any tenured politician in DC under the same scrutiny and they’d resign tomorrow.

I can hear the sheep now. “But, but, but...he’s just gotta be a criminal. He just has to be! The SDNY will get him! Say what? They dropped their case too? Dammit!”

[Ortizer]

At no point in the history of the country, is it the responsibility of the accused to have the prosecution exonerate them of a crime. Our entire foundation of our justice system is based on the opposite of the Nadler quote you picked out. Mueller even had to admit that 5 minutes later. So this quote by Nadler is the most intellectually dishonest statement by any and all democrats, and it takes a complete lack of any civic knowledge to agree with it. If you don’t know this basic principle of our justice system, you should remove yourself from any and all political commentary forever.

To be fair, I think that choice of words had more to do with Trump running his mouth about being fully exonerated by the report, than a guilty until proven innocent standard.

That said, the democrats do look like a pissed off cop searching your car on the side of the road because you must be guilty of something.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

[KevBA]

An interesting thing I heard Shapiro bring up today was that it seems like Mueller really had no part in any of the investigation other than possibly serving as a figurehead.

In hindsight, this is OBVIOUS. They picked him for his (now badly damaged) credibility. Why else did the DNC and mainstream media (really only need to say DNC or mainstream media since they are one and the same now)- go OVERBOARD with their praise of Mueller from the start. They went on and on and on about how credible, honest, straight and narrow...yada yada yada... Then early and often- how DARE you even question the sainted Bob Mueller..... They KNEW the game. He was just the figurehead in name only to allow the partisan hacks to run wild for 2 years fishing.

There WAS election interference- they (team of angry democrats working for Mueller) likely did enough damage to give the dems the house in the mid term. They knew BEFORE the election there was no "there" there...... There was also election interference in 2016- by DNC/HRC (bought and paid for dossier) and FBI/DOJ (spying). But NONE by Trump campaign. NO Russia collusion. NONE. This is 100x worse than Watergate. Hopefully the accountability (Comey, Brennen, Clapper, Lynch, OBAMA- YES. He had to know... Stzrok and others) starts NOW.

[KevBA]

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/alan...-trump-actions

This concept of "not exonerating Trump" is yet another example of where MSM/Progressives HATE Trump and want to DESTROY him so badly they will throw ANY principle out the window or bend/break any rule/law etc......

Lets investigate the investigators......when we get to Obama, if there is not a "smoking gun" (we all know he was in on the spying campaign of Trump)- lets SHOUT from the mountaintops for eternity- but he was NOT EXONERATED.... Left will go absolutely NUTS when their hero gets the same taint. And we can say WHATABOUTISM WHATABOUTISM.....

[CarrollCoRaven]

In hindsight, this is OBVIOUS. They picked him for his (now badly damaged) credibility. Why else did the DNC and mainstream media (really only need to say DNC or mainstream media since they are one and the same now)- go OVERBOARD with their praise of Mueller from the start. They went on and on and on about how credible, honest, straight and narrow...yada yada yada... Then early and often- how DARE you even question the sainted Bob Mueller..... They KNEW the game. He was just the figurehead in name only to allow the partisan hacks to run wild for 2 years fishing.

There WAS election interference- they (team of angry democrats working for Mueller) likely did enough damage to give the dems the house in the mid term. They knew BEFORE the election there was no "there" there...... There was also election interference in 2016- by DNC/HRC (bought and paid for dossier) and FBI/DOJ (spying). But NONE by Trump campaign. NO Russia collusion. NONE. This is 100x worse than Watergate. Hopefully the accountability (Comey, Brennen, Clapper, Lynch, OBAMA- YES. He had to know... Stzrok and others) starts NOW.

At one time, Comey was thought to have impeccable credibility just like Mueller.

[ravenmaniac4life]

Earlier today, Nadler cited Mueller's exchange with Ted Lieu regarding OLC opinion...which Mueller later corrected...but Nadler didn’t mention the corrected statement. Lol.

Nadler thinks Democrat voters are idiots.

[NCRAVEN]

Earlier today, Nadler cited Mueller's exchange with Ted Lieu regarding OLC opinion...which Mueller later corrected...but Nadler didn’t mention the corrected statement. Lol.

Nadler thinks Democrat voters are idiots.

You think they're not?

[ravenmaniac4life]

You think they're not?

Being dumb and simply not knowing aren’t always the same thing.