Results 25 to 36 of 71
-
02-14-2019, 12:37 PM #25Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,651
-
02-14-2019, 01:42 PM #26
Re: Slightly OT: Why did the Ravens abandon the air coryell system?
Where are those numbers from?
Football reference has a different number for 2014: https://www.pro-football-reference.c...F/FlacJo00.htm
Which is what I look at."Cause if you ain’t pissed off for greatness, that just means you’re okay with being mediocre, and ain’t no man in here okay with just basic.”
- Ray Lewis
https://www.baltimoreravens.com/author/cole-jackson
Twitter: @ColeJacksonFB
-
02-14-2019, 01:44 PM #27
Re: Slightly OT: Why did the Ravens abandon the air coryell system?
Agree to disagree I guess. I definitely didn't see a true WCO.
And I absolutely think the rollouts were to get the ball downfield. Joe's strength was his arm power not his accuracy, which is why any switch to a WCO over an AC was silly.
It seemed to me when they interviewed Kubiak he said yeah I can bring in some of the things I do really well, but modify my route combos to fit Joe better. That's how I saw it play out."Cause if you ain’t pissed off for greatness, that just means you’re okay with being mediocre, and ain’t no man in here okay with just basic.”
- Ray Lewis
https://www.baltimoreravens.com/author/cole-jackson
Twitter: @ColeJacksonFB
-
02-14-2019, 02:13 PM #28
-
Re: Slightly OT: Why did the Ravens abandon the air coryell system?
World Domination 3 Points at a Time!
-
02-14-2019, 02:20 PM #30
Re: Slightly OT: Why did the Ravens abandon the air coryell system?
"Cause if you ain’t pissed off for greatness, that just means you’re okay with being mediocre, and ain’t no man in here okay with just basic.”
- Ray Lewis
https://www.baltimoreravens.com/author/cole-jackson
Twitter: @ColeJacksonFB
-
02-14-2019, 02:44 PM #31
Re: Slightly OT: Why did the Ravens abandon the air coryell system?
To clarify what I meant, I was talking about the number of steps the QB take from under center tied into the progression being part of Kubiak's system not about footwork in general. Also Kubiak wanted the ball out quick on short drop steps. Seems familiar to Bill Walsh to me which is what we referred to as WCO.
-
02-14-2019, 03:35 PM #32
Re: Slightly OT: Why did the Ravens abandon the air coryell system?
Why do NFL coaches always try to pound square pegs into round holes and vice versa - so they 'can fit their system'?
Why not assess what the players you actually have and what they can do and then create a system that presents their best skills in a position to succeed. Work to maximize your players strengths and minimize their weaknesses.
The year before Kubiak didn't they try Zone Blocking with the line and it was a categorical failure as it seemed no lineman knew what his job was in the new scheme.
-
Re: Slightly OT: Why did the Ravens abandon the air coryell system?
From what I remember of the situation, Kubiak, came in, initially running what he always had. However, Joe Flacco urged him to take more shots down the field. He and Flacco talked about it and he heard out Flacco's reasoning as to why they should. It was around mid-season that they tried this and Kubiak admitted that it made the offense better. Also, that he'd been pushing the ball downfield more than he ever had. After that, he kind of kept it in.
"Please take with you this final sword, The Excellector. I am praying that your journey will be guided by the light", Leon Shore
-
02-14-2019, 04:48 PM #34Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Posts
- 5,914
Re: Slightly OT: Why did the Ravens abandon the air coryell system?
I recall the AC system not being particularly effective early in Cam's run with the team because we didn't have a talented deep ball receiver. Early on they had Mason and some jags and Mason was not a deep ball guy and Cam tended to not use the middle of the field like he could have. I remember reading in another board 2008-2010 about how frustrating it was that we never played a very good deep ball game to take advantage of Joe's arm. In 2010 we got Boldin who helped but he still wasn't a great fit in the AC system if Cam wasn't going to use him properly (which we finally saw once Caldwell took over). It wasn't untill Torrey came along that Cam's system really started to work better because of that deep threat angle they now had. We had many guus that they wanted to be that deep threat that never worked (Demetrius Williams, Yamon Figurs, Dante Stallworth etc) Cam should have been fired before 2011 but then in 2011 his offense began to work a bit better.
Who remembers Cam's obsession with the End around that NEVER worked? Lol
I think because Caldwell tweaked the AC enough( and thank God he did) that they thought they would have the same success in 2013 but they got rid of Boldin, Pitta got hurt, and they mistakenly thought Torrey and Jacoby could carry the load and thought Tandon Doss was something more than he was. They evaluated poorly including the O line and I dont think it was necesarrily Calwell's fault but I was glad they moved on. That was a miserable offense talent wise.
-
02-14-2019, 05:11 PM #35Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,651
-
02-14-2019, 05:20 PM #36Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,651
Re: Slightly OT: Why did the Ravens abandon the air coryell system?
The post should be pretty self-explanatory? It's Joe's year-by-year stats vs AFC teams only. 12 games a year, against a mostly consistent set of opponents.
Joe's full-season stats for '14 are distorted by the historic awfulness of the AFC South defenses. Makes it hard to filter out the impact of Kubiak vs the impact of playing probably the worst pass-defending division in NFL history. Much more informative to look at Joe's AFC-only stats.
There oughtt be a way to query PFF for games against one conference only? Need Organized Chaos to chime in here.
Bookmarks