Results 121 to 132 of 138
Thread: A response to "infanticide".
-
04-19-2019, 10:27 PM #121
-
04-19-2019, 11:00 PM #122Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Posts
- 1,004
-
Re: A response to "infanticide".
The majority of high risk pregnancies are manageable and easily defined. We don’t need the laws we have to say that just uses the term “health” which can include mental, emotional, financial or social.
Plus I’m not really talking about pregnancy where the mothers life is in danger. You said “where there isn’t a good enough reason to get one”. Are you agreeing with me that aside from the mothers life being in danger there isn’t a good reason?
-
04-22-2019, 08:31 AM #124Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 9,162
Re: A response to "infanticide".
-
04-22-2019, 09:37 AM #125
Re: A response to "infanticide".
Was never a thought. Again. ....if you guys would actually READ other people’s posts you’d see that I’m NOT PRO ABORTION. I’d never want to have one. That said I also don’t want the Gov telling me what to do with every thing. Abortion is a legal problem or issue. It’s a moral or medical issue. Doesn’t need Gov involvement.
For the record ...my daughter had two choices when my grandson was born ...a C-Section ( which she chose ) or an abortion. At that moment it was her life or his. She chose the path of least resistance and best hope for both of them. Again ...she chose. Not the GoV. And this wasn’t some shady ass PP clinic ...this was at Johns Hopkins.
“You gonna do something .....or just stand there and bleed” Wyatt Earp
-
Re: A response to "infanticide".
Lax, I know you're not pro-abortion. There are tons of things the government tells us we can't do with our bodies. Drugs, prostitution etc. I'd trade those for ending abortion as the others are things you're doing with YOUR body, abortion is doing something to someone elses body.
I for the life of me just can't comprehended how people see life in the womb as anything different than life outside the womb. Is life less valuable based off where it' geographically located?
-
04-22-2019, 10:48 AM #127
Re: A response to "infanticide".
It’s a character flaw. To me ...until you are here ...you ain’t here. I know I’m complicated. I’m an avid hunter / fisher but I can’t stand the idea of poachers. I’m anti “big game “ hunting. I mean who eats a Lion?
While I don’t believe a baby is real until it’s viable outside the mother , I personally don’t see 1st term abortion as murder. After that ...eh.
For what it’s worth I don’t think prostitution should be illegal either. Lol.
“You gonna do something .....or just stand there and bleed” Wyatt Earp
-
Re: A response to "infanticide".
You'd be against after 8 weeks, when they can feel pain etc. but it's not murder during the first term. You don't see them as real until it's viable outside the mother, but you're against it after the first term, but it's not murder in the first term, but you're against it after 8 weeks
I mean... clearly I'm not making any progress here so I'm not going to try. But I will say.. you have successfully confused the shit out of me!
-
04-22-2019, 11:18 AM #129
-
04-22-2019, 12:12 PM #130Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 9,162
-
04-22-2019, 02:00 PM #131
Re: A response to "infanticide".
Yes. My grandson was born at 33ish weeks. So well into the final trimester. 21 weeks is usually considered “viable “ outside the mother. But even at 32/33 he still lived in an incubator for almost 3 months. But yes it does support NCs stance and I agree 100% that late term abortions shouldn’t be done. A c-section can be preformed in most cases and then it’s up to med care to keep the baby alive.
“You gonna do something .....or just stand there and bleed” Wyatt Earp
-
04-23-2019, 05:08 PM #132Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Location
- Pasadena, MD
- Posts
- 12,234
Bookmarks