ANIMALS: Here’s How Unethical The Mainstream Media Really Are

**ravenmaniac4life** · 07-06-2018, 01:09 PM

Originally Posted by DitkasSausage

The MSM is too ignorant to see that they destroyed their own party by propping up Obama. They have no clue. Think of this: the DNC lost more seats during Obama’s presidency than ANY political party in the history of the United States. The Democrats are completely depleted. Want to know why you keep hearing of Pelosi, Schumer, Waters, and Warren? Who the hell else is left that even speaks? Obama had failed policies, didn’t secure the SCOTUS when he had YEARS of chances with RBG, and sat on his throne of bad ideas while Valerie Jarrett whispered sweet Marxism in his ear. He never questioned his own ignorance until the end. Even then he brushed it off. Trump did 2 things in his first 10 months that did more for the economy than Obama did in 8 years. I don’t think Obama is a “bad man”. He’s probably really nice. I’ve heard he can be arrogant but that’s understandable. His problem is that he bought into the modern liberal professors theory that socialism could work here. It’s total nonsense. Been proven repeatedly.
So now here we sit... the US has resoundingly shot down the “new” DNC (being run by an avid antisemetic socialist btw). They’re losing and the media is trying to sprinkle cinnamon on a turd. They just look dumber every day.

100% truth. Great post, dude.

Regarding the media and their putting cinnamon on a turd (great analogy btw). Here's what's funny. A lot of people think that this media problem in this country is because of Trump.

In another thread, a poster said that the media is "making mis-statements" about Trump because they are trying to play catchup with him. I thought using the word "mis-statements" was hilarious. I've never heard about "playing catchup." It didn't make any sense, but...I guess sometimes you have to do mental gymnastics in order to justify Trump hate. So, I took that as..."because of Trump...the media is telling bold-faced lies" about him on a regular basis (animals, everything going on at the border, Flynn talking to Russia prior to the election, Wikileaks coordinating with DTJr, etc). That argument doesn't hold an ounce of water when you actually look at facts and reality.

BHO was the first indicator that the MSM would simply refuse to cover stories that would show a politician that they liked in a bad light (see the Louis Farrakhan photo). The media covered Clinton's Chinagate and Travelgate...but they refused to cover the Obama IRS scandal with the same tenacity as they would have under Bush. It was really weird to see this happening in real time. Why was Barry getting a free pass? Why was he protected? The press also downplayed BHO’s involvement in the botched "Fast and Furious" gun operation scandal. The MSM openly mocked the Right/Conservative media’s anger over the Obama administration's manipulation of the 2012 Benghazi terror attack ignoring everything the POTUS did to make sure that scandal was covered up.

Obama had to be protected at all costs, including the cost of the media's credibility. All of this happened before Trump even came onto the political scene. We’re in the middle of the 10th consecutive year of the MSM openly showing their true colors as the propaganda arm of the DNC. It has nothing to do with Trump...even though some people like to revise history and believe that. Trump is the first political person to fight back against the bullshit. The media has openly been putting cinnamon on a turd since 2008 and more people see it that way than in years past. Hence...why the MSM's party...the Democratic Party...is in absolute shambles.

**blah3** · 07-06-2018, 01:19 PM

Originally Posted by ravenmaniac4life

Check this out... more bullshit.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/06/polit...ech/index.html

He showed his cards in the first line... “I go through his speeches to find the 20-50 lines that are troubling...”

!

A lot of his points boil down to that the media cannot control the narrative when it comes to Trump. They have always been able to do it in the past with Republicans, but Trump doesn't cower and takes it to them. And they are losing.

**ravenmaniac4life** · 07-06-2018, 01:30 PM

Originally Posted by blah3

A lot of his points boil down to that the media cannot control the narrative when it comes to Trump. They have always been able to do it in the past with Republicans, but Trump doesn't cower and takes it to them. And they are losing.

**NCRAVEN** · 07-06-2018, 02:03 PM

Originally Posted by blah3

A lot of his points boil down to that the media cannot control the narrative when it comes to Trump. They have always been able to do it in the past with Republicans, but Trump doesn't cower and takes it to them. And they are losing.

Just like Reagan. Except Reagan was a bit more tactful.