Results 109 to 120 of 132
-
05-20-2019, 05:38 PM #109Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,662
Re: Baltimore Signing Michael Floyd (WR)
-
05-20-2019, 05:39 PM #110Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,662
-
05-20-2019, 09:41 PM #111Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 941
Re: Baltimore Signing Michael Floyd (WR)
I understand the special teams argument for him, but as a receiver I just don't see it. He has had 3 seasons to produce, and he hasn't AT ALL. The WR core ahead of him has always been terrible. So, he should have been able to find his way on the field, and make plays. I think he's proven he's just a fringe guy, and I can't consider him a "lock" to make the team for that reason. That said, I will agree that out of the weak field of guys that are battling it out for the last 3 spots, he should probably be one of the favorites given his ST ability.
-
05-21-2019, 07:28 AM #112
Re: Baltimore Signing Michael Floyd (WR)
I think that's just it. He's a fine #4 WR, and he can make a catch if asked to, but his special teams is really what's keeping him there. He really is very impressive on ST. I think there's an argument to be made that Moore hasn't broken out because he hasn't been given the opportunity, and whenever he was given the opportunity he succeeded, but I'm not entirely sure I buy that argument.
"That's not Donovan McNabb."
-
05-21-2019, 07:44 AM #113
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Wayne Manor, Gotham
- Posts
- 48,813
- Blog Entries
- 8
-
Re: Baltimore Signing Michael Floyd (WR)
When Chris Moore was drafted The Ravens had Steve Smith Sr, Mike Wallace and Kamar Aikens a front of him. That was also the same year The Ravens drafted Breshad Perriman in the first round. it wasn't really until 2017 that The Ravens wide receiver group was terrible which is due to injuries and Perriman not stepping up from his productive 2016 season. Moore did get his chance to shine that year and he did make some plays here and there. He was also inconsistent as well with drop passes but honestly to say The Ravens wide receiver group has always been terrible since Chris Moore has been drafted is a bit extreme.
I thought Moore looked better last year even through he wasn't targeted often. The Ravens coaching staff seem to always use him at some point on their offense in these past three years so they must think he has potential to be a good receiver or like what they have seen out of him. I think it's just a wait and see situation when it comes to Moore and he has a great situation to prove himself because this time The Ravens starting position is wide open.
-
05-21-2019, 11:40 AM #115Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 941
Re: Baltimore Signing Michael Floyd (WR)
That is a fair point about his rookie year. Old Steve Smith, Old Mike Wallace, and Kamar Aiken isn't a terrible top 3. That's probably two solid #2's, and a decent #3. So, overall a pretty mediocre bunch, but not terrible. Plus, that was his rookie year, and he did also have a 1st round pick to compete with for snaps. So, we can give him a mulligan for that year.
The last 2 years we have probably had the worst WR core in the league though. Despite that fact, he hasn't found his way on to the field much at all, and he hasn't produced. So, personally I've seen enough. He is what he is. A fringe NFL WR that can add value on special teams, but you probably don't want taking significant snaps at WR.
We can agree to disagree, and I honestly hope he manages to prove me wrong by breaking out this season. However, I hope that if, as I suspect, that doesn't happen, then we find more valuable players to beat him out and fill out the roster with.
-
05-21-2019, 11:43 AM #116Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 941
Re: Baltimore Signing Michael Floyd (WR)
Agreed that Moore should have the edge due to ST, but I just think it's close enough to be a competition. The more players we can bring in to compete for those last 3 spots, the better. So, I'm happy with this signing. I mean, where is the downside to more cheap competition?
-
05-21-2019, 11:45 AM #117
Re: Baltimore Signing Michael Floyd (WR)
All Floyd does is get added to my WR5 competition:
Brown
Boykin
Snead
Moore
Scott/Lasley/Wesley/Floyd/Roberts
There'll be a 6th of one of the group of 5 also shows strong ST abilities."Cause if you ain’t pissed off for greatness, that just means you’re okay with being mediocre, and ain’t no man in here okay with just basic.”
- Ray Lewis
https://www.baltimoreravens.com/author/cole-jackson
Twitter: @ColeJacksonFB
-
05-21-2019, 11:47 AM #118Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 941
Re: Baltimore Signing Michael Floyd (WR)
-
05-21-2019, 11:53 AM #119
Re: Baltimore Signing Michael Floyd (WR)
I do think it makes him a lock. Historically we've kept 6 WR's when the 6th guy shows strong STs to go along with another STer (but that other STer could have been a TE too - Think Darren Waller's ST's).
So, hypothetically say Wesley and Lasley shows a lot AND Lasley is showing some abilities as a gunner on KO's. You could see Moore slide down to the 6 spot on the depth chart.
I personally don't see a scenario where Moore doesn't make the team because of his ST abilities."Cause if you ain’t pissed off for greatness, that just means you’re okay with being mediocre, and ain’t no man in here okay with just basic.”
- Ray Lewis
https://www.baltimoreravens.com/author/cole-jackson
Twitter: @ColeJacksonFB
-
05-21-2019, 12:05 PM #120Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 941
Bookmarks