Results 37 to 48 of 115
Thread: Seven WRs
-
06-16-2018, 01:06 AM #37Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Towson
- Posts
- 2,040
Re: Seven WRs
I don't see a reason to keep 7 receivers. In the case of the Ravens, it won't be a problem because:
1. Someone will get hurt without having to resort to a phony IR assignment.
2. With no obvious injuries at present, Perriman will be cut before the 3rd day of camp to avoid the roster bonus.
The WR position will be compressed with the large number of special teams contributors from the secondary where much tougher cuts are in the pipe. OL is another area with some tough cuts due to the team's lack of viable swing G/T.
-
-
06-16-2018, 11:28 AM #39Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,670
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: Seven WRs
I agree. Although Moore came on @ WR last year, and developed nicely, I don't see him as a starter. However, as Goode stated, as a #4 WR, along with his Special Teams skills, he has carved out a position on the 53-man roster... also keeping in mind we have him for (at least) two more years at a reasonable $ contract. Teams need players like him and I'm glad he's a Raven... Bc
-
Re: Seven WRs
I disagree. I think Moore has the potential to be Mohammad Sanu. Moore is very physical and can win one on one matchups if his hands improve. Willie Snead is looking to the same thing but more through quickness than strength. Let Moore and Snead battle in camp and start whoever earns the job.
-
06-17-2018, 04:10 PM #41Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 2,074
-
06-17-2018, 04:25 PM #42
Re: Seven WRs
I think two seasons is a little bit early to write off a guy and assume he cannot emerge as more than a role player. The NFL is loaded with guys who took a few years to turn into the player they are today. Chris Moore has only 54 targets in two seasons. That's not a big enough sample size to say he can't become a #2 or #3 WR.
-
06-17-2018, 05:17 PM #43
Re: Seven WRs
"Flacco is driving the ball in that wind....."
(AFCCG, January 2013)
-
06-18-2018, 02:47 AM #44
Re: Seven WRs
No way we keep 7 WRs, rather go with 3 QBs.
-
06-18-2018, 08:23 AM #45Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 4,610
Re: Seven WRs
They should not keep 3 Qbs unless one of the Qbs is banged up. Griffin was out of football all of last year. No need to protect him by keeping him on the roster. They only kept two QBs when Tyrod Taylor was a rookie they should be able to do the same thing this year. Ravens have a ton of guys that could develop as starters and contribute as special teamers right away. Rather keep those guys on the roster rather than a QB that should never see the field. I don't know if that roster spot goes to a WR or a LB or another spot but RGIII would be a waste of a roster spot.
-
Re: Seven WRs
Crab, Smoke, Snead, Moore, Scott, Lasley.
barring injury, those 6 are set in stone. they will not carry 7, even with 2 QBs, because white really is only a RS, and we have other STs players that offer more. Whites biggest contribution, Snead and Moore can handle, while offering much more elsewhere.-JAB
-
Re: Seven WRs
I think White is PS eligible. If so, I think it's unlikely he gets poached to somebody's 53 at the beginning of the season.
-
06-18-2018, 08:20 PM #48Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Location
- Pasadena, MD
- Posts
- 12,236
Bookmarks