Results 49 to 60 of 244
-
03-26-2019, 09:02 AM #49Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 9,153
Re: Mueller report released to the Attorney General
-
03-26-2019, 09:09 AM #50Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 2,459
Re: Mueller report released to the Attorney General
Then why was McConnell for letting it be public before he read it? If its not right its not right, I get that.
But it was right to go public in his eyes until he read the report, then it wasn't right after he read the report....
That's a bit shady.
This is coming from someone that never thought this report would matter at all, FYI. I never believed this would be anything useful.
-
Re: Mueller report released to the Attorney General
He didn't say that he wanted the report public. He said he wanted "as much openness and transparency as possible".
Also, I don't think anyone in congress has read it. So I don't believe he wanted it released, read it then changed his mind is an accurate description of what happened.
-
03-26-2019, 09:38 AM #52Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 2,459
-
03-26-2019, 09:49 AM #53Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Location
- Pasadena, MD
- Posts
- 12,233
-
-
Re: Mueller report released to the Attorney General
-
03-26-2019, 10:20 AM #56Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 2,074
Re: Mueller report released to the Attorney General
Left just keeps grasping at straws. Not prepared to say no collusion unless they get to read the entire report. And of course, it will have to be heavily redacted, so how can they really say for sure since it's not the entire report? And now the shift of focus to obstruction of justice. How can you obstruct justice in a case where no crime was committed?
I think Adam Schiff should be charged with obstruction of justice. He has stated several times publicly that he has clear evidence of collusion. Never mind that Mueller with 2 years, a team of biased investigative attorneys, and hundreds of subpoenas couldn't find evidence of collusion. Schiff has clear evidence. So why hasn't he provided that evidence to the investigators? Isn't withholding evidence obstruction of justice?
-
03-26-2019, 10:23 AM #57Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 2,459
Re: Mueller report released to the Attorney General
Wouldn't this being released exonerate everyone except those that have already been indicted?
Maybe I'm being naïve or missing something (if so, please get me up to speed), but everyone that could get in trouble from this report has already been taken care of, why not let it be public then. We already know about the people who got caught up in some shit.
Everyone else would be shown to have no involvement in any of this horseshit.
-
03-26-2019, 10:47 AM #58
Re: Mueller report released to the Attorney General
id def release a report that would exonerate me 100% LOL
transparency baby
-
Re: Mueller report released to the Attorney General
Well the thing is, there is no horseshit to be involved in. It was ALL made up by a rival political opponent.
So any information released that painted people in a negative light at this point wouldn't be fair as there was no crime to charge them with.
That was the purpose of the investigation, it didn't charge anyone with anything relating to it's purpose, that should be all the evidence we need.
-
Re: Mueller report released to the Attorney General
Mueller purposefully left the obstruction decision inconclusive and up to Barr for the sole purpose of giving the Democrats a way to continue their bullshit, and allow the Dems and MSM to continue the narrative. It was Mueller's job, after spending $25 million and over 2 years to come up with a conclusion himself. In their warped minds, Barr is not using Mueller's findings correctly because he was appointed by Trump, continuing to play to their base of Trump haters.
Bookmarks