Results 109 to 120 of 138
Thread: A response to "infanticide".
-
-
04-19-2019, 08:49 PM #110
-
04-19-2019, 09:37 PM #111Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Posts
- 1,004
Re: A response to "infanticide".
It's healthier if you do it right. The hardest thing I ever had to do was cutting out junk food. Sugar is more addictive than any drug out there. Stopping meat is easy in comparison. If you love animals like me you should be a vegan!
-
-
04-19-2019, 09:41 PM #113Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Posts
- 1,004
Re: A response to "infanticide".
Both. I mean, I don't like to see animals suffer. I don't think anyone does. But I started it for health reasons.
-
-
04-19-2019, 09:52 PM #115Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Posts
- 1,004
-
Re: A response to "infanticide".
You said you don’t like to see animals suffer. And asked what’s the difference between abortion and slaughtering animals. I’m saying apply your logic that it’s wrong to make animals suffer to babies and you have the answer to your question.
I will add, that is not the main point about why abortion is wrong though.
-
04-19-2019, 10:01 PM #117Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Posts
- 1,004
Re: A response to "infanticide".
My question was about why pro life people don't become vegan. How does that answer my question.
-
Re: A response to "infanticide".
-
04-19-2019, 10:17 PM #119Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Posts
- 1,004
Re: A response to "infanticide".
Well, because you just killed something that doesn't want to be killed. Most people would object to being eaten by a bear for example.
I think vegans should be pro life with a few exceptions. Where it gets slippery is when you leave it up to the government to decide what is or isn't a good enough reason to get one.
-
Bookmarks