Results 13 to 24 of 223
-
03-18-2019, 02:19 PM #13Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Cumberland RI
- Posts
- 4,930
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
the problem to me is roster construction. OK, so yes Earl might be better than Weddle when healthy, enough to justify the overpay. But you have SO MANY NEEDS. And remember - cap space rolls over.
i was hoping maybe we were done nonsensically spending to the cap every year to be 8-8, and we MIGHT actually take our time building this roster with an eye towards getting younger and sustainability. NOPE. Same old Ravens.
At first I was annoyed they retained Harbs. Now I think the bigger mistake might have been EDC. Thats a hot take, but yeah. This team is managing itself the same way it didn't from 2013 to 2018. And I don't think thats a good thing.
-
03-18-2019, 02:22 PM #14Camp Arm
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Posts
- 7,171
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
Yeah, I think this take isn't just "hot" but intellectually disingenuous. If you think this year is "the same old Ravens," then I'm not sure there's any debating with you in good faith. The Tavon Young signing alone is a good sign (and the fact that the team is already thinking forward to resigning Stanley and Humphrey). If you doubt EDC is eyeing this period of Lamar's rookie contract as an opportunity for the organization to turn the page, then I doubt there'll be any convincing you.
-
03-18-2019, 02:22 PM #15Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Cumberland RI
- Posts
- 4,930
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
"Mark my words ... the Ravens will send both Jefferson and Thomas as Pro-Bowlers this year."
No. Jefferson was an overpay back then out of need. Its more likely that Thomas is hurt again and Jeffereson ends up out of positions than it is both guys form this dynamic safety duo. I think you're sipping too much purple kool-aid.
-
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
Huh? They got the best S in the league for less then Honey Badger and Landon Collins
-
03-18-2019, 02:23 PM #17
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
I don’t think we can consider getting Thomas on this contract a “backfire” no matter the context. He is a HOFer and will be the new heartbeat of our defense, hopefully for the next half decade.
I would rather have him than anyone else in this FA class. The fact that his market didn’t materialize is strange but it’s to our benefit. He’s making slightly less than Collins and Mathieu, is a much better player than either, a much better fit for our team, and, while three years older than them, isn’t exactly old.
-
03-18-2019, 02:25 PM #18Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- shrewsbury, pa
- Posts
- 6,190
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
All teams were caught off guard by the safety salaries. Once Collins got overpaid by the Skins all the other teams knew they had to go high.
-
03-18-2019, 02:26 PM #19Rookie Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2019
- Posts
- 9
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
-
03-18-2019, 02:27 PM #20Camp Arm
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Posts
- 7,171
-
03-18-2019, 02:27 PM #21
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
I agree.
To add to this, i would like to say the signing of a 30 year old RB who doesnt complement the current backs is another desperate signing. It should be compared to the michael huff, marcus spears, chris canty signing or the ryan grant signing last year. They are adding a player just for the sake of allocating some free cap space without the appearance that they got schooled in FA. I dont want to compare earl thomas to these signings because he may turn out to be a good signing, but based on his FA interest he was a desperate signing.
And i totally agree with the weddle point. If at worse case you kept him at his current salary, you still had the cap room to do it while drafting a safety. At worse you overpay just 1 year as opposed to earl thomas for several. You could hold onto weddle, try to get earl on a 1 year deal, then cut weddle too. You could test thomas for a year and resign for the same salary if he turns out to be good.
I like your word, arrogance. Thats whats causing mismanagement. Edc is just continuing the trend, and maybe he even started the trend when he got promoted.
-
03-18-2019, 02:28 PM #22
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
This isn’t an overpay. He is making less than worse players at the same position. Don’t get caught up in a single phrase in a Peter King article lol.
This thread might be even more ridiculous than the “trade for Rosen” one because this dude is actually trying to frame himself as rational.
-
03-18-2019, 02:29 PM #23
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
Hall of Famer in his prime, didn't set the market. Mosley was an overpay, it was so much more than quality LBs cost in this league. What we paid Earl Thomas is what quality Safeties are paid these days. It was market price.
"That's not Donovan McNabb."
-
03-18-2019, 02:29 PM #24Camp Arm
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Posts
- 7,171
Re: Contrarian View - Ravens underestimated the Safety Market, and it backfired
My favorite part of this thread is how random schmoes off the street are second-guessing one of the most successful franchises in the NFL and have the gall to label them arrogant.
It's times like this when I wish I had the sarcastic Jennifer Lawrence "Okay" meme bookmarked.
Bookmarks