Results 61 to 72 of 270
-
05-19-2017, 09:23 AM #61Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Feb 2015
- Posts
- 2,077
-
05-19-2017, 09:27 AM #62
Re: The BR.com Explanation for Correa
We seem to fall into this trap a lot with 2nd rounders. "This guy has a 1st round grade and we have a chance to take him half way into the 2nd!!". Then we try to make them into a completely different player than what they were in college, completely nullifying the "value".
Meanwhile our mid round picks and later, even UDFA's, actually fit our system and end up being more productive despite not having the athleticism/pedigree/college production of the 2nd rounders.
-
Re: The BR.com Explanation for Correa
Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but this seems to me like he didn't dedicate himself to learning the playbook. These guys get playbooks within a few weeks of being drafted. Their primary goal should be to understand their playbooks, understand what others are doing, and working out. Period.
Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
Re: The BR.com Explanation for Correa
That's what he said. They even quoted him.
What I don't understand is how that lasts all season. I get it, Correa comes into camp not knowing the playbook like he should. He then has a whole month to learn it. Once the season starts he's on the bench. Wouldn't that be the kick in the ass required to know every punctuation mark in that playbook? I'd be completely distraught and do everything possible to be prepared. Hopefully that's what happened this offseason but it should have also happened during last season
-
-
05-19-2017, 09:50 AM #66
Re: The BR.com Explanation for Correa
I don't ever remember a will backer who started in his first year. It is a position with too much to learn - mentally a firm grasp of the d-line in front of you and the secondary behind you - and physically, gap, rush and coverage skills. It seems to me the only way to get there would be to develop players into the role unless you had a true super talent. As I have been saying all along, this year we will be in a position to know. I think the coaches, player and FO know they need Correa to be who they thought he was.
-
05-19-2017, 10:02 AM #67Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,670
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: The BR.com Explanation for Correa
BB, I really don't know a lot about where exactly Correa played in college and what his on-field responsibilities were. However, if what you posted is true, and WILL is new to him, then why did they draft him in the first place? Wouldn't you want someone with experience at the position? I sure would... Bc
-
05-19-2017, 10:10 AM #68
Re: The BR.com Explanation for Correa
"Cause if you ain’t pissed off for greatness, that just means you’re okay with being mediocre, and ain’t no man in here okay with just basic.”
- Ray Lewis
https://www.baltimoreravens.com/author/cole-jackson
Twitter: @ColeJacksonFB
-
05-19-2017, 10:13 AM #69Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 596
Re: The BR.com Explanation for Correa
Emphasis on "to start the season" - remember, he was getting snaps at ILB in training camp. He was learning that position - and you're looking for your predicted 4th OLB to play some special teams, which he did not.
Dumervil attempted to come back week 3, IIRC, and then reinjured himself week 6 - and it was at that time that they switched Correa back to OLB and had him start learning special teams.
So yes, sure - I guess you could say that he wasn't good enough to unseat McClellan by week 17. In reality, he had to learn two positions, special teams, and adjust to the rigors of the NFL, as opposed to taking a path like Suggs or Spence and focusing on "rushing the passer...."
Writing him off as a bust after all of that is just silly, then again, I remember when Torrey was a bust, Bernard Pierce was the second coming of AP, and Oher was the next Ogden...
-
05-19-2017, 10:32 AM #70Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 9,178
Re: The BR.com Explanation for Correa
This is where I take issue. He had some opportunities to rush the passer, and well, he wasn't very good at it. He got mauled by tackles and couldn't beat TE's. He was 'too light in the ass'.
So, I don't buy the excuse that they confused him with the play book regarding pass rush. You rush, there is nothing really to confuse. I do buy that he couldn't figure out the play book with regards to his other opportunity to play elsewhere. But I can't really fault the Ravens for giving him the opportunity to do something else, when the one he was supposed to be good at, he wasn't at the NFL level.
Now maybe he gets some play strength and can rush better. Maybe he picks up the scheme and plays better inside contributing there. But I'm going to put the primary fault of him not being able to contribute year 1 on him.
-
05-19-2017, 10:38 AM #71
Re: The BR.com Explanation for Correa
Good points Blah. I think that's a pretty good summary.
- Can't rush the passer because he's getting stonewalled.
- Move to ILB to give him a chance to contribute somewhere
- Can't learn the playbook becuase of his laziness
- Sit on the bench behind Orr AND McClellan due to the bullets 1 and 3
One thing I will add is that if he has improved his play strength and focused on the playbook we could reaonsably expect more from him. I mean both of those things are in his control."Cause if you ain’t pissed off for greatness, that just means you’re okay with being mediocre, and ain’t no man in here okay with just basic.”
- Ray Lewis
https://www.baltimoreravens.com/author/cole-jackson
Twitter: @ColeJacksonFB
-
05-19-2017, 10:38 AM #72Four-eyed Raven
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Balt-Wash corridor
- Posts
- 24,676
Bookmarks