Results 13 to 24 of 1122
-
01-14-2019, 06:59 PM #13
-
01-14-2019, 07:02 PM #14Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 4,610
Re: Is Lamar the answer, article from Tony?
With Roman as the OC I think they can challenge for the North. If they got an OC that would try and develop LJ into a passer it would be disaster. We are going to be run heavy and play good defense. They will limit LJ to the Short and intermediate throws over the middle that he can make. Andrews and Hurst will be beasts in the offense. At least they are not trying to square peg into a round hole with LJ. They are going to play to his strengths. They just need to say some Hail Marys that he doesn't get hurt running the ball.
-
01-14-2019, 07:02 PM #15Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,670
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: Is Lamar the answer, article from Tony?
Unbelievable! Mayfield was the #1 over-all pick in the NFL draft, and the Browns have had several of those due to their incompetence on the field, while LJ was the 32nd pick and Ozzie had to trade up to get him. To write "Lamar is consistent with the Ravens ability to evaluate Quarterback talent" is so disingenuous that you're looking like the poster child for MMQB... Bc
-
01-14-2019, 07:16 PM #16
Re: Is Lamar the answer, article from Tony?
Can’t and won’t speak for Mr BC ...but ...I wouldn’t draft a qb this year or next regardless of Lamar ...because of Harbeckler. If the Ravens are gonna keep Harbeckler and his “run first “ offense ...QBs like Lamar are hard to find. We have Lamar and I’d bring back RG3 to back up. Even guys like Cam , Vick and Wilson couldn’t run the ball as much as Harbeckler is gonna have Lamar run it.
In short ...as long as Harbeckler is our HC , The Veer and Lamar are here to stay.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
01-14-2019, 07:33 PM #17Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,682
-
01-14-2019, 07:33 PM #18Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Feb 2018
- Posts
- 143
Re: Is Lamar the answer, article from Tony?
I think even if he never bumps his 58% passing accuracy up to 65%+ it won't be a huge issue because he is proficient at extending drives. 3rd and 6? If the reads aren't there, he converts with his legs.
-
01-14-2019, 07:37 PM #19Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,682
-
01-14-2019, 07:37 PM #20Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
- Posts
- 2,032
Re: Is Lamar the answer, article from Tony?
Baker Mayfield is a quarterback. Lamar is an athlete.
The Ravens are terrible at evaluating quarterbacks. As I indicated earlier - they drafted Boller, Troy Smith, Flacco, Tyrod Taylor - and to complete the list - Chris Redman, Wes Pate, Josh Harris, Derek Andersen, Keith Wenning, John Stark and Wally Richardson. They got lucky with Flacco and got five good years out of him. Over the years they passed (in the draft) on Brees, Big Ben (admittedly they did not have a #1 when Ben was drafted in 2004 - BUT they could have traded up), Rogers, Brady.
The Ravens have no idea what goes into what makes a good quarterback - that is why Lamar is so perfect for them - since they can't tell he's not a good quarterback he fits right in. If a 22 year old Bert Jones tried to be a walk on the Ravens would probably try to work him out as a long snapper.
-
01-14-2019, 07:38 PM #21
-
01-14-2019, 07:43 PM #22
Re: Is Lamar the answer, article from Tony?
Tbh i don't think 58 percent is bad in a vacuum. He just needs enough "big" plays to mask it.
Flaccos career average is probably around that but in say the first half of his career he had enough big plays to make up for it.
When we changed our style of offense to shorter quicker passes and that percentage stayed the same, the offense couldn't get out of its own way.
-
01-14-2019, 07:54 PM #23
Re: Is Lamar the answer, article from Tony?
Alright, I didn't respond the first time but I feel compelled to now.
I watched the Cleveland game. I've watched every game I could. I've watched replays of games. Lamar is a quarterback. Maybe he won't be a good one. But he's a quarterback. And guess what? Baker Mayfield is an athlete. Both, are both.
Lamar isn't some 2-bit college positionless athlete. He makes reads. He looks at more than one option. He rolls out and you see him looking down the field before deciding to throw or run. He is very adept at the play action handoff. You're going to see him able to make audibles in year 2.
Frankly, you're the one that sounds like you haven't been watching.
The Ravens are terrible at evaluating quarterbacks. As I indicated earlier - they drafted Boller, Troy Smith, Flacco, Tyrod Taylor - and to complete the list - Chris Redman, Wes Pate, Josh Harris, Derek Andersen, Keith Wenning, John Stark and Wally Richardson.
They got lucky with Flacco and got five good years out of him.
Over the years they passed (in the draft) on Brees, Big Ben (admittedly they did not have a #1 when Ben was drafted in 2004 - BUT they could have traded up)
Rogers,
Brady.
The Ravens have no idea what goes into what makes a good quarterback - that is why Lamar is so perfect for them - since they can't tell he's not a good quarterback he fits right in. If a 22 year old Bert Jones tried to be a walk on the Ravens would probably try to work him out as a long snapper.
-
01-14-2019, 08:00 PM #24
Re: Is Lamar the answer, article from Tony?
If we are gonna list all the misses at QB for the Ravens let’s go ahead and look at how many QBs are drafted every year and how they end up doing.
Specifically who did the Steelers, Browns, and Bengals trot out there and draft to their roster before they found their franchise guys?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bookmarks