Quote Originally Posted by NCRAVEN View Post
To prove a point. And a secondary point, that I knew you wouldn't answer the question.

Because answering that question you would have said that you would have done the exact same thing he did. And by your response as to not knowing whose voice it was or who was on top, it's clear you didn't watch the trial.
Your point is that I wouldn't answer the question? That's a personal point about me that has nothing to do with GZ or the case. So ... bravo?

I am well aware of the tension that surrounded whose voice it was. That TM's father said it wasn't TM at first then changed his mind. Different experts said who it was or wasn't.

I didn't answer your question not because of what my answer may have been. I didn't answer it because it is petty. You are bursting for the chance to point and dance if I say, "I would have done x if y happened," when there is no proof that y happened.