Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 14
  1. #1

    The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    If Flacco and company wouldn't have played so good on Sunday then Baltimore's defense would've absolutely destroyed the sack record.

    If the Titans have 68 offensive plays on Sunday then that extrapolates to 19/18.7 sacks for the Ravens.

    Lets look at some history:

    Whenever the Eagles and Colts had 11 sacks in 1991 and 1992, their opponents had 50 and 53 plays.

    Let's look at the 7 most recent 11 sack games in NFL history:

    Eagles in 1991? Their opponent had 50 offensive plays
    Colts in 1992? 53 offensive plays.
    Cowboys in 1987? 76 offensive plays.
    Bears in 1987? 86 offensive plays.
    Seahawks in 86? 53 offensive plays.
    Raiders in 86? 64 offensive plays and they lost in overtime
    Chargers in 86? 73 offensive plays and they lost

    I didn't have enough time to search through the 12 other times in NFL history that there have been 11 sacks.

    Here are the 4 other times (besides the Giants) that there have been 12 sacks:
    1985: 67 offensive plays
    1984: 65 offensive plays
    1980: the BALTIMORE Colts got 12 sacks in 76 offensive plays
    1966: the STEELERS got sacked 12 times in 66 offensive plays.

    If the Ravens don't grind that clock out at the end of the game and give the ball back to the Titans for one last hurrah for the sack party and if they cram two more sacks into the stat sheet drive then this would have immediately been recognized by many as statistically the most dominant defensive performance in NFL history. What a great game by Baltimore.

    11 sacks in 40 defensive snaps? Ludicrous!





  2. #2

    Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    But does the media give a shit? Nah. They're talking about whether or not the Cowgirls are now superbowl contenders (which is downright hilarious)





  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    18,848

    Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    Quote Originally Posted by Culex View Post
    But does the media give a shit? Nah. They're talking about whether or not the Cowgirls are now superbowl contenders (which is downright hilarious)





  4. #4

    Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    11 sacks, wow!





  5. Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    Quote Originally Posted by Nonsensical Realism View Post
    I didn't have enough time to search through the 12 other times in NFL history that there have been 11 sacks.

    11 sacks in 40 defensive snaps? Ludicrous!
    Here's a PFR query with all games where a team has been sacked 11+ times.

    Here's a table where I've calculated Sack % (sacks / (pass attempts + rush attempts + sacks)). It's not even particularly close.

    Date Tm @ Opp Result OT Pass Att Rushes Sacks Snaps Sack %
    10/14/2018 TEN BAL L 0-21 15 14 11 40 27.5%
    11/7/1965 GNB DET L 7-12 14 24 11 49 22.4%
    9/15/1991 DAL PHI L 0-24 25 14 11 50 22.0%
    9/22/1963 OAK BOS L 14-20 31 10 11 52 21.2%
    11/24/1968 ATL @ STL L 12-17 20 21 11 52 21.2%
    12/8/1986 RAI @ SEA L 0-37 29 13 11 53 20.8%
    9/6/1992 CLE @ IND L 3-14 26 16 11 53 20.8%
    12/17/1961 MIN @ CHI L 35-52 22 24 12 58 20.7%
    11/5/1967 DEN OAK L 17-21 21 25 11 57 19.3%
    12/23/2012 NYJ SDG L 17-27 25 23 11 59 18.6%
    12/16/1984 DET CHI L 13-30 38 15 12 65 18.5%
    10/26/1952 NYG PHI L 10-14 28 34 14 76 18.4%
    10/15/1967 BUF OAK L 20-24 33 16 11 60 18.3%
    11/22/1964 RAM BAL L 7-24 21 28 11 60 18.3%
    10/26/1952 SFO DTX W 48-21 25 24 11 60 18.3%
    9/30/2007 PHI @ NYG L 3-16 31 23 12 66 18.2%
    9/29/1985 HOU DAL L 10-17 26 29 12 67 17.9%
    11/20/1966 PIT DAL L 7-20 29 26 12 67 17.9%
    12/13/1964 DEN BUF L 19-30 31 20 11 62 17.7%
    10/28/1984 MIN @ CHI L 7-16 36 16 11 63 17.5%
    11/20/1960 DET @ CHI L 7-28 26 32 12 70 17.1%
    11/1/1964 STL @ NYG L 17-34 29 25 11 65 16.9%
    9/23/1962 MIN BAL L 7-34 34 20 11 65 16.9%
    12/18/1983 PHI @ STL L 7-31 45 12 11 68 16.2%
    10/26/1980 BAL STL L 10-17 43 21 12 76 15.8%
    11/18/1984 ATL CLE L 7-23 38 22 11 71 15.5%
    11/16/1986 DAL @ SDG W 24-21 33 29 11 73 15.1%
    10/6/1975 DET DAL L 10-36 23 40 11 74 14.9%
    9/30/1984 CLE @ KAN L 6-10 38 26 11 75 14.7%
    10/4/1987 NYJ DAL L 24-38 35 30 11 76 14.5%
    10/4/1987 PHI CHI L 3-35 36 29 11 76 14.5%
    11/16/1986 PHI DET L 11-13 31 37 11 79 13.9%
    11/30/1986 PHI @ RAI W 33-27 OT 39 31 11 81 13.6%
    Last edited by organizedchaos21; 10-16-2018 at 10:27 AM. Reason: added a decimal point to sack %
    Shared Google Folder with Ravens spreadsheets, nextGen charts, and more! Please share my content! (attribution to Twitter requested)

