Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 38
  1. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    near Asheville, NC
    Posts
    24,979

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    Shouldn't be allowed to check out like Maclin did and still get paid.





  2. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pasadena
    Posts
    14,123
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    Quote Originally Posted by WNCRavensFan View Post
    Shouldn't be allowed to check out like Maclin did and still get paid.
    Colby Rasmus just said hold my beer


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro





  3. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    14,042

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    Maclin hurt this offense something fierce.
    Master of 'Gifs for dummies'

    "The world called for wetwork, and we answered. No greater good. No just cause." - Kazuhira Miller





  4. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cumberland RI
    Posts
    4,930

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    I respect what Wallace did, but he ws n9t himself most of 2017. at least in my opinion. in the Steelers game one play he hurt himself off the line, no contact, just came up lame. father time looked like it was coming for him.

    Maclin, he was just disinterested. Doesnt seem like a guy who was resilient mentally, if it took just 8 games for him to quit. by the 2nd half of the season, the offense actually opened up nicely, but by then he couldn't turn. it back on.

    Perriman ducks, nuff said.

    I think our WRs have to do very little to be better than that group last year.

    which is sad, going into the 2017 season it looked like out best trio on paper.





  5. #17

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    Quote Originally Posted by Paintballguy View Post
    The entire Orioles organization just said hold my beer


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    Fixed that for you





  6. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pasadena
    Posts
    14,123
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    Quote Originally Posted by DeltaRaven View Post
    Fixed that for you
    Well played sir


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro





  7. Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    Quote Originally Posted by mmi16 View Post
    Maclin was just punching the time clock.
    and scarfing down the crab cakes.....





  8. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    30,997

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    Loved Wallace. He exceeded my expectations. I never expected him to be a true 1. He was a strong 2. Just another example of the Ravens having a solid 2, but no 1 to make them the most useful.

    Maclin can kick rocks.
    "Cause if you ain’t pissed off for greatness, that just means you’re okay with being mediocre, and ain’t no man in here okay with just basic.”
    - Ray Lewis

    https://www.baltimoreravens.com/author/cole-jackson

    Twitter: @ColeJacksonFB





  9. #21
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Greensboro, North Carolina
    Posts
    10,031
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravens20002012 View Post
    Both won’t be missed


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I actually will miss Wallace. Say what you want that dude cared. I can't say that about every player on offense.





  10. #22

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    Quote Originally Posted by Corey View Post
    I actually will miss Wallace. Say what you want that dude cared. I can't say that about every player on offense.
    I agree. I also don't get the "soft" label I've seen tossed around. Injuries happen, but when Wallace was healthy he was a damn good #2. Problem is we were using him like a #1.
    "Put your goggles on, 'cause there's gonna be blood and guts everywhere!" - SSSr





  11. #23

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    Quote Originally Posted by moviemaniacx View Post
    I agree. I also don't get the "soft" label I've seen tossed around. Injuries happen, but when Wallace was healthy he was a damn good #2. Problem is we were using him like a #1.
    I've never thought him soft that's really surprising that people say that. I remember him wanting to get back in that game after he got concussed (Vikings?) the dude was easily our best WR and I honestly hoped he'd retire here.





  12. #24

    Re: Maclin and Wallace - clear addition by substraction?

    maclin gonna win comeback player of the year!!!!





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Link To Mobile Site
var infolinks_pid = 3297965; var infolinks_wsid = 0; //—->