    Knight of the Kingdom of Perfect Play, Student of The Bill James School of Stamping Out Bullshit. Main Sources: PFR, particularly the Play Index; for cap stuff, RSR's Brian McFarland (secondary: OverTheCap, Spotrac)





  6. Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    Now, I have a small issue with this approach. Namely, the Ravens were incorrectly credited with a sack at (Q1, 0:08) when Mariota threw the ball away before stepping out of bounds. So, I removed 1 sack from the Ravens (10 total) and added 1 to pass attempts (16) which means the total number of snaps is the same (40). Then, I took all games with 10+ sacks and checked for highest sack %. The table was incredibly long, so I only kept games with a Sack % > 20%. Feel free to contact me if you want the full table.

    Here's the PFR query for games in which a team is sacked 10+ times.

    Tm Date @ Opp Result OT Sacks Snaps Sack %
    TEN 10/14/2018 BAL L 0-21 10 40 25.0%
    GNB 11/7/1965 DET L 7-12 11 49 22.4%
    DAL 9/15/1991 PHI L 0-24 11 50 22.0%
    ATL 11/24/1968 @ STL L 12-17 11 52 21.2%
    OAK 9/22/1963 BOS L 14-20 11 52 21.2%
    JAX 9/14/2014 @ WAS L 10-41 10 48 20.8%
    RAI 12/8/1986 @ SEA L 0-37 11 53 20.8%
    CLE 9/6/1992 @ IND L 3-14 11 53 20.8%
    MIN 12/17/1961 @ CHI L 35-52 12 58 20.7%
    Last edited by organizedchaos21; 10-16-2018 at 10:45 AM. Reason: combined posts
    Shared Google Folder with Ravens spreadsheets, nextGen charts, and more! Please share my content! (attribution to Twitter requested)

    Knight of the Kingdom of Perfect Play, Student of The Bill James School of Stamping Out Bullshit. Main Sources: PFR, particularly the Play Index; for cap stuff, RSR's Brian McFarland (secondary: OverTheCap, Spotrac)





  7. #7

    Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    Quote Originally Posted by organizedchaos21 View Post
    Now, I have a small issue with this approach. Namely, the Ravens were incorrectly credited with a sack at (Q1, 0:08) when Mariota threw the ball away before stepping out of bounds. So, I removed 1 sack from the Ravens (10 total) and added 1 to pass attempts (16) which means the total number of snaps is the same (40). Then, I took all games with 10+ sacks and checked for highest sack %. The table was incredibly long, so I only kept games with a Sack % > 20%. Feel free to contact me if you want the full table.

    Here's the PFR query for games in which a team is sacked 10+ times.

    Tm Date @ Opp Result OT Sacks Snaps Sack %
    TEN 10/14/2018 BAL L 0-21 10 40 25.0%
    GNB 11/7/1965 DET L 7-12 11 49 22.4%
    DAL 9/15/1991 PHI L 0-24 11 50 22.0%
    ATL 11/24/1968 @ STL L 12-17 11 52 21.2%
    OAK 9/22/1963 BOS L 14-20 11 52 21.2%
    JAX 9/14/2014 @ WAS L 10-41 10 48 20.8%
    RAI 12/8/1986 @ SEA L 0-37 11 53 20.8%
    CLE 9/6/1992 @ IND L 3-14 11 53 20.8%
    MIN 12/17/1961 @ CHI L 35-52 12 58 20.7%
    Yeah, but if you start regarding the calls on the field and making the calls yourself, to be fair, you'd have to go through each one. Its possible that you might be taking sacks off the board for the other QB's.

    However, I do agree that one of the factors that led to so many sacks was Mariotta being a scrambling QB. So really several of the sacks were just runs for losses.





  8. #8

    Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    Patrick Gleason


    @PMGleason
    2h2 hours ago
    More
    Six games in, the #Ravens have yet to allow a TD after halftime.


    Per @EliasSports, the last team to accomplish this feat through a season's first six games was the 1934 Lions.


    Yes, 1934 -- 84 years ago.





  9. #9

    Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    I think the Ravens are a much better team this year than last year. Last years team there was something missing but this years team they are beating up on Good Quarterbacks in Big Ben, Mariota and Keenum. This week is the real test, hopefully they can pass it.





  10. #10

    Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    Quote Originally Posted by organizedchaos21 View Post
    Now, I have a small issue with this approach. Namely, the Ravens were incorrectly credited with a sack at (Q1, 0:08) when Mariota threw the ball away before stepping out of bounds.
    You're going to reverse the call on the field to redo your stats? LOL.
    "This space for rent" - Roger Goodell





  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    37,670
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    Quote Originally Posted by Culex View Post
    But does the media give a shit? Nah. They're talking about whether or not the Cowgirls are now superbowl contenders (which is downright hilarious)
    Shhh, we want to fly :



    Nobody notice what the Ravens are doing, please... Bc





  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    RVA
    Posts
    4,923

    Re: The Ravens had 11 sacks in only 40 defensive snaps which is a historic benchmark

    Quote Originally Posted by organizedchaos21 View Post
    Now, I have a small issue with this approach. Namely, the Ravens were incorrectly credited with a sack at (Q1, 0:08) when Mariota threw the ball away before stepping out of bounds. So, I removed 1 sack from the Ravens (10 total) and added 1 to pass attempts (16) which means the total number of snaps is the same (40). Then, I took all games with 10+ sacks and checked for highest sack %. The table was incredibly long, so I only kept games with a Sack % > 20%. Feel free to contact me if you want the full table.

    Here's the PFR query for games in which a team is sacked 10+ times.

    Tm Date @ Opp Result OT Sacks Snaps Sack %
    TEN 10/14/2018 BAL L 0-21 10 40 25.0%
    GNB 11/7/1965 DET L 7-12 11 49 22.4%
    DAL 9/15/1991 PHI L 0-24 11 50 22.0%
    ATL 11/24/1968 @ STL L 12-17 11 52 21.2%
    OAK 9/22/1963 BOS L 14-20 11 52 21.2%
    JAX 9/14/2014 @ WAS L 10-41 10 48 20.8%
    RAI 12/8/1986 @ SEA L 0-37 11 53 20.8%
    CLE 9/6/1992 @ IND L 3-14 11 53 20.8%
    MIN 12/17/1961 @ CHI L 35-52 12 58 20.7%

    I decided to look back at other performances with similarly high sack / play percentages, with no minimum number of sacks since some games have had even fewer offensive plays than 40 to consider, and the only other one that is anywhere near the top of your existing chart was a 1972 performance by the Baltimore Colts against the Buffalo Bills, in which they sacked James Harris and Dennis Shaw a combined 9 times out of 41 offensive plays, which is just under (but rounds up to) 22.0%. Note: I only went back to 1970 (post-merger stats only) because the stats can get pretty wonky and unreliable the farther back you go (I don't know for sure, but I highly doubt that all those stat lines from the 1940s that PFRef has are accurate, for instance the 1940 Chicago Cardinals are listed as only having 2 offensive plays against the Detroit Lions on September 15? I don't know if that really happened, or the stat line is incomplete, perhaps the game was called early or something? I don't know, but they have lots of games from the 1940s with single-digit number of plays ran, so I just limited my search to post-merger to weed out anomalies).





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Link To Mobile Site
var infolinks_pid = 3297965; var infolinks_wsid = 0; //—